In the Spotlight

In: Reproductive Sciences · 2017 · vol. 24(2) , pp. 173 · doi:10.1177/1933719116682658 · W4234557103
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-10

This paper reviews research priorities and recommendations from international endometriosis research groups and consensus workshops.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

The article “In the Spotlight” (Maduro, 2017) is a brief publication that spotlights and contextualizes a set of cited works on endometriosis pathogenesis, clinical burden, research priorities, and experimental or therapeutic approaches. It draws on multiple sources including reviews of disease mechanisms and burden, discussions of surgical management for recurrent symptomatic endometriosis, and preclinical studies targeting pathways such as interleukin-6 signaling, MAPK/VEGFR, and transcriptional regulatory programs. The text provided does not include any explicit study methods, original data, or limitations specific to the “In the Spotlight” piece itself. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 2,536 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Article PDF References Burney R, Giudice L. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endo-metriosis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):511–519. Simoens S, Dunselman G, Dirksen C, et al. The burden of endome-triosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(5):1292–1299. Vercellini P, Barbara G, Abbiati A, Somigliana E, Vigano P, Fedele L. Repetitive surgery for recurrent symptomatic endometriosis: what to do? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146(1):15–21. Taskin M, Gungor A, Adali E, Yay A, Onder G, Inceboz U. A humanized anti-interleukin 6 receptor monoclonal antibody, toci-lizumab, for the treatment of endometriosis in a rat model. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(5):662–669. Tosti C, Pinzauti S, Santulli P, Chapron C, Petraglia F. Pathoge-netic mechanisms of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(9):1053–1059. Leconte M, Santulli P, Chouzenoux S, et al. Inhibition of MAPK and VEGFR by sorafenib controls the progression of endometrio-sis. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(9):1171–1180. Yang H, Kang K, Cheng C, Mamillapalli R, Taylor H. Integrative analysis reveals regulatory programs in endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(9):1060–1072. Zanatta A, Pereira R, Rocha A, et al. The relationship among HOXA10, estrogen receptor a, progesterone receptor, and progesterone receptor B proteins in rectosigmoid endometriosis: a tissue microarray study. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(1):31–37. Vitagliano A, Noventa M, Quaranta M, Gizzo S. Statins as targeted “magical pills” for the conservative treatment of endome-triosis: may potential adverse effects on female fertility represent the “dark side of the same coin”? A systematic review of literature. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(4):415–428. Rogers P, Adamson G, Al-Jefout M, et al. Research priorities for endometriosis: recommendations from a Global Consortium of Investigators in Endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(2):275–299. Rogers P, D’Hooghe T, Fazleabas A, et al. Priorities for endome-triosis research: recommendations from an international consensus workshop. Reprod Sci. 2009;16(4):335–346. Rogers P, D’Hooghe T, Fazleabas A, et al. Defining future directions for endometriosis research: workshop report from the 2011 World Congress of Endometriosis in Montpellier, France. Reprod Sci. 2013;20(5):483–499. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Maduro, M.R. In the Spotlight. Reprod. Sci. 24, 173 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719116682658 Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719116682658

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (12)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK