Minilaparoscopy in gynecology: applications, benefits and limitations

Jvan Casarin, Chiara Cimmino, Valeria Artuso, Antonella Cromi, Fabio Ghezzi
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology · 2021 · vol. 73(2) , pp. 179–184 · doi:10.23736/s2724-606x.20.04753-x · PMID:33435662 · W3120611292
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This review examines the feasibility, benefits including improved cosmesis and reduced pain, and limitations of minilaparoscopy in gynecologic surgery for selected patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The word "minilaparoscopy" refers to laparoscopic surgical procedures performed using <5-mm trocars, with the exception of the umbilical access. The aim of this review is to explore the feasibility of minilaparoscopy in gynecologic surgery, focusing on instruments, surgical techniques, application and limits of this approach. In this review the authors discussed the positive features and limitation of 3-mm laparoscopy for gynecologic surgery. Using smaller trocars decreases incisional and postoperative pain, and shortens hospitalization, and provides a better cosmetic outcome. Transvaginal specimen extraction can be used to maximize the aesthetic outcomes. A minilaparoscopic surgical procedure is accomplished with lower carbon dioxide pressures, reducing pneumoperitoneum related complications. Accurate patient selection is critical in order to offer the best laparoscopic approach, considering that obesity and endometriosis may represent a challenge for 3-mm surgical tools, which are more flexible and have lower grasping ability. Minilaparoscopy has been shown as a valid alternative to conventional laparoscopy both for diagnostic purpose, major surgical procedures and oncological surgery. Minilaparoscopy in gynecologic surgery represents an option for selected patients, for both benign and malignant indications. The aesthetic outcome represents the main benefit of this approach. Surgeons must be aware of few limitations of this technique such as severe obesity and endometriosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Gynecology Laparoscopy Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Postoperative Pain Surgical Instruments

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (3)

References (43)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-14T06:08:20.186862+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:25:00.839251+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK