Understanding AI’s Role in Endometriosis Patient Education and Evaluating Its Information and Accuracy: Systematic Review (Preprint)

preprint OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06

This systematic review of three studies found that AI tools, including large language models, can provide accurate answers to endometriosis-related questions, though sufficiency varies and ethical considerations remain.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06 · read from full text

This systematic review used PRISMA-guided methods to search PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL for studies using artificial intelligence (e.g., ChatGPT, machine learning, natural language processing) to support endometriosis patient education or information dissemination, including evaluations of tools assessing patient knowledge and addressing frequently asked questions. From 223 records, 10 studies were initially eligible, but only 3 were fully included (one as an abstract), and the reviewed work reported that large language models could provide accurate answers to common endometriosis questions with varying sufficiency across categories, with social media integration noted as a potential way to identify patient needs. The authors state limitations related to ethical use, equitable access, and maintaining accuracy across diverse patient populations, and they call for standardized evaluation approaches and future work on integration into practice. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it systematically reviews AI tools for endometriosis patient education and the accuracy of their information.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition that affects a significant portion of women of reproductive age, leading to debilitating symptoms such as chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Despite advancements in diagnosis and management, patient education remains a critical challenge. With the rapid growth of digital platforms, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential tool to enhance patient education and access to information. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to explore the role of AI in facilitating education and improving information accessibility for individuals with endometriosis. METHODS This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure rigorous and transparent reporting. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed; Embase; the Regional Online Information System for Scientific Journals of Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal (LATINDEX); Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS); Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using the terms “endometriosis” and “artificial intelligence.” Studies were selected based on their focus on AI applications in patient education or information dissemination regarding endometriosis. We included studies that evaluated AI-driven tools for assessing patient knowledge and addressed frequently asked questions related to endometriosis. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by 2 authors, with discrepancies resolved through consensus. RESULTS Out of 400 initial search results, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria and were fully reviewed. We ultimately included 3 studies, 1 of which was an abstract. The studies examined the use of AI models, such as ChatGPT (OpenAI), machine learning, and natural language processing, in providing educational resources and answering common questions about endometriosis. The findings indicated that AI tools, particularly large language models, offer accurate responses to frequently asked questions with varying degrees of sufficiency across different categories. AI’s integration with social media platforms also highlights its potential to identify patients’ needs and enhance information dissemination. CONCLUSIONS AI holds promise in advancing patient education and information access for endometriosis, providing accurate and comprehensive answers to common queries, and facilitating a better understanding of the condition. However, challenges remain in ensuring ethical use, equitable access, and maintaining accuracy across diverse patient populations. Future research should focus on developing standardized approaches for evaluating AI’s impact on patient education and exploring its integration into clinical practice to enhance support for individuals with endometriosis.
Full text 3,403 characters · extracted from oa-html · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition affecting a significant portion of women of reproductive age, leading to debilitating symptoms such as chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Despite advancements in diagnosis and management, patient education remains a critical challenge. With the rapid growth of digital platforms, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential tool to enhance patient education and access to information.

Objective

This systematic review explores the role of AI in facilitating education and improving information accessibility for individuals with endometriosis.

Methods

This systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure rigorous and transparent reporting. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using the terms "endometriosis" and "artificial intelligence." Studies were selected based on their focus on AI applications in patient education or information dissemination regarding endometriosis. We included studies that evaluated AI-driven tools for assessing patient knowledge and addressed frequently asked questions related to endometriosis. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two authors, with discrepancies resolved through consensus.

Results

Out of 223 initial search results, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were fully reviewed. Three studies were ultimately included, with one being an abstract. The studies examined the use of AI models such as ChatGPT, machine learning, and natural language processing in providing educational resources and answering common questions about endometriosis. The findings indicate that AI tools, particularly large language models, offer accurate responses to frequently asked questions, with varying degrees of sufficiency across different categories. AI's integration with social media platforms also highlights its potential to identify patients' needs and enhance information dissemination.

Conclusions

AI holds promise in advancing patient education and information access for endometriosis, providing accurate and comprehensive answers to common queries and facilitating a better understanding of the condition. However, challenges remain in ensuring ethical use, equitable access, and maintaining accuracy across diverse patient populations. Future research should focus on developing standardized approaches for evaluating AI's impact on patient education and exploring its integration into clinical practice to enhance support for individuals with endometriosis. Citation Per the author's request the PDF is not available. Copyright © The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_paininfertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (26)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T05:15:36.243460+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK