Results
- QUANTITATIVE RESULTS - QUALITATIVE
Discrepancies between perceived and actual Endometriosis
knowledge
Key predictors Endometriosis knowledge:
Menstrual knowledge (OR = 9.8; 95 %; CI: 0.6 – 3.9; p =
0.007)
Age (OR = 4.2; 95 %; CI: 0.2 – 2.6; p = 0.018)
University (OR = 1.3; 95 %; CI: 0.6 – 5.8; p = 0.017)
Internet (OR = 2.2; 95 %; CI: 0.03 – 1.5; p = 0.041)
8 % of the varience in Endometriosis is explained by the model
Enhanced awareness of menstrual health driven by digital
media
Younger generations exhibit fewer taboos and greater
openness due to growing up with more accessible
ressources
Increased Endometriosis awareness and knowledge due
to enhanced menstrual health awareness
Expanded information access may lead to misinformation
Hudelist, G., Fritzer, N., Thomas, A., Niehues, C., Oppelt, P., Haas, D., Tammaa, A., & Salzer, H. (2012). Diagnostic delay for endometriosis in Austria and Germany: Causes and possible consequences. Human Reproduction (Oxford,
England), 27(12), 3412–3416. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des316
Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2022). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung: Grundlagentexte Methoden (5. Auflage). Beltz Juventa.
Moritz, A., Bierschneider, B., Bambeck, M., Männel, N., & Röhrig, M. (2020, December). Basiswissen Endometriose. Endometriose-Vereinigung Deutschland e.V. https://www.uniklinik-duesseldorf.de/fileadmin/Fuer-Patienten-und
Besucher/Kliniken-ZentrenInstitute/Kliniken/Klinik_fuer_Frauenheilkunde_und_Geburtshilfe/Unsere%20Zentr THE ENDO GAP 90 en/Endometriose/Homepage_Neu/EVD_Broschuere_Basiswissen_Endometriose_ Webseite.pdf
National Cancer Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, & National Institutes of Health. (2005). Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice (Vol. 2).
Sarria-Santamera, A., Orazumbekova, B., Terzic, M., Issanov, A., Chaowen, C., & Asúnsolodel-Barco, A. (2020). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incidence and Prevalence of Endometriosis. Healthcare, 9(1), 29.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9010029
Wróbel, M., Wielgoś, M., & Laudański, P. (2022). Diagnostic delay of endometriosis in adults and adolescence-current stage of knowledge. Advances in Medical Sciences, 67(1), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advms.2022.02.003
Introduction
THE ENDO GAP
The current state of knowledge of menstruating people about Endometriosis in Germany
An exploratory mixed methods study
Discussion
CONCLUSION
Endometriosis is a common condition among menstruating
individuals (10 % global prevalence, up to 50 % involuntarily
childless) (Sarria-Santamera et al., 2020)
Approximately 40,000 new cases in Germany annually,
often under- and undiagnosed (Moritz et al., 2020)
Severe pain symptoms are frequently misinterpreted,
causing diagnostic delays of over ten years (Hudelist et al.,
2012; Wróbel et al., 2022)
Stigma, menstrual taboos, and pain normalisation hinder
diagnosis (Hudelist et al., 2012)
Need for research on public awareness of Endometriosis in
Germany
Research question:
What is the current (perceived) state of knowledge among
menstruating people in Germany regarding Endometriosis?
Three key aspects are central to understanding Endometriosis knowledge and awareness:
Influence of menstrual knowledge:1.
Increased focus on menstrual health has led more young people to seek professional
consultation
a.
Increased awareness towards gynecological diseases like Endometriosisb.
Need for improving understanding through enhanced educational programsc.
Influence of generational differences:2.
Increased engagement and awareness among Gen Z populationa.
Increased desire of knowledge regarding menstrual healthb.
Increased risk of misunderstanding due to disease’s complexity (underestimation)c.
Influence of digital media:3.
Increased visibility and information availability through social media platformsa.
Increased risk of content credibility due to lack of professional informationb.
Increased involvement of medical professionals neededc.
Multifaceted approach needed:
Public campaigns and discussions
addressing societal taboos
Further research analysing:
Most effective information
sources within different
demographics
Perception and influence of
healthcare providers
Endometriosis awareness
among Gen Z and younger
Long-term impacts of
Endometriosis knowledge and
awareness
References
METHOD
Study Design: Mixed methods research with a cross-sectional sample
combined with semi-structured expert interviews
Sample & Recruitment: Active and passive recruitment was carried
out through the Snowball Method using Social Media platforms and
medical centres. For the quantitative part a sample of N = 316
(average age of 30; SD = .779) was collected and four expert interviews
were conducted.
Instruments & Analyses: Participants of the quantitatve phase of the
study filled out an online questionnaire based on the Health Belief
Model (National Cancer Institute, 2005) to analyse their perceived and
actual knowledge on Endometriosis. Descriptive statistics and ordinal
logistic regression assessed current Endometriosis knowledge. The
subsequent qualitative phase involved expert interviews, with analysis
guided by Kuckartz and Rädicker's (2022) qualitative content analysis
method.
Keywords
Endometriosis, Menstruation, Gender Data Gap, Gender Health Gap, Gender-Awareness, Menstrual Knowledge, Health Behaviour
Mieke van den Akker , Franziska von Mandelsloh , Prof. Dr Johanna Buchcik
University of Applied Sciences (HAW) Hamburg, Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Health Sciences
University of Applied Sciences (HAW) Hamburg, Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, Department Nursing and Management
1 12
1
2