Complications of laparoscopy--operative and diagnostic

Observational OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 9 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-03 ⓘ

A retrospective review of 2,324 laparoscopies found an overall major complication rate of 0.22%, with operative laparoscopies having more complications than diagnostic ones.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the characteristics and rates of complications for operative laparoscopy and diagnostic laparoscopy. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary-care university hospital. PATIENTS: Two thousand three hundred twenty-four patients undergoing operative laparoscopy or diagnostic laparoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: Operative laparoscopy including lysis of adhesions, tubal surgery, ovarian surgery, uterine surgery, or destruction of endometriosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complication rates for operative and diagnostic laparoscopies were tabulated and compared. RESULTS: The overall major complication rate for this series of 2,324 laparoscopies was 0.22%. There were five major and 15 minor complications. In the operative laparoscopy group, there were more complications from Veress needle and trocar insertion (n = 15) than from the actual operative procedures (n = 3). There were more total complications in the operative laparoscopy group (n = 18) than in the diagnostic laparoscopy group (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Operative laparoscopy is efficacious for a variety of gynecologic surgical procedures.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Genital Diseases, Female Genital Diseases, Female Laparoscopy Abdominal Muscles Abdominal Muscles Abdominal Muscles Adult Adult Blood Vessels Blood Vessels Blood Vessels Female Female Genital Diseases, Female Genital Diseases, Female Humans Humans Intestines Intestines Intestines

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (9)

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-16T06:09:50.462052+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:59:49.088203+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK