Functional and Surgical Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Approaches in Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Review OA: closed public-domain-us
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-25 ⓘ

This meta-analysis of 1,623 women with deep infiltrating endometriosis found that nerve-sparing surgery is feasible with low complication rates and acceptable functional outcomes, though heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical safety and functional outcomes of nerve-sparing surgery in the management of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and LILACS were searched from January 2000 to August 2025 for studies evaluating nerve-sparing surgery in women with surgically confirmed DIE. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies included women with surgically confirmed DIE who underwent nerve-sparing procedures. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: Sixteen studies involving 1,623 women were included. The pooled conversion rate to open surgery was 0.3%, while intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were 1.5% and 9.8%, respectively. Urinary voiding dysfunction occurred in 6.9% of patients, and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome occurred in 10.2%. The pooled postoperative Female Sexual Function Index score was 22.3. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across several functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Nerve-sparing surgery for DIE appears feasible and is associated with acceptable surgical and functional outcomes. However, the current evidence is limited, and substantial heterogeneity precludes conclusions regarding equivalence or superiority compared with conventional surgery. Further well-designed prospective and comparative studies are needed.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (19)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-28T06:16:56.634860+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-10-28T06:07:52.114647+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-28T06:09:29.063481+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine