Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy
review
OA: green
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This review found low-certainty evidence that progesterone and norethisterone do not differ from placebo for catamenial epilepsy, but further underpowered trials suggest effects cannot be ruled out.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Catamenial epilepsy describes a worsening of seizures in relation to the menstrual cycle and may affect around 40% of women with epilepsy. Vulnerable days of the menstrual cycle for seizures are perimenstrually (C1 pattern), at ovulation (C2 pattern), and during the luteal phase (C3 pattern). A reduction in progesterone levels premenstrually and reduced secretion during the luteal phase is implicated in catamenial C1 and C3 patterns. A reduction in progesterone has been demonstrated to reduce sensitivity to the inhibitory neurotransmitter in preclinical studies, hence increasing risk of seizures. A pre-ovulatory surge in oestrogen has been implicated in the C2 pattern of seizure exacerbation, although the exact mechanism by which this surge increases risk is uncertain. Current treatment practices include the use of pulsed hormonal (e.g. progesterone) and non-hormonal treatments (e.g. clobazam or acetazolamide) in women with regular menses, and complete cessation of menstruation using synthetic hormones (e.g. medroxyprogesterone (Depo-Provera) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues (triptorelin and goserelin)) in women with irregular menses.Catamenial epilepsy and seizure exacerbation is common in women with epilepsy, and may have a significant negative impact on quality of life. Women may not be receiving appropriate treatment for their seizures because of uncertainty regarding which treatment works best and when in the menstrual cycle treatment should be taken, as well as the possible impact on fertility, the menstrual cycle, bone health, and cardiovascular health. This review aimed to address these issues in order to inform clinical practice and future research. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of hormonal and non-hormonal treatments for seizures exacerbated by the menstrual cycle in women with regular or irregular menses. We synthesised the evidence from randomised controlled trials of hormonal and non-hormonal treatments in women with catamenial epilepsy of any pattern. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases to 10 January 2019: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web; includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)), MEDLINE (Ovid: 1946 to 9 January 2019), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We used no language restrictions. We checked the reference lists of retrieved studies for additional reports of relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of blinded or opeṉlabel design that randomised participants individually (i.e. cluster-randomised trials were excluded). We included cross-over trials if each treatment period was at least 12 weeks in length and the trial had a suitable wash-out period. Types of interventions included: women with any pattern of catamenial epilepsy who received a hormonal or non-hormonal drug intervention in addition to an existing antiepileptic drug regimen for a minimum treatment duration of 12 weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data on study design factors and participant demographics for the included studies. The primary outcomes of interest were: proportion seizure-free, proportion of responders (at least 50% decrease in seizure frequency from baseline), and mean change in seizure frequency. Secondary outcomes included: number of withdrawals, number of women experiencing adverse events of interest (seizure exacerbation, cardiac events, thromboembolic events, osteoporosis and bone health, mood disorders, sedation, menstrual cycle disorders, and fertility issues), and quality of life outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: = 0%). No treatment withdrawals from the norethisterone RCTs were reported. The RCTs reported limited information on adverse events, although one progesterone RCT reported no significant difference in the number of women experiencing adverse events (diarrhoea, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, nasopharyngitis, dizziness, headache, and depression). No studies reported on quality of life.We judged the evidence from the included progesterone RCTs to be of low to moderate certainty due to risk of bias and from the included norethisterone RCTs to be of very low certainty due to serious imprecision and risk of bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review provides very low-certainty evidence of no treatment difference between norethisterone and placebo, and moderate- to low-certainty evidence of no treatment difference between progesterone and placebo for catamenial epilepsy. However, as all the included studies were underpowered, important clinical effects cannot be ruled out.Our review highlighted an overall deficiency in the literature base on the effectiveness of a wide range of other hormonal and non-hormonal interventions currently being used in practice, particularly for those patients who do not have regular menses. Further clinical trials are needed in this area.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
- The effect of a synthetic GnRH analogue on catamenial epilepsy: a study in ten patients 1992
- Treatments for peri-menstrual seizures in catamenial epilepsy 2018
- Treatments for peri-menstrual seizures in catamenial epilepsy 2018
Cited by (2)
References (76)
- The effect of a synthetic GnRH analogue on catamenial epilepsy: a study in ten patients via openalex
- Treatments for peri-menstrual seizures in catamenial epilepsy via openalex
- Treatments for peri-menstrual seizures in catamenial epilepsy via crossref
- W1551781691 via openalex
- W1932154717 via openalex
- W1969836710 via openalex
- W1970989600 via openalex
- W1987034237 via openalex
- W1999336422 via openalex
- W2007884033 via openalex
- W2013722076 via openalex
- W2022764608 via openalex
- W2027351733 via openalex
- W2046566032 via openalex
- W2049710739 via openalex
- W2056154551 via openalex
- W2059542358 via openalex
- W2061549777 via openalex
- W2064543052 via openalex
- W2067638295 via openalex
- W2091306609 via openalex
- W2091757374 via openalex
- W2095512836 via openalex
- W2103024352 via openalex
- W2112264559 via openalex
- W2121403142 via openalex
- W2121587872 via openalex
- W2127146014 via openalex
- W2130235475 via openalex
- W2142169831 via openalex
- W2145341481 via openalex
- W2156098321 via openalex
- W2320816109 via openalex
- W2413241692 via openalex
- W2473482436 via openalex
- W2589648781 via openalex
- W4233635697 via openalex
- W4256513592 via openalex
- W6608047265 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1983.tb04901.x via crossref
- doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e318259e1f9 via crossref
- doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000623 via crossref
- doi:10.4103/2277-9175.107974 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91691-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/jnnp.47.12.1279 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/epi.13705 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/jnnp.49.1.47 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 via crossref
- doi:10.1007/bf00810354 via crossref
- doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.140 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.037 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)92354-5 via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1997.tb01197.x via crossref
- doi:10.1212/wnl.57.11.2133 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600211 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(02)04065-9 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01287-1 via crossref
- doi:10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.t01-1-26901.x via crossref
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(56)90003-4 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4688-08.2009 via crossref
- doi:10.1038/nn1469 via crossref
- doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2785 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.08.016 via crossref
- W15119525 via openalex
- doi:10.1124/jpet.104.065268 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2014.06.010 via crossref
- doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-26 via crossref
- doi:10.1136/jnnp.61.5.433 via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4161-10.2010 via crossref
- doi:10.1016/0920-1211(91)90084-s via crossref
- doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb01553.x via crossref
- doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-12-07680.1994 via crossref
- doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181ae7adf via crossref
- W195924149 via openalex
- W1247968195 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- crossref
- last seen: 2026-05-10T19:04:18.443090+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK