The efficacy of presacral neurectomy for the relief of midline dysmenorrhea

rct OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to evaluate prospectively the efficacy of presacral neurectomy for the treatment of midline dysmenorrhea. All patients had moderate to severe dysmenorrhea and stage III-IV endometriosis. Of the patients undergoing presacral neurectomy (N = 17), only two had a recurrence of pain. The remainder of the patients undergoing presacral neurectomy remain pain-free at 42 months of follow-up. Of the patients undergoing resection of endometriosis but not presacral neurectomy (N = 9), none received relief of midline pain. Relief of lateral pain, back pain, and dyspareunia was variable in both groups. Our findings corroborate previous retrospective studies showing that presacral neurectomy is highly effective in the treatment of dysmenorrhea. We speculate that the most common reasons for failure of presacral neurectomy are inappropriate selection of patients and incomplete resection of the presacral nerve plexus.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

dysmenorrheaendometriosisdyspareunia

MeSH descriptors

Dysmenorrhea Sympathectomy Adult Dysmenorrhea Dysmenorrhea Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Prospective Studies Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:12:10.587122+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-16T02:00:00.672124+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine