Anterior Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: A Series of Case Reports

INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis is a chronic, hormone-dependent, progressive and recurrent disease characterized by the existence of tissue outside the uterine cavity, similar to endometrium in the morphological and functional properties. This disease is gaining increasing medical and social significance due to its severe clinical manifestations and recurrent course, as well as a negative impact on the quality of life and working capacity of women. The incidence of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) that is referred to extragenital localization, is 0.3% to 3.5%. In most cases, it develops after cesarean section, less often after other gynecological operations (hysterectomy, removal of endometrioid ovarian cysts). Its recognition presents certain difficulties due to the necessity of differential diagnosis with postoperative hernias, ligature abscesses, hematomas and use of additional imaging methods. In this context, of interest is to study the clinical and history data, localization and management tactics for female patients with the anterior abdominal wall endometriosis. AIM: Investigation of clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment of one of the rarest and least studied forms of extragenital localization of endometriosis — AWE — and improvement of management tactics for patients with this pathology.

A clinical analysis of AWE cases with several variants of its invasion was carried out in 7 female patients.

The age of the patients ranged from 27 to 39 years (median — 33 years). All the seven patients had a past cesarean section; the period after surgical delivery ranged from 3 to 7 years. Six patients reported pain in the area of the postoperative scar associated with the menstrual cycle, 1 noted the presence of a palpable formation of the anterior abdominal wall. During surgical treatment, excision of endometrioid infiltrates located in the area of the postoperative scar was performed, followed by histological verification.

Taking into account the relative rarity of AWE, the difficulty of its early identification, the need for differential diagnosis using additional examination methods, greater awareness of this disease is required among doctors of related specialties. Diagnostic alertness is especially relevant for patients with a history of surgical delivery if they have a formation in the area of a postoperative scar and a cyclic pain symptom in its projection. Full Text About the authors Elena A. Baklygina Ryazan State Medical University Author for correspondence. Email: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1174-7719 Russian Federation, Ryazan Vadim V. Pchelintsev Ryazan State Medical University Email: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4718-628X MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor Russian Federation, RyazanAleksey V. Markin City Clinical Hospital No. 8 Email: [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5497-5175 Russian Federation, Ryazan

- Klinicheskiye rekomendatsii. Endometrioz. 2020. Available at: https://roag-portal.ru/recommendations_gynecology. Accessed: 2023 August 28. (In Russ). - Tomassetti C, Bafort C, Meuleman C, et al. Reproducibility of the Endometriosis Fertility Index: a prospective inter-/intra- rater agreement study. BJOG. 2020;127(1):107–14. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15880 - Anglesio MS, Yong PJ. Endometriosis-associated Ovarian Cancers. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(4):711–27. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000 000000000320 - Tangri MK, Lele P, Bal H, et al. Scar endometriosis: A series of 3 cases. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016;72(Suppl 1):S185–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.07.002 - Parazzini F, Esposito G, Tozzi L, et al. Epidemiology of endometriosis and its comorbidities. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 209:3–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.021 - Tatli F, Gozeneli O, Uyanikoglu H, et al. The clinical characteristics and surgical approach of scar endometriosis: A case series of 14 women. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2018;18(3):275–8. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2018.2659 - Buyanova SN, Glebov TA, Babunashvili EL, et al. Endometriosis of the anterior abdominal wall, perineum and vagina. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2022;22(5):43–8. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/rosakush20222206143 - Komlichenko EV, Tsnobiladze IG, Tsibizova VI, et al. Endometriosis of the anterior abdominal wall: ultrasound imaging data. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2021;15(2):201–7. (In Russ). doi: 10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2021.224 - Kiselev MA, Repina NB. Non-invasive diagnostics of endo-metriosis: review of modern biomarkers of peripheral blood and endometrium. I. P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2020;28(3):371–6. (In Russ). doi: 10.23888/PAVLOVJ2020283 371-376 - Zhang J, Liu X. Clinicopathological features of endometriosis in abdominal wall — clinical analysis of 151 cases. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2016;43(3):379–83. - Zhang P, Sun Y, Zhang C, et al. Cesarean scar endometriosis: presentation of 198 cases and literature review. BMC Women’s Health. 2019;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0711-8 - Cozzolino M, Coccia ME, Lazzeri G, et al. Variables Associated with Endometriosis-related Pain: A Pilot Study using a Visual Analogue Scale. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019;41(3):170–5. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1679879 - Kocher M, Hardie A, Schaefer A, et al. Cesarean-Section Scar Endometrioma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Radiol Case Rep. 2017;11(12):16–26. doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v11i12.3178 - Benedetto C, Cacozza D, de Sousa Costa D, et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis: Report of 83 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(2):530–6. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14167 - Van den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: State of the art. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;51:16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn. 2018.01.013 - Horton JD, Dezee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon’s perspective and review of 445 cases. Am J Surg. 2008;196(2):207–12.doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.035 - Ozturk A, Kaya C, Bozkurtoglu H, et al. Scar Endometrioma: An Uncommon Yet Easily Treated Condition. J Reprod Med. 2016;61(5–6):249–53.