Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: A randomized trial

Fabio Ghezzi, Antonella Cromi, Cromi A, Giacomo Colombo, Colombo G, Stefano Uccella, Valentino Bergamini, Bergamini V, Maurizio Serati, Pierfrancesco Bolis, Bolis P
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2005 · vol. 12(6) , pp. 480–485 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2005.09.002 · PMID:16337574 · W2029104609
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This randomized trial investigated the impact of minimizing ancillary port size in gynecologic laparoscopy on patient outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Study objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effect on postoperative pain of laparoscopy for the management of adnexal masses by downsizing ancillary trocars from 5- to 3-mm.DesignRandomized, controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).SettingGynecologic department of a university hospitalPatientsA total of 102 women with an adnexal mass scheduled for gynecologic laparoscopic procedures were randomized to undergo laparoscopy using either conventional 5-mm ancillary trocars (n=52) or 3-mm instruments (n=50). Preoperative suspicion of malignancy, deep infiltrating endometriosis, and indications for hysterectomy or myomectomy were considered as exclusion criteria.InterventionsLaparoscopic procedures for the treatment of benign adnexal masses.Measurements and main resultsBoth groups were similar in patient age, body mass index, history of abdominal surgery, and type of procedures. Intraoperative complications occurred in no patient (0%) in the 3-mm group and in two patients (3.8%) in the 5-mm group (p=.49). Conversion from 3- to 5-mm instrumentation was necessary in one procedure. No difference was found in the operative time between the 3-mm and the 5-mm groups (54 min [range 15-175 min] vs 50 min [range 20-150 min], p=.89). The severity of incisional pain was evaluated with a 100-mm visual analog scale at 1, 3, and 24 hours after surgery. Postoperative pain was significantly lower in the 3-mm than in the 5-mm group 1 hour after laparoscopy (20 [range 0-60] vs 32.5 [range 0-80], p=.04). The proportion of women requiring analgesia before discharge, the timing of analgesic requirement, and the total amount of medication in the first 24 hours after surgery were similar in the two groups.ConclusionThree-millimeter ancillary trocars can safely replace traditional-size equipment for the management of adnexal masses without a negative impact on the surgeon's ability to perform gynecologic laparoscopy and are associated with less immediate postoperative pain.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Adnexal Diseases Laparoscopes Laparoscopy Postoperative Pain Adnexal Diseases Adult Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Middle Aged Postoperative Pain Prospective Studies Treatment Outcome

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

Cited by (4)

References (26)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-04T06:16:37.499272+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:29.922408+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK