Abstract
Endometriosis is the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue outside the uterus and cutaneous endometriosis is a rare manifestation
of this disease that may be found at the sites of surgical scars as a result of iatrogenic implantation. Herein we present a case of
scar endometriosis in a 35-year-old woman. The scar was sustained following a remote caesarean section.
Keywords
cutaneous endometriosis
Case synopsis
An otherwise healthy 35-year-old woman presented to our dermatology clinic with a 3.5 year history of an enlarging and
intermittently tender nodule in her cesarean scar. This growth developed as a small nodule on the leftward aspect of her
Pfannenstiel incision approximately 6 months following
caesarean section 4 years prior. The nodule had waxed and
waned in size over two years and had been rapidly enlarging
over six to eight months. She had not experienced any cyclic
symptoms such as increased pain, swelling, or bleeding from
the nodule associated with her menses. She had an obstetric
history significant for three vaginal deliveries and one
cesarean section via a standard Pfannenstiel incision for pre-
eclampsia at 29 weeks gestation. No treatments had been
undertaken prior to initial presentation. Examination of the
left suprapubic skin revealed a 5 x7 cm, dark brown, firm,
smooth, mobile tender nodule with a 0.5 cm, light blue,
translucent papule located in the superomedial portion of the
nodule (Figure 1). An 8 mm punch biopsy of the lesion was
obtained and sent for histopathological evaluation. No
regional adenopathy was appreciated.
Histopathological examination revealed scattered and
grouped, variably sized glands in the mid and deep reticular
dermis lined by cuboidal and focally columnar epithelium
surrounded by a mucinous and edematous stroma with an
admixed focally dense lymphocytic infiltrate and fibrosis (Figures 2, 3). These findings were diagnostic for cutaneous
endometriosis in this clinical setting.
Figure 2. Variably sized glands in the mid and deep reticular dermis. Figure 3. Glands lined by cuboidal and focally columnar epithelium
surrounded by a mucinous and edematous stroma.
The patient was referred to the gynecological surgery department for further management and definitive treatment. She underwent
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pre-surgical evaluation for abdominal wall and deep pelvic endometriosis, which revealed
a multilobulated 4.5 x 4.4 cm mass located within the soft tissues of the left lower quadrant just anterior to the rectus abdominis
muscle. Additional smaller endometriomas within the medial aspect of the rectus abdominis muscles and infiltrating the
underlying fat were appreciated. The patient subsequently underwent an exploratory laparotomy with resection of three
endometriomas from the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the left lower abdominal wall and the right and left rectus sheath. Her
post-operative course was unremarkable and she remains pain-free to date.
Discussion
Endometriosis is a common gynecological disorder and is defined by the presence of functional ectopic glandular and stromal
endometrial tissue in both pelvic and extra-pelvic locations, including the pelvic peritoneum, ovaries, and rectovaginal septum,
and, in rare cases, on the diaphragm, pleura, and pericardium. Endometriosis affects 6 to 10% of women of reproductive age [1].
Cutaneous endometriosis is a rare form of this disease, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 1% in all patients with
extrapelvic disease [2]. It is characterized by implants of endometrial tissue in the dermis, subcutis, or even skeletal muscle [2].
This presents as often painful and even intermittently bleeding firm red to bluish papules and nodules that may flare during
menses. These symptoms may be associated with menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, abdominal pain, infertility, dyspareunia, and
painful defecation, all of which are common signs of pelvic endometriosis. There are two theories proposed for the etiology of
cutaneous endometriosis: primary (spontaneous) endometriosis, which frequently affects the umbilicus and arises owing to
cellular metaplasia, and secondary endometriosis, which is theorized to develop as a consequence of tubal regurgitation, lymphatic
or hematogenous spread, or iatrogenic mechanical uterine tissue implantation sustained during surgical interventions (e.g.,
caesarean sections, myomectomies, abdominopelvic laparotomies, or episiotomies) [3,4]. The latter entity typically presents as a
nodule within the scar of a previous surgical site [3].
Clinical diagnosis is made by careful history and physical exam. Often suspicion is not raised owing to the rarity of this entity and
biopsy is necessary. Histopathological exam is essential for diagnosis and consists of an admixture of variably sized glandular
structures, which are capable of cyclical variation, comprised of cuboidal to columnar cells with largely banal cytomorphology
[2]. The stroma is described as having a spindled cell appearance with an associated vascular network. Rarely, malignant
transformation can occur [2]. Immunohistochemistry may have utility in aiding in the diagnosis of cutaneous endometriosis. CD10
is expressed in a wide range of cell types, including strong expressivity in the cytoplasm of endometrial stroma; this latter
characteristic has particular applicability if the lesion has limited glandular structures relative to stroma in the biopsy specimen
[2]. Estrogen and progesterone receptor immunostains reveal strong nuclear positivity in both glands and stroma as well and are
useful for diagnostic support.
Subsequent imaging procedures can support the diagnosis, and MRI is particularly useful for pre-surgical mapping and
observation of infiltrative disease in the abdominal wall and subcutaneous tissues [5]. The clinical differential diagnosis includes
keloid scar, hernia, abscess, granulomatous inflammation, hemangioma, cyst, malignancy, desmoid tumor, melanocytic nevus,
melanoma [4, 5, 6].
Wide local surgical excision is the accepted treatment of choice in most cases of cutaneous endometriosis with relatively minimal
risk for recurrence [4, 7]. Additionally, there are variably successful reports of use of hormonal-based therapies such as androgen
and estrogen analogues and GnRH agonists. These may have particular advantages when used in cases with coexistent pelvic
endometriosis [4]. Moreover, hormonal therapies may be employed preoperatively to reduce the total burden of disease, thereby
decreasing the ultimate surgical defect.
In summary, cutaneous endometriosis is an infrequent type of extrapelvic endometriosis and should be considered in the
differential diagnosis in women presenting with papular or nodular lesions of the umbilical skin or embedded within or near pelvic
surgical scars sustained following gynecological or obstetrical prodecures. The diagnosis is made after a thorough history and
physical exam in conjunction with histopathological review of lesional skin. The treatment of choice is surgical excision.
References
1. Giudice L. Clinical Practice: Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2010 June 24; 362(25): 2389–2398. [PMID: 20573927]
2. Farooq U, Laureano A, Miteva M, et al. Cutaneous endometriosis: Diagnostic immunohistochemistry and clinicopathologic
correlation. J Cutan Pathol. 2011; 38: 525-528. [PMID:21352260]
3. Vozmediano J, Hita J, and Santos J. Cutaneous endometriosis. Int J Dermatol. 2010; 49(12):1410-1412. [PMID:21091675]
4. Purvis R and Tyring S. Cutaneous and subcutaneous endometriosis. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994; 20:693-695.
[PMID:7930017]
5. Uzunçakmak C, Güldaş A, Ozçam H, et al. Scar endometriosis: A case report of this uncommon entity and review of the
literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2013:386783. [PMID:23762683]
6. Stojanovic M, Brasanac D, and Stojicic M. Cutaneous inguinal scar endosalpingiosis and endometriosis: Case report with
review of literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2013; 35(2): 254-260. [PMID:23249836]
7. Din A, Verjee L, and Griffiths M. Cutaneous endometriosis: A plastic surgery perspective. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
2013; 66(1):129-130. [PMID:22784788]