Long-term gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy: the evolving issue of steroidal "add-back" paradigms

review OA: bronze public-domain-us
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-09

This review discusses steroid "add-back" paradigms for long-term GnRHa therapy in conditions like endometriosis and fibroids, noting benefits and drawbacks that require further validation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The introduction of steroid "add-back" regimen draws on the recognition that several clinical entities targeted for treatment with GnRHa are not "six-month diseases". Included under this heading are individuals suffering from symptomatic endometriosis (not desirous of pregnancy), uterine fibroids (ineligible or disinterested in definitive surgical therapy), ovarian hyperandrogenism, premenstrual syndrome, menopausal transition, or dysfunctional uterine bleeding. A six month course of therapy with a GnRHa does not adversely affect lipoprotein economy and therefore presumably the corresponding cardiovascular risk. A six month course of GnRHa therapy appears to be associated with a substantial decrease (of up to 8.2%) in lumbar bone density, a phenomenon which may not be entirely reversible six months after discontinuation of therapy. In principle, steroid "add-back" therapy should diminish some or all of the side effects associated with GnRHa therapy, may provide a medical treatment option for patients representing a high surgical risk, and may delay surgical intervention if desired. On the other hand, a steroid "add-back" therapy may delay tissue diagnosis, be associated with a substantial cost as well as with the need in parenteral route of administration. Norethindrone-only (but not medroxyprogesterone acetate-only) "add-back" regimens have proved promising in the context of endometriosis. Non-concurrent estrogen/progestin "add-back" regimens proved promising in the context of uterine fibroids. Substantial additional studies would have to be carried out to validate the utility of steroid "add-back" regimens. Special emphasis will have to be placed on the evaluation of long-term utility with an eye towards assessing clinical efficacy, impact on lipoprotein economy, impact on bone density, impact on urogenital tissues, and impact on the hot flash. The concurrent or non-concurrent use of non-steroid "add-back" regimen will also most likely constitute a major component of future studies.
Full text 2,261 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Long-term Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist Therapy: The Evolving Issue of Steroidal “Add-back” Paradigms 1995 Volume 44 Issue 4 Pages 124-132 Details Abstract The introduction of steroid “add-back” regimen draws on the recognition that several clinical entities targeted for treatment with GnRHa are not “six-month diseases”. Included under this heading are individuals suffering from symptomatic endometriosis (not desirous of pregnancy), uterine fibroids (ineligible or disinterested in definitive surgical therapy), ovarian hyperandrogenism, premenstrual syndrome, menopausal transition, or dysfunctional uterine bleeding. A six month course of therapy with a GnRHa does not adversely affect lipoprotein economy and therefore presumably the corresponding cardiovascular risk. A six month course of GnRHa therapy appears to be associated with a substantial decrease (of up to 8.2%) in lumbar bone density, a phenomenon which may not be entirely reversible six months after discontinuation of therapy. In principle, steroid “add-back” therapy should diminish some or all of the side effects associated with GnRHa therapy, may provide a medical treatment option for patients representing a high surgical risk, and may delay surgical intervention if desired. On the other hand, a steroid “add-back” therapy may delay tissue diagnosis, be associated with a substantial cost as well as with the need in parenteral route of administration. Norethindrone-only (but not medroxyprogesterone acetateonly) “add-back” regimens have proved promising in the context of endometriosis. Non-concurrent estrogen/progestin “add-back” regimens proved promising in the context of uterine fibroids. Substantial additional studies would have to be carried out to validate the utility of steroid “add-back” regimens. Special emphasis will have to be placed on the evaluation of long-term utility with an eye towards assessing clinical efficacy, impact on lipoprotein economy, impact on bone density, impact on urogenital tissues, and impact on the hot flash. The concurrent or non-concurrent use of non-steroid “add-back” regimen will also most likely constitute a major component of future studies. © by The Keio Journal of Medicine Favorites & Alerts Recently viewed articles

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

dysmenorrheaendometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Bone Density Bone Density Breast Neoplasms Breast Neoplasms Climacteric Climacteric Dysmenorrhea Dysmenorrhea Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Humans Hyperandrogenism Hyperandrogenism Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Osteoporosis Osteoporosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-15T06:15:18.721777+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:08.331550+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine