Stem cell therapy-based approaches in experimental endometriosis: a systematic review

other OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-17 · read from full text

This PRISMA-guided systematic review synthesized 20 preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies (published 2015 to February 11, 2025) evaluating stem cell–based therapies and stem cell-derived products in experimental endometriosis models, extracting information on model types, cell sources, biomarkers, and outcomes. Most studies used murine in vivo models induced by intraperitoneal injection of uterine tissue, with adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and bone marrow–mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) being the most commonly tested cell sources; consistently analyzed biomarkers included VEGFA, TNFA, metalloproteinases (MMPs), and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway components, assessed mainly by PCR and immunohistochemistry. Overall, 72 of 92 reported outcomes were positive, with ADSCs showing the most pronounced effects, while negative or neutral findings were less common and sometimes linked to ADSCs and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells. The review concludes that variability in models, cell types, and outcomes limits the strength of evidence despite generally improved lesion and inflammatory pathway readouts, and emphasizes the need for more standardized, rigorous preclinical research, and for translation to future clinical practice. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it systematically reviews stem cell therapy-based approaches across experimental endometriosis models.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stem cell-based therapies have emerged as a promising approach for endometriosis due to their regenerative and immunomodulatory properties. Although numerous preclinical studies have reported beneficial effects, no systematic synthesis has yet evaluated their impact, the models employed and associated biomarkers. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to synthesise all available preclinical evidence (both in vitro and in vivo) assessing stem cell-based therapies and stem cell-derived products in experimental models of endometriosis. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from 1 January 2015 up to 11 February 2025. Preclinical studies (in vitro and in vivo) evaluating stem cell-based therapies in experimental models of endometriosis were included. Data were extracted regarding the models employed, cell sources, analysed biomarkers and reported cellular outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty preclinical studies were included, employing a wide range of in vitro models (most commonly endometriotic cells) and predominantly murine in vivo models induced by intraperitoneal injection of uterine tissue. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) were the most frequently investigated cell sources. Across the studies, VEGFA, TNFA, metalloproteinases (MMPs) and components of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway were the most consistently analysed biomarkers, primarily assessed by PCR and immunohistochemistry. Overall, 72 of the 92 reported outcomes were positive, with ADSCs demonstrating the most pronounced therapeutic effects and being characterised by their immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and regenerative activity. Negative or neutral findings, such as increased cellular adhesion and invasion, were limited and largely associated with ADSCs and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs). CONCLUSIONS: Stem cell-based therapies demonstrate promising effects in experimental endometriosis, with most studies reporting improvements in lesion characteristics and inflammatory pathways. However, substantial variability in models, cell types and outcomes limits the strength of current evidence. More standardised and rigorous preclinical research is needed to confirm these findings and support the translation of stem cell therapy-based approaches into future clinical practice.
Full text 22,598 characters · extracted from oa-html · 7 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Stem cell-based therapies have emerged as a promising approach for endometriosis due to their regenerative and immunomodulatory properties. Although numerous preclinical studies have reported beneficial effects, no systematic synthesis has yet evaluated their impact, the models employed and associated biomarkers. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to synthesise all available preclinical evidence (both in vitro and in vivo) assessing stem cell-based therapies and stem cell-derived products in experimental models of endometriosis.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from 1 January 2015 up to 11 February 2025. Preclinical studies (in vitro and in vivo) evaluating stem cell-based therapies in experimental models of endometriosis were included. Data were extracted regarding the models employed, cell sources, analysed biomarkers and reported cellular outcomes.

Results

Twenty preclinical studies were included, employing a wide range of in vitro models (most commonly endometriotic cells) and predominantly murine in vivo models induced by intraperitoneal injection of uterine tissue. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) were the most frequently investigated cell sources. Across the studies, VEGFA, TNFA, metalloproteinases (MMPs) and components of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway were the most consistently analysed biomarkers, primarily assessed by PCR and immunohistochemistry. Overall, 72 of the 92 reported outcomes were positive, with ADSCs demonstrating the most pronounced therapeutic effects and being characterised by their immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and regenerative activity. Negative or neutral findings, such as increased cellular adhesion and invasion, were limited and largely associated with ADSCs and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs).

Conclusions

Stem cell-based therapies demonstrate promising effects in experimental endometriosis, with most studies reporting improvements in lesion characteristics and inflammatory pathways. However, substantial variability in models, cell types and outcomes limits the strength of current evidence. More standardised and rigorous preclinical research is needed to confirm these findings and support the translation of stem cell therapy-based approaches into future clinical practice. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability The datasets obtained during the present review are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Abbreviations - ADSCs: - Adipose-derived stem cells - BMMSCs: - Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells - COX-2: - Cyclooxygenase-2 - ELISA: - Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay - eMSCs: - Endometrial mesenchymal stem cells - ERβ: - Oestrogen receptor beta - GnRH: - Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone - HUVEC: - Human umbilical vein endothelial cells - IF: - Immunofluorescence - IHC: - Immunohistochemistry - MenSCs: - Menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells - MMPs : - Metalloproteinases - NO: - Nitric oxide - N.S.: - Number of studies - NSAIDs: - Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs - PCR: - Polymerase Chain Reaction - PRISMA: - Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - TAC: - Total antioxidant capacity - TUNEL: - Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labelling - UCMSCs: - Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells - WB: - Western blotting - WJSCs: - Wharton's jelly stem cells

References

WHO. Endometriosis. 2023. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/endometriosis. Chen Y, Waseem S, Luo L, Urban & Fischer. Advances in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis: a comprehensive review. Pathol Res Pract. 2025;266:155813. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PRP.2025.155813. Taylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA, Elsevier. Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations. Lancet. 2021;397:839–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00389-5. Garvey M, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). Endometriosis: future biological perspectives for diagnosis and treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:12242. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS252212242. Chapron C, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Santulli P, Nature Publishing Group. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(11):666–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0245-z. Pascoal E, Wessels JM, Aas-Eng MK, Abrao MS, Condous G, Jurkovic D, et al. Strengths and limitations of diagnostic tools for endometriosis and relevance in diagnostic test accuracy research. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60:309–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/UOG.24892. (John Wiley and Sons Ltd). Moein Mahini S, Younesi M, Mortazavi G, Samare-Najaf M, Karim Azadbakht M, Jamali N. Non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis: immunologic and genetic markers. Clin Chim Acta. 2023;538:70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2022.11.013. Corte PD, Klinghardt M, Stockum S, Heinemann K, John Wiley and Sons Inc. Time to diagnose endometriosis: current status, challenges and regional characteristics—a systematic literature review. BJOG. 2024;132:118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17973. Piriyev E, Schiermeier S, Römer T, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. Hormonal treatment of endometriosis: a narrative review. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18:588. https://doi.org/10.3390/PH18040588. Brichant G, Nervo P, Albert A, Munaut C, Foidart JM, Nisolle M, et al. Heterogeneity of estrogen receptor α and progesterone receptor distribution in lesions of deep infiltrating endometriosis of untreated women or during exposure to various hormonal treatments. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018;34:651–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2018.1433160. Műzes G, Sipos F. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived secretome: a potential therapeutic option for autoimmune and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Cells. 2022;11:2300. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11152300. Nematizadeh M, Payab M, Gholami M, Arjmand B, Larijani B, Tayanloo-Beik A. Preclinical studies for development of biomedical products. In: Arjmand B, Payab M, Goodarzi P, editors. Biomedical product development: bench to bedside. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35626-2_5. Cited 2025 June 12 Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RBM, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-43. Sheth VH, Shah NP, Jain R, Bhanushali N, Bhatnagar V. Development and validation of a risk-of-bias tool for assessing in vitro studies conducted in dentistry: the QUIN. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131:1038–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.019.

Methods

Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK47095/. Accessed 23 Feb 2026. Cited 2026 Feb 23. Lundh A, Gøtzsche PC. Recommendations by Cochrane review groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-22. Li J, Peng X, Zeng X, Liu B, Hao Q, Yu X, et al. Estrogen secreted by mesenchymal stem cells necessarily determines their feasibility of therapeutical application. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15286. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15286. Mamengko LM, Hendarto H, Widjiati W. The effect of mesenchymal stem cell administration on the expression of nuclear factor kappa beta, neural growth factor expression, and prostaglandin E2 concentration as determinants of pain in a mouse model of endometriosis. Trends Sci. 2024;21:8394. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2024.8394. Dwiningsih SR, Hendarto H, Rantam FA, Dachlan EG, Widjiati W, Wiyasa IWA. Mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in endometriosis model mice on VEGF mRNA expression to improve infertility. J Int Dent Med Res. 2021;14:1196–201. https://www.jidmr.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/53-M21_1500_Widjiati_Indonesia.pdf Falomo ME, Ferroni L, Tocco I, Gardin C, Zavan B. Immunomodulatory role of adipose-derived stem cells on equine endometriosis. BioMed Res Intern. 2015;2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/141485. Abomaray F, Gidlöf S, Bezubik B, Engman M, Götherström C. Mesenchymal stromal cells support endometriotic stromal cells in vitro. Stem Cells Intern. 2018;2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7318513. Kalehoei E, Moradi M, Azadbakht M, Zhaleh H, Abadi SAL, Mahdiuni H, et al. Therapeutic effects of L-arginine, L-carnitine, and mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium on endometriosis-induced oocyte poor quality in an experimental mouse model. J Obstetr Gynaecol Res 2023;49. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15569. Mulyantoro I, Noerpramana NP, Febrianto YH, Widjiati W, Purwati P, Suhartono S, et al. Effect of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell on the expressions of bax/bcl-2, ki67, vegf, tnf-α, and endometrial implants in metformin-administered endometriosis mice (A mouse model in endometriosis study). Turkish J Immunol. 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.5222/TJI.2021.29292. Hirakawa T, Yotsumoto F, Shirasu N, Kiyoshima C, Urushiyama D, Yoshikawa K, et al. Trophic and immunomodulatory effects of adipose tissue derived stem cells in a preclinical murine model of endometriosis. Scient Rep 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11891-5. Huang SJ, Huang CY, Huang YH, Cheng JH, Yu YC, Lai JC, et al. A novel therapeutic approach for endometriosis using adipose-derived stem cell-derived conditioned medium- A new hope for endometriotic patients in improving fertility. Front Endocrinol 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1158527. Meligy FY, Elgamal DA, Abdelzaher LA, Khashbah MY, El-Mokhtar MA, Sayed AA, et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce endometriosis cellular proliferation through their anti-inflammatory effects. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2021;48. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2021.04357. Wong YS, Mançanares AC, Navarrete F, Poblete P, Mendez-Pérez L, Cabezas J, et al. Extracellular vesicles secreted by equine adipose mesenchymal stem cells preconditioned with transforming growth factor β-1 are enriched in anti-fibrotic miRNAs and inhibit the expression of fibrotic genes in an in vitro system of endometrial stromal cells fibrosis. Vet Q. 2024;44:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2024.2384906. (Taylor and Francis Ltd). Amaral VFD, Maestrelli P de C, Francisco JC, Guarita-Souza LC, Kondo W, Noronha L, et al. Bone marrow derived mononuclear stromal cells and experimental model of deep endometriosis. Intern J Clin Exp Pathol. 2016;9(2):1116–26. https://e-century.us/web/journal_search.php?journal=ijcep&q=Bone%20marrow%20derived%20mononuclear%20stromal%20cells%20and%20experimental%20model%20of%20deep%20endometriosis Dwiningsih SR, Darmosoekarto S, Hendarto H, Dachlan EG, Rantam FA, Sunarjo S, et al. Effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor 1 expression, granulosa cell apoptosis, and folliculogenesis repair in endometriosis mouse models. Vet World. 2021;14. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.1788-1796. Habata S, Mamillapalli R, Ucar A, Taylor HS. Donor mesenchymal stem cells program bone marrow, altering macrophages, and suppressing endometriosis in mice. Stem Cells Intern 2023;2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1598127. Kalehoei E, Moradi M, Azadbakht M, Zhaleh H, Parvini M, Cheraghbaeigi S, et al. In vitro maturation medium supplementation: Utilization of repaglinide, L-carnitine, and mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium to improve developmental competence of oocytes derived from endometriosis mouse models. Braz J Med Biol Res 2022;55. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X2022e11948. Gopalakrishnan ARK, Pandit H, Metkari SM, Warty N, Madan T. Adenoviral vector encoding soluble Flt-1 engineered human endometrial mesenchymal stem cells effectively regress endometriotic lesions in NOD/SCID mice. Gene Ther 2016;23. https://doi.org/10.1038/gt.2016.30. Wu D, Lu P, Mi X, Miao J. Exosomal miR-214 from endometrial stromal cells inhibits endometriosis fibrosis. Mol Hum Reprod 2018;24. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gay019. Cheng Y, Guo Q, Cheng Y, Wang D, Sun L, Liang T, et al. Endostatin-expressing endometrial mesenchymal stem cells inhibit angiogenesis in endometriosis through the miRNA-21-5p/TIMP3/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Stem Cells Transl Med. Oxford University Press; 2025;14. https://doi.org/10.1093/STCLTM/SZAE079. Chen Y, Li D, Zhang Z, Takushige N, Kong BH, Wang GY. Effect of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells transplantation on nerve fibers of a rat model of endometriosis. Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;9(1):71–80. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2015.4211. Tsuji S, Mukai T, Tsuchiya H, Iwatani C, Nakamura A, Nagamura-Inoue T, et al. Impact of administering umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells to cynomolgus monkeys with endometriosis. Reprod Med Biol 2023;22. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12540. Xu LN, Lin N, Xu BN, Li JB, Chen SQ. Effect of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells on endometriotic cell proliferation and apoptosis. Genet Mol Res 2015;14. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.December.11.2. Hajazimian S, Maleki M, Mehrabad SD, Isazadeh A. Human Wharton’s jelly stem cells inhibit endometriosis through apoptosis induction. Reproduction. 2020;159. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-19-0597. Sahraei SS, Kowsari A, Asl FD, Sheykhhasan M, Naserpoor L, Sheikholeslami A. Evaluating the effect of conditioned medium from endometrial stem cells on endometriosis-derived endometrial stem cells. Anatomy Cell Biol. 2022;55. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.21.169. Cen J, Zhang Y, Bai Y, Ma S, Zhang C, Jin L, et al. Research progress of stem cell therapy for endometrial injury. Mater Today Bio. 2022;16:100389. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTBIO.2022.100389. Gołąbek-Grenda A, Olejnik A. In vitro modeling of endometriosis and endometriotic microenvironment – Challenges and recent advances. Cell Signall. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2022.110375. Li J, Settivari RS, LeBaron MJ. Genetic instability of in vitro cell lines: Implications for genetic toxicity testing. Environ Mol Mutagen 2019;60. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22280. Taniguchi F, Wibisono H, Khine YM, Harada T. Animal models for research on endometriosis. Front Biosci Elite. 2021;26:37–53. https://doi.org/10.2741/871/PDF. He Y, Liang B, Hung SW, Zhang R, Xu H, Chung JPW, et al. Re-evaluation of mouse models of endometriosis for pathological and immunological research. Front Immunol Front Media SA. 2022;13:986202. https://doi.org/10.3389/FIMMU.2022.986202/BIBTEX. Black V, Bafligil C, Greaves E, Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Hellner K. Modelling endometriosis using in vitro and in vivo systems. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(2):580. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS26020580. Istrate-Ofiţeru AM, Mogoantă CA, Zorilă GL, Roşu GC, Drăguşin RC, Berbecaru EIA, et al. Clinical characteristics and local histopathological modulators of endometriosis and its progression. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS25031789. Yi F, Yang L, Wang S, Guo L, Huang C, Xie Y, et al. Microvessel prediction in H&E Stained Pathology Images using fully convolutional neural networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2055-z. Pant A, Moar K, Arora T, Maurya PK. Biomarkers of endometriosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2023;549:117563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2023.117563. Hua M, Wang Y, Yao J, Zhu Z, Liu X, Meng F, et al. Analysis of inflammatory biomarkers IL-6, vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinases-9 expression in endometriosis. SAGE Open Med. 2025;13:20503121251321624. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121251321625. Chen Q, Qiu N, Pu D, Zhou Y, Li T, Yang H. Change profiles in matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in induced endometriosis in mice. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci. 2010;30:188–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11596-010-0211-4/METRICS. Madanes D, Bilotas MA, Bastón JI, Singla JJ, Meresman GF, Barañao RI, et al. PI3K/AKT pathway is altered in the endometriosis patient’s endometrium and presents differences according to severity stage. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36:436–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2019.1680627. Li C, Zhao HL, Li YJ, Zhang YY, Liu HY, Feng FZ, et al. The expression and significance of leukemia inhibitory factor, interleukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor in Chinese patients with endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstetr. 2021;304:163–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00404-021-05980-5/TABLES/5. (Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH). Brulport A, Bourdon M, Vaiman D, Drouet C, Pocate-Cheriet K, Bouzid K, et al. An integrated multi-tissue approach for endometriosis candidate biomarkers: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024;22(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12958-023-01181-8. Suchanecka M, Grzelak J, Farzaneh M, Azizidoost S, Dari MAG, Józkowiak M, et al. Adipose derived stem cells - sources, differentiation capacity and a new target for reconstructive and regenerative medicine. Biomed Pharmacother. 2025;186:118036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118036. Sabol RA, Bowles AC, Côté A, Wise R, Pashos N, Bunnell BA. Therapeutic potential of adipose stem cells. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1341:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2018_248. Aithal AP, Bairy LK, Seetharam RN. Safety and therapeutic potential of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Investig. 2021;8:10. https://doi.org/10.21037/sci-2020-036. He Y, Han Y, Ye Y. Therapeutic potential of menstrual blood-derived stem cell transplantation for intrauterine adhesions. Front Surg. 2022;9:847213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.847213. Lee YJ, Yi KW. Bone marrow-derived stem cells contribute to regeneration of the endometrium. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2018;45:149–53. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2018.45.4.149. Driva TS, Schatz C, Haybaeck J. Endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas: how PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway affects their pathogenesis. Biomolecules. 2023;13:1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13081253. Namini MS, Beheshtizadeh N, Ebrahimi-Barough S, Ai J. Human endometrial stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles enhance neurite outgrowth and peripheral nerve regeneration through activating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. J Transl Med. 2025;23:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-024-06048-z. Kalamegam G, Sait KHW, Ahmed F, Kadam R, Pushparaj PN, Anfinan N, et al. Human Wharton’s jelly stem cell (hWJSC) extracts inhibit ovarian cancer cell lines OVCAR3 and SKOV3 in vitro by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Front Oncol. 2018;8:592. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00592. García-Bernal D, García-Arranz M, Yáñez RM, Hervás-Salcedo R, Cortés A, Fernández-García M, et al. The current status of mesenchymal stromal cells: controversies, unresolved issues and some promising solutions to improve their therapeutic efficacy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:650664. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.650664. Saeed Y, Liu X. Mesenchymal stem cells to treat female infertility; future perspective and challenges: a review. Intern J Reprod BioMedicine (IJRM). 2022;20:709. https://doi.org/10.18502/IJRM.V20I9.12061. Chatzianagnosti S, Dermitzakis I, Theotokis P, Kousta E, Mastorakos G, Manthou ME. Application of mesenchymal stem cells in female infertility treatment: protocols and preliminary results. Life. 2024;14:1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/LIFE14091161. Stone JC, Leonardi-Bee J, Barker TH, Sears K, Klugar M, Munn Z, et al. Common tool structures and approaches to risk of bias assessment: implications for systematic reviewers. JBI Evid Synth. 2024;22:389–93. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00463.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to sincerely thank Nuria González for her invaluable assistance in the design, preparation, and improvement of the figures included in this manuscript. Funding This research was funded by: Plan Complementario de Biotecnología Aplicada a la Salud, co-financed by the Ministry of Science and Innovation with funds from the European Union's NextGenerationEU initiative; by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through RICORS/TERAV (RD21/0017/0014) supported by European Union's NextGenerationEU and Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan, by Consejería de Educación, Ciencia y Formación Profesional of the Junta de Extremadura (GR24210), co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and with support to I. Suárez-Carrasco from MAFRESA, EL IBÉRICO DE CONFIANZA SL. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions I. Suárez-Carrasco and E. López: conceptualisation, methodology, literature search, data extraction and formal analysis. M.A. De Pedro, M. Pulido and V. Álvarez: writing (review and editing). F.M. Sánchez-Margallo: supervision, project administration and funding acquisition. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. About this article Cite this article Suárez-Carrasco, I., De Pedro, M., Pulido, M. et al. Stem cell therapy-based approaches in experimental endometriosis: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-026-01553-w Received: Accepted: Published: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-026-01553-w

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Stem Cell Transplantation Stem Cell Transplantation Stem Cell Transplantation Stem Cell Transplantation Stem Cell Transplantation Animals Animals Animals Animals Disease Models, Animal Disease Models, Animal Disease Models, Animal Disease Models, Animal Female Female

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-01T06:12:12.862213+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-07-01T06:07:34.800835+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine