ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Postmenopausal Subacute or Chronic Pelvic Pain: Update 2025

Kimberly L. Shampain, Myra Feldman, Adrian Dawkins, Lee A. Learman, Ekta Maheshwari, Kira Melamud, Krupa K Patel-Lippmann, Loretta M. Strachowski, Angela Tong, Wendaline VanBuren, Ashish P. Wasnik
In: Journal of the American College of Radiology · 2026 · vol. 23(6) , pp. 1137–1144 · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2026.01.033 · PMID:41784596 · W7134002698
article OA: bronze CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

The ACR Appropriateness Criteria® provide updated guidelines for the appropriate imaging workup of postmenopausal women experiencing subacute or chronic pelvic pain.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain, which persists longer than 6 months by definition, is a common condition which affects women of all ages with causes differing by age group. This document will focus on gynecologic origins of chronic pelvic pain, etiologies including chronic pelvic inflammatory disease, postsurgical changes, vaginal or vulvar cysts, and pelvic venous congestion disorder. Ultrasound is the initial imaging modality of choice with MRI or CT of the pelvis may be used in select cases when initial ultrasound is inconclusive. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (29)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK