Flushing the endometrium prior to the embryo transfer does not affect the pregnancy rate
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This study investigated the impact of endometrial flushing before embryo transfer on pregnancy rates and found no significant difference between the flushing and non-flushing groups.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether direct flushing of endometrial cavity with culture media just after cervical irrigation at the time of embryo transfer has any effect on pregnancy rates. A total of 240 women were prospectively randomised; one group of patients (group 1) underwent intrauterine direct flushing of endometrial cavity with culture media just after cervical irrigation at the time of embryo transfer as detected by transabdominal ultrasound and the other group of patients (group 2) had cervical flushing but did not undergo intrauterine flushing. Pregnancy (positive human chorionic gonadotrophin) rates were 57.5% and 62.9% for group 1 and group 2, respectively. Clinical pregnancy (positive fetal heart rate) rates were 45.2% and 51.4% for group 1 and group 2, respectively. Implantation rates were 20.0% and 21.2% for group 1 and group 2, respectively. Ongoing pregnancy (>12 weeks of pregnancy) rates were 47.9% and 47.2% for group 1 and group 2, respectively. There were no significant differences in pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates and ongoing pregnancy rates between the two groups. In conclusion, even direct flushing of media into the uterine cavity neither improves nor adversely affects the pregnancy rate.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
- Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity 1997
- Implantation markers and endometriosis 2005
- Recurrent implantation failure in assisted reproduction: how to counsel and manage. A. General considerations and treatment options that may benefit the couple 2005
Cited by (1)
References (22)
- Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity via openalex
- Implantation markers and endometriosis via openalex
- Recurrent implantation failure in assisted reproduction: how to counsel and manage. A. General considerations and treatment options that may benefit the couple via openalex
- W1996003820 via openalex
- W2026230154 via openalex
- W2026938634 via openalex
- W2027123355 via openalex
- W2049426088 via openalex
- W2059976790 via openalex
- W2085579042 via openalex
- W2095256410 via openalex
- W2106765271 via openalex
- W2141724110 via openalex
- W2146659045 via openalex
- W2169681344 via openalex
- W2176403835 via openalex
- W2243228036 via openalex
- W2276605788 via openalex
- W1902388849 via openalex
- W4239965704 via openalex
- W1965181820 via openalex
- W1972277658 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK