Mifepristone Is an Effective Oral Alternative for the Prevention of Premature Luteinizing Hormone Surges and/or Premature Luteinization in Women Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation forin VitroFertilization
article
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
Mifepristone effectively prevented premature LH surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF, but negatively impacted endometrial receptivity and gene expression.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The present clinical study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a daily dose of 40 mg mifepristone in preventing premature LH surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization and to study the effect of this antiprogestin cotreatment on endometrial receptivity. This was a prospective, open-label, randomized, exploratory study in 15 healthy volunteer oocyte donors who were randomly allocated to the experimental COH group, including mifepristone (group 1), or the control group, using a long protocol with GnRH agonists (group 2), in a ratio of 2:1, i.e. 10 and five subjects, respectively. In group 1, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was randomly administered (group 1A) or was withheld (group 1B) at the end of stimulation, so that two subgroups of five subjects each were formed, differing in the final oocyte maturation trigger. In all patients receiving mifepristone, 50 mg progesterone were administered im at the time of hCG administration to counteract residual antiprogestogenic activity of mifepristone. Serum estradiol, progesterone (P), LH, and FSH levels were monitored in each patient on d 3 and 6 and every 48 h thereafter. Endometrial biopsies were taken 2 and 7 d after hCG or P administration. Endometrial tissue was processed and evaluated in a blinded fashion for endometrial dating and quantitative PCR of at least four genes known to be up-regulated in receptive endometrium. The total FSH dose and duration of treatment in the two arms of the study were similar. The mean LH levels on d 6 of stimulation and the day of hCG/P treatment in the mifepristone group were 0.8 +/- 0.7 and 0.5 +/- 0.6 mIU/ml, and those in control subjects were 2.4 +/- 3.8 and 2.0 +/- 1.7 mIU/ml, respectively. No LH surges were observed in any subject treated with mifepristone. Serum P levels on the day of hCG/P were below the cut-off level (1.2 ng/ml) in all subjects of the mifepristone group (range, <0.5 to 1.05 ng/ml). The mean numbers of cumulus-oocyte complexes retrieved were 11.6 +/- 6.6 and 19.6 +/- 11.8 in the subgroup treated with mifepristone and hCG and in the control group, respectively. The mean percentages of metaphase II, metaphase I, and germinal vesicle stage oocytes were 86.2, 6.9, and 3.4% in the mifepristone group and 68.4, 6.1, and 11.2% in the control group. In the mifepristone group that did not receive hCG and received P only at the end of stimulation, an endogenous LH surge was not observed nor were oocytes obtained. Histological evaluation of endometrial samples in patients treated with mifepristone and hCG (group 1A) confirmed normal development, whereas in patients treated with mifepristone only (group 1B), there was a complete arrest of the endometrial maturation. The expression patterns of glycodelin, IGF-binding protein-7, glutathione peroxidase-3, and solute carrier family 1 member 1 show a striking absence of up-regulation in patients treated with mifepristone (groups 1A and 1B) compared with controls (group 2). The results of this exploratory study provide evidence that mifepristone is effective for the prevention of premature LH surges and/or premature luteinization in women undergoing COH for in vitro fertilization. However, endometrial receptivity status requires additional evaluation after decreasing RU-486 doses before this strategy can be considered as a new alternative to GnRH agonist/antagonist treatment.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (35)
- Dating the Endometrial Biopsy via openalex
- Secretory changes in preovulatory endometrium during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with buserelin acetate and human gonadotropins via openalex
- W1922735013 via openalex
- W1975833969 via openalex
- W1981384075 via openalex
- W1987937301 via openalex
- W1995145782 via openalex
- W2003778314 via openalex
- W2013000621 via openalex
- W2026040466 via openalex
- W2027163344 via openalex
- W2041145382 via openalex
- W2057941571 via openalex
- W2061340478 via openalex
- W2062684697 via openalex
- W2069362033 via openalex
- W104737984 via openalex
- W2085122456 via openalex
- W2097297708 via openalex
- W2123080882 via openalex
- W2127368795 via openalex
- W2131053749 via openalex
- W2131993172 via openalex
- W2134980171 via openalex
- W2150932913 via openalex
- W2157598013 via openalex
- W2163492007 via openalex
- W2171301406 via openalex
- W2259750020 via openalex
- W2272860517 via openalex
- W2333135605 via openalex
- W2397344358 via openalex
- W2401655965 via openalex
- W2075370894 via openalex
- W1911757646 via openalex
Cited by (5)
- Clinical Utility of Mifepristone: Apprising the Expanding Horizons 2022
- Effects of Antiprogestins on the Uterus 2008
- Selective progesterone receptor modulators 2: use in reproductive medicine 2008
- Progesterone receptor antagonists and selective progesterone receptor modulators: proven and potential clinical applications 2007
- Progesterone receptor modulators and the endometrium: changes and consequences† 2007
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK