Ovarian endometriosis is a particular form of endometriosis,
which is characterized by specific clinical, pathophysiological and
histological characteristics:
i. Ovarian endometriosis is the most frequent localization of
endometriosis lesions;
ii. Ovarian endometriosis adversely affects the folliculogenesis in
general and the function of yellow body in particular;
iii. Ovarian endometriosis inhibits ovarian reserve, destroying the
functional tissue of the ovaries;
iv. it is believed that originally it is ovarian endometriosis, which
causes the development of severe complication - deep infiltrative
endometriosis;
v. Finally, ovarian endometriosis, in contrast to other localizations,
presents the greatest potential threat of malignization.
Features of the histogenesis of the ovarian endometriomas
(capacity of infiltration into surrounding tissues) lead to the decrease
of the amount of functioning ovarian tissue, regardless of the size
of the formation. Another concept of ovarian dysfunction in cases
of endometriosis is that endometriomas contain a huge amount of
free iron, which forms toxic superoxide by reaction with hydrogen
peroxide, leading to oxidative stress and thus to disruption in the
functioning of the cell. The impact of reactive oxygen species on the
activity of anti-inflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, growth
factors and angiogenic factors leads to inhibition of cell growth in
the ovary.1 Therefore the presence of endometrioma can already be
considered as a damage factor of ovarian reserve.
One more important problem of endometriomas is oncological
alertness. Today the risk of malignization of endometriosis is not the
reason for the debate. However, in the discussion of this problem is
a “slipping away” important clarification: the ability to malignization
usually has ovarian endometriosis. For ovarian endometriosis is
typical cellular irregularities, which are usually regarded as the phase
transition of benign to malignant process.2
It seems that the presence of such features has to establish
absolute indications for surgical treatment of patients with ovarian
endometriosis. However, the question of tactics of treatment is
discussed up to the present time. There is a point of view, according
to which ovarian endometriomas with a diameter up to 3 cm may
conduct drug therapy. The main argument of this position is the
sharply negative impact of surgery on ovarian reserve and ovaries. It
is impossible not to admit that this fact has a high level of confidence.
Mechanisms of loss of follicular reserve after surgical treatment of
patients with ovarian endometriomas are different. However, the main
reason is closely associated with morphogenesis of endometriomas.
Endometrioma, in contrast to other tumors, is characterized by the
presence of subepithelial dense adhesions between the cyst capsule
and the hilus – the place of passage of major blood and lymphatic
vessels, supplying the ovary. Therefore, cystectomy in cases of
endometriotic cysts is a big trauma to the ovary, and the need for
ligation (coagulation) of the ovary in the area of its portal causes
additional disturbances in the ovarian blood supply.
So, on the one hand, passive observation or medical therapy
of endometriomas is associated with the high risk of various
complications (the decrease of ovarian function, an expanisve growth,
the threat of malignization); on the other hand, classic cystectomy is
fraught with potential loss of ovarian reserve. Therefore, to solve this
problem a compromise is required. Today, the role of the “Golden
mean” of the treatment of patients with ovarian endometriomas
performs aspiration (sclerosing) therapy.
In the literature of recent years, there are a relatively large number
of publications on this subject. The authors of the present work carried
out the first such intervention in 1999 in a female patient, 32 years
old, with single ovary, which was diagnosed with a recurrence of
endometriotic cysts after previous cystectomy. 3 The first experiment
was successful: after 2 years of infertility, pregnancy came and ended
with a normal delivery.
From that period there were 118 such interventions, a retrospective
analysis of which helped to justify clear indications for sclerosing
therapy of ovarian endometriomas:
MOJ Gerontol Ger. 2018;3(3):238‒239. 238
© 2018 Davydov et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.
Ovarian endometriomas: the role of aspiration
(sclerosing) therapy
Volume 3 Issue 3 - 2018
Davydov AI, Shahlamova MN
Professor of Medicine at the Chair of Obstetrics, Gynaecology
and Perinatology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical
University, Russia
Correspondence: Davydov Aleksandr Il’gizirovich, Professor
of Medicine at the Chair of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and
Perinatology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical
University, Russia, Email
[email protected]
Received: February 16, 2018 | Published: June 06, 2018