Parental consanguinity and ovarian reserve: A retrospective cohort study.

OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-24 ⓘ

This retrospective cohort study of 414 women in Oman found no statistically significant difference in ovarian reserve markers, including AMH and AFC, between those born to consanguineous parents and those born to non-consanguineous parents.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-24 · read from full text ⓘ

This retrospective cohort study investigated the association between parental consanguinity and ovarian reserve markers in 414 infertile women aged 39 or younger undergoing treatment in Oman. The researchers measured anti-Müllerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and antral follicle count to determine if offspring of related parents exhibited reduced fertility potential compared to those with unrelated parents. The analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in any ovarian reserve parameters between the consanguineous and non-consanguineous groups, contradicting previous findings from other regions. Relevance to endometriosis: The paper explicitly excluded patients diagnosed with endometriosis from its study population to isolate the effects of consanguinity on ovarian reserve.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BackgroundInfertility affects around 10-15% of couples worldwide and is both a social and medical problem. Parental consanguinity is considered to reduce fertility reserve. Consanguineous marriages, especially first cousin marriages, are very common in Oman according to the Oman National Health Survey data.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine whether women born to consanguineous parents have reduced ovarian reserve.Materials and methodsThis cohort study was conducted on 414 women aged ≤ 39, treated for infertility at Sultan Qaboos University hospital and Royal hospital, Muscat, Oman from January 2019-December 2020. Each participant was interviewed and a complete history, including parental consanguinity and physical examination, were recorded. On day 2 of the menstrual cycle, serum concentration of the following was performed: follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone, estradiol, prolactin, thyroid stimulating hormone, and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). AMH was done, if necessary, on other days of the cycle. Antral follicle count (AFC) was done on day 2 and 3 of the menstrual cycle.ResultsOf the 414 women, parental consanguinity was present in 40.2% of couples. In women with low AFC, parental consanguinity was present in 15.3% compared to 13.0% in the non-consanguineous group. About 15% of women with low AMH had consanguineous parents, compared to 20.2% from the non-consanguineous group. High levels of FSH were present in 6.5% and 4.2% of the consanguineous and non-consanguineous groups, respectively. No significant difference was observed in AFC with reference to body mass index.ConclusionThe results from this study showed no statistically significant difference in low ovarian reserves (AFC, AMH, and FSH) in women whose parents had a consanguineous marriage.
Full text 12,070 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 2 sections · click to expand

Section

In conclusion, our study indicated that parental consanguinity does not affect their female offspring's ovarian reserve.

Coi Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-27T09:11:36.575535+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0