The experience we gained enabled us to establish the requirements for performing endometrioma sclerotherapy through a transvaginal approach. These include the following:
- Absence of elevated levels of blood tumor markers (CA125, HE4, and ROMA index) and sonographic signs, considering that about 0.8% of all endometrioid ovarian cysts subsequently become malignant [25]. For endometriosis that exhibits a dynamic increase, a moderate increase in CA125 is considered acceptable [26, 27]. The sensitivity and specificity of transvaginal ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of endometriomas and other ovarian masses are 75–84% and 88–91%, respectively [28].
- Endometriomas that range from 20 to 65 mm in diameter. To optimize the exposure of ethanol and the endometrial capsule lining and mitigate the risk of recurrence, larger diameter masses should preferably be sclerosed laparoscopically.
- Absence of small (up to 20 mm) cysts surrounding the main endometrioma. Their minimal volume prevents puncture and further sclerosing. Endometriomas of this size should either be excised or coagulated during laparoscopy, as they have the potential to cause rapid recurrence and reduce the success of the surgery.
- Sclerotherapy under anesthesia is the preferred treatment when there is evidence of multiple endometriomas (not more than 3) and single endometriomas of small size (less than 3 cm) combined with evidence of adhesions in retrocervical endometriosis, which makes transvaginal access difficult.
- Informed, voluntary consent to undergo the procedure. It is imperative to provide the patient with a coherent explanation of the nuances of aspiration puncture sclerotherapy (for e.g., the lack of a stage involving the excision of endometrioma pseudocapsule and the possibility of endometrioma recurrence). It was advised to conduct a control ultrasound examination on the first day following the operation to ascertain the diameter of the sclerosed ovarian endometrioma capsule and subsequently to monitor its size alterations.
- Sufficient training of the sonographer to evaluate the potential of accessing the puncture needle through the posterior vaginal arch to avoid injury to adjacent organs (colon, bladder, and major vessels) and the development of infectious disease complications.
- Equipment: Transvaginal probe guide, fine needle aspiration needle (17G), 20/50 ml syringe or aspiration system, 0.9% saline to liquefy endometrioid debris, and 95% ethyl alcohol. Occasionally, it is difficult to aspirate dense endometrioid debris during transvaginal puncture. We have discovered that forced injection of 0.9% saline into the cyst cavity can effectively dilute its contents, i.e., reduce the density of endometrioid debris and aid the aspiration process.
- The endometrioma capsule should be exposed to ethanol for at least 10 minutes to reduce the recurrence rate. It is permissible to retain a small quantity of sclerosant in the endometrioma cavity.
- Aspirated endometrioid debris should be submitted for cytologic examination considering the prevalent cancer protocols for any ovarian mass.
ADDITIONAL INFO
Authors’ contribution. A.A. Popov — surgical treatment of the patient, literature review, writing the text and editing the article; M.R. Ovsiannikova — curation of patient, collection and analysis of literary sources, writing the text and editing the article; J.I. Sopova — surgical treatment of the patient, editing the article; A.A. Fedorov — surgical treatment of the patient, editing the article; V.V. Troshina — editing the article; E.V. Pelshe — laboratory diagnostics, editing the article; I.Yu. Ershova — editing the article. All authors confirm that their authorship meets the international ICMJE criteria (all authors made a substantial contribution to the conception of the work, acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data for the work, drafting and revising the work, final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work).
Funding source. This study was not supported by any external sources of funding.
Competing interests. The authors declares that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.
Consent for publication. Written consent was obtained from all the study participants before the study screening in according to the study protocol approved by the local ethic committee Department of Operative Gynecology with Oncogynecology and Day Hospital, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of the Moscow Region “Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology” N 9 19.10.2021.
About the authors
Alexander A. Popov
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky
Email:
[email protected]
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8734-1673
SPIN-code: 5452-6728
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowMaiia R. Ovsiannikova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky
Author for correspondence.
Email:
[email protected]
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0919-6567
SPIN-code: 8635-3094
Postgraduate Student
Russian Federation, MoscowJulia I. Sopova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky
Email:
[email protected]
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6935-6086
SPIN-code: 6641-6742
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowAnton A. Fedorov
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky; Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirsky
Email:
[email protected]
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2590-5087
SPIN-code: 2598-7181
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowVlada V. Troshina
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky
Email:
[email protected]
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1873-5676
Postgraduate Student
Russian Federation, MoscowEyzhena V. Pelshe
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky
Email:
[email protected]
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5674-1284
SPIN-code: 8964-2126
Research Associate
Russian Federation, MoscowIrina Y. Ershova
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky
Email:
[email protected]
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9327-0656
SPIN-code: 5098-6945
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Chen Y, Pei H, Chang Y, et al. The impact of endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve and the exploration of related factors assessed by serum anti-Mullerian hormone: a prospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res. 2014;7:108. doi: 10.1186/s13048-014-0108-0
- Hughesdon PE. The structure of endometrial cysts of the ovary. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64(4):481–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1957.tb06276.x
- Hachisuga T, Kawarabayashi T. Histopathological analysis of laparoscopically treated ovarian endometriotic cysts with special reference to loss of follicles. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(2):432–435. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.2.432
- Somigliana E, Berlanda N, Benaglia L, et al. Surgical excision of endometriomas and ovarian reserve: a systematic review on serum antimüllerian hormone level modifications. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1531–1538. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.009
- Alborzi S, Keramati P, Younesi M, et al. The impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve in patients with unilateral and bilateral endometriomas. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):427–434. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.019
- Raffi F, Metwally M, Amer S. The impact of excision of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(9):3146–3154. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1558
- Muzii L, Achilli C, Lecce F, et al. Second surgery for recurrent endometriomas is more harmful to healthy ovarian tissue and ovarian reserve than first surgery. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(3):738–743. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.101
- Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(3):400–412. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det457
- Alshehre SM, Narice BF, Fenwick MA, Metwally M. The impact of endometrioma on in vitro fertilisation/intra-cytoplasmic injection IVF/ICSI reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303(1):3–16. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05796-9
- Coccia ME, Rizzello F, Barone S, et al. Is there a critical endometrioma size associated with reduced ovarian responsiveness in assisted reproduction techniques? Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(2):259–266. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.04.019
- Benaglia L, Busnelli A, Biancardi R, et al. Oocyte retrieval difficulties in women with ovarian endometriomas. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(1):77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.020
- Akamatsu N, Hirai T, Masaoka H, et al. Ultrasonically guided puncture of endometrial cysts-aspiration of contents and infusion of ethanol. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1988;40(2):187–191.
- Albanese G, Kondo KL. Pharmacology of sclerotherapy. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2010;27(4):391–399. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267848
- Hsieh CL, Shiau CS, Lo LM, et al. Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided aspiration and sclerotherapy with 95% ethanol for treatment of recurrent ovarian endometriomas. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2709–2713. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.056
- Vaduva CC, Dira L, Carp-Veliscu A, et al. Ovarian reserve after treatment of ovarian endometriomas by ethanolic sclerotherapy compared to surgical treatment. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(12):5575–5582. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202306_32795
- Martinez-Garcia JM, Candas B, Suarez-Salvador E, et al. Comparing the effects of alcohol sclerotherapy with those of surgery on anti-Müllerian hormone and ovarian reserve after endometrioma treatment. A prospective multicenter pilot cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;259:60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.027
- Yazbeck C, Koskas M, Cohen Scali S, et al. Comment je fais… la sclérothérapie à l'éthanol d'un endométriome [How I do... ethanol sclerotherapy for ovarian endometriomas]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012;40(10):620–622. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.07.029
- Miquel L, Preaubert L, Gnisci A, et al. Transvaginal ethanol sclerotherapy for an endometrioma in 10 steps. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(1):259–260. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1422
- Miquel L, Preaubert L, Gnisci A, et al. Endometrioma ethanol sclerotherapy could increase IVF live birth rate in women with moderate-severe endometriosis. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0239846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239846
- Alborzi S, Zahiri Sorouri Z, Askari E, et al. The success of various endometrioma treatments in infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Reprod Med Biol. 2019;18(4):312–322. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12286
- Cohen A, Almog B, Tulandi T. Sclerotherapy in the management of ovarian endometrioma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(1):117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.015
- Yazbeck C, Madelenat P, Ayel JP, et al. Ethanol sclerotherapy: a treatment option for ovarian endometriomas before ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(1):121–125. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60055-7
- Garcia-Tejedor A, Martinez-Garcia JM, Candas B, et al. Ethanol sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic surgery for endometrioma treatment: a prospective, multicenter, cohort pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(5):1133–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.036
- Noma J, Yoshida N. Efficacy of ethanol sclerotherapy for ovarian endometriomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;72(1):35–39. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00307-6
- Haraguchi H, Koga K, Takamura M, et al. Development of ovarian cancer after excision of endometrioma. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1432–1437. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1077
- Sasamoto N, DePari M, Vitonis AF, et al. Evaluation of CA125 in relation to pain symptoms among adolescents and young adult women with and without surgically-confirmed endometriosis. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0238043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238043
- Kvaskoff M, Mahamat-Saleh Y, Farland LV, et al. Endometriosis and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(2):393–420. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa045
- Mais V, Guerriero S, Ajossa S, et al. The efficiency of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometrioma. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(5):776–780. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56275-x