Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients affected by endometriosis: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional online survey

In: Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders · 2025 · vol. 17(2) , pp. 80–92 · doi:10.1177/22840265251314992 · W4407182784
article OA: hybrid CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

A cross-sectional survey of endometriosis patients found that COVID-19 pandemic disruptions in healthcare services exacerbated symptoms, increased pain, and heightened psychological distress.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially impacted the management of chronic conditions, particularly endometriosis. This study aims to analyze the effects of the pandemic on the quality of life among women with endometriosis under the care of an academic referral center in Italy. Methods: Conducted from June to October 2020, this observational study utilized an online survey to assess various health dimensions. The participants included women with a confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis whose clinic appointments were cancelled, and new ones were difficult to schedule due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. The online questionnaire comprised 117 questions designed to evaluate chronic pelvic pain, quality of life, and psychological impacts using validated scales such as SF-12, HADS, EHP-5, and PSQI. Results: A total of 105 participants completed the online questionnaire. It was found that pandemic-related disruptions in healthcare services exacerbated symptoms of endometriosis, increased pain levels, and heightened psychological distress among participants. Specifically, 23.8% of patients reported increased pain due to delays in medical consultations and treatments caused by the pandemic. Results indicated significant correlations between higher levels of anxiety, depression, and deteriorated physical and mental health. The analysis revealed that pandemic-related stress and disruptions in routine care were significant predictors of worsened symptoms and overall health status in patients with endometriosis. Conclusion: The study underscores the need for integrated care approaches that address both the physical and psychosocial aspects of endometriosis, especially during healthcare crises. Enhanced support and resources are essential to mitigate the impact of such disruptions on chronic disease management and improve the quality of life for those affected.
Full text 11,730 characters · extracted from oa-html · 8 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Introduction:

Methods

Results:

Conclusion

Introduction

Materials and methods

Recruitment Data collection and assessment Data analysis Statistical analysis

Results

| Patient characteristics | n = 105 | | Age (years): mean ± SD | 37.36 ± 8.17 | | Employment status (working) n (%) | 61 (58.7) | | Educational level: n (%) | | | Lower secondary education High school diploma Postgraduate degree University degree | 22 (21.2%) 46 (44.2%) 7 (6.7%) 29 (27.9%) | | Marital status (living with partner/married) n (%) | 62 (59.6%) | | Current weight (kg): mean ± SD | 61.02 ± 13.00 | | Height (cm): mean ± SD | 161.83 ± 6.65 | | Smoking status: n (%) | | | Non-smoker Smokes traditional cigarettes Uses electronic cigarette | 86 (81.9%) 16 (15.2%) 3 (2.9%) | | Pain and menstruation | | | Age at first menstruation (years): mean ± SD | 12.02 ± 1.45 | | Menstruation (currently painful): no = n (%) | 48 (45.7%) | | Menstruation (always been painful): yes = n (%) | 82 (78.1%) | | Duration of painful menstruation if not always (years): mean ± SD | 7.38 ± 5.16 | | Use of analgesics for menstrual pain: no = n (%) | 38 (36.2%) | | Use of analgesics for chronic pelvic pain: no = n (%) | 58 (55.2%) | | Number of analgesics for chronic pelvic pain during the month: mean ± SD | 5.92 ± 7.25 | | Use of GnRH analog hormonal therapy: no = n (%) | 61 (58.1%) | | Duration of pharmacological menopause (months): mean ± SD | 25.25 ± 25.43 | | Use of contraceptive Pill hormonal therapy: yes = n (%) | 65 (61.9%) | | Duration of taking the pill (months): mean ± SD | 76.90 ± 105.87 | | Method of hormonal therapy (monthly pause): yes = n (%) | 3 (4.6%) | | Menstruation regularity without contraceptive Pill: Regular = n (%) | 16 (64.0%) | | Endometriosis and surgeries | | | Undergone surgeries for endometriosis: yes = n (%) | 51 (48.6%) | | Number of surgeries undergone: mean ± SD | 1.96 ± 2.95 | | Year of first surgery: mean ± SD | 2010.12 ± 6.81 | | Year of second surgery: mean ± SD | 2011.21 ± 6.07 | | Undergone intestinal derivation/resection during surgery: yes = n (%) | 5 (10.9%) | | Undergone removal of a fallopian tube and ovary during surgery: yes = n (%) | 4 (8.5%) | | Undergone removal of both fallopian tubes and ovaries during surgery: yes = n (%) | 2 (4.3%) | | Undergone other procedures during surgery: no = n (%) | 19 (44.2%) | | Other pathologies beyond endometriosis: yes = n (%) | 55 (52.4%) | | Undergone surgeries for other pathologies beyond endometriosis in the last year: yes = n (%) | 8 (7.7%) | | Duration since endometriosis diagnosis (years): mean ± SD | 8.72 ± 9.47 | | Type of endometriosis diagnosed: n (%) | | | Ovarian Superficial Deep | 50 (48.1%) 11 (10.6%) 43 (41.3%) | | Fertility and pregnancy | | | Previous pregnancies: yes = n (%) | 38 (36.5%) | | Number of pregnancies: mean ± SD | 1.47 ± 0.73 | | Abortions: yes = n (%) | 26 (25.0%) | | Number of abortions: mean ± SD | 1.23 ± 0.51 | | Voluntary pregnancy interruptions (IVG): yes = n (%) | 7 (6.7%) | | Number of IVG: mean ± SD | 1.00 ± 0.00 | | Currently seeking pregnancy: yes = n (%) | 7 (6.7%) | | Duration of seeking pregnancy (months): mean ± SD | 98.00 ± 84.31 | | Resorted to assisted reproduction techniques: yes = n (%) | 6 (5.8%) | | Techniques used in assisted reproduction: n (%) | | | IUI (Intrauterine insemination) IVF (in vitro fertilization) ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) | 5 (27.8%) 4 (23.5%) 3 (16.7%) | | Symptoms and pain assessment in the last month | | | Dysmenorrhea (mean ± SD) | 3.93 ± 3.81 | | Chronic pelvic pain outside of menstruation: (mean ± SD) | 3.64 (3.32) | | Sexual intercourse: yes = n (%) | 71 (67.6%) | | Dyspareunia (mean ± SD) | 4.52 (3.09) | | Rectal pain: no = n (%) | 48 (45.7%) | | Rectal pain (mean ± SD) | 4.94 ± 3.39 | | Rectal tenesmus: no = n (%) | 62 (59.0%) | | Rectal dyschezia: no = n (%) | 44 (41.9%) | | Changes in bowel habits during menstruation: yes = n (%) | 49 (46.7%) | | Changes in bowel habits apart from menstruation: yes = n (%) | 52 (49.5%) | | Dysuria: no = n (%) | 73 (69.5%) | | Dysuria (mean ± SD) | 3.62 ± 3.67 | | Vescical tenesmus: no = n (%) | 42 (40.0%) | | Pollakiuria: no = n (%) | 53 (50.5%) | | Treatment and health care access | | | Waitlisted for surgery, n (%) | 6 (5.7) | | Needed to visit doctors for endometriosis: no = n (%) | 69 (65.7) | | Difficulty contacting doctors: yes = n (%) | 25 (23.8) | | Felt medical abandonment (mean ± SD) | 3.48 ± 3.27 | | Changes in pain due to COVID-19 health emergency n (%) | | | Decreased from the previous period Unchanged from the previous period Increased from the previous period | 25 (23.8) 64 (61.0) 16 (15.2) | | Increased pain average (mean ± SD) | 7.44 ± 1.89 | | Concerns and worries | | | Concerned about planning pregnancy (mean ± SD) | 3.45 ± 4.44 | | Concerned about economic factors (mean ± SD) | 6.50 ± 3.26 | | Concerned about personal/family factors (mean ± SD) | 6.99 ± 2.81 | | Concerned about pandemic factors (mean ± SD) | 6.30 ± 2.89 | | Concerned about being infected (mean ± SD) | 5.72 ± 3.20 | | Concerned about infecting the family (mean ± SD) | 7.08 ± 3.33 | | Concerned about family health (mean ± SD) | 8.33 ± 2.48 | | Concerned about difficulty to contact doctors (mean ± SD) | 5.13 ± 3.18 | | Concerned about about clinic closures (mean ± SD) | 6.01 ± 2.98 | | Concerned about waiting lists for new appointment (mean ± SD) | 6.79 ± 3.08 | | Concerned about starting new therapies for endometriosis (mean ± SD) | 5.45 ± 3.57 | | Scale | Mean ± SD | Median | Range | |---|---|---|---| | SF12 physical component summary (PCS12) | 41.4 ± 11.1 | 41.3 | 18.5–66.8 | | SF12 mental component summary (MCS12) | 39.3 ± 11.2 | 38.7 | 12.8–65.1 | | Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) anxiety | 10.5 ± 4.4 | 10 | 0–20 | | HADS depression | 9.4 ± 3.5 | 9 | 2–21 | | HADS total | 19.9 ± 7.2 | 20 | 2–39 | | Endometriosis health profile-5 (EHP5) | 49.2 ± 19.5 | 48.8 | 0–91.2 | | Subjective sleep quality | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 1 | 0–3 | | Sleep latency | 1.4 ± 1.0 | 1 | 0–3 | | Sleep duration | 1.4 ± 1.0 | 2 | 0–3 | | Habitual sleep efficiency | 0.9 ± 1.1 | 0 | 0–3 | | Sleep disturbances | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 2 | 0–3 | | Use of sleeping medication | 0.6 ± 1.1 | 0 | 0–3 | | Sleep dysfunction | 0.3 ± 0.5 | 0 | 0–2 | | Global pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) score | 7.8 ± 4.4 | 7 | 1–17 | | Variable 1 | Variable 2 | Spearman’s Rho | Significance | |---|---|---|---| | SF12 MCS | SF12 PCS12 | −0.018 | p = 0.859 | | HADS anxiety | SF12 PCS12 | −0.382 | p<0.001 | | SF12 MCS12 | −0.510 | p<0.001 | | | HADS depression | SF12 PCS12 | −0.287 | p = 0.003 | | SF12 MCS12 | −0.673 | p<0.001 | | | HADS Anxiety | 0.653 | p<0.001 | | | HADS total | SF12 PCS12 | −0.366 | p<0.001 | | SF12 MCS12 | −0.641 | p<0.001 | | | Subjective sleep quality | SF12 PCS12 | −0.284 | p = 0.003 | | SF12 MCS12 | −0.337 | p<0.001 | | | Sleep latency | SF12 PCS12 | −0.226 | p = 0.020 | | SF12 MCS12 | −0.238 | p = 0.014 | | | Sleep duration | SF12 PCS12 | −0.230 | p = 0.019 | | SF12 MCS12 | −0.252 | p = 0.010 | | | Habitual sleep efficiency | SF12 PCS12 | −0.405 | p<0.001 | | SF12 MCS12 | −0.244 | p = 0.013 | | | Sleep disturbance | SF12 PCS12 | −0.394 | p<0.001 | | SF12 MCS12 | −0.271 | p = 0.005 | | | Sleep dysfunction | SF12 PCS12 | −0.222 | p = 0.023 | | SF12 MCS12 | −0.276 | p = 0.004 | | | Global PSQI score | SF12 PCS12 | −0.407 | p<0.001 | | SF12 MCS12 | −0.345 | p<0.001 | | | EHP5 media standard | SF12 PCS12 | −0.591 | p<0.001 | | SF12 MCS12 | -0.321 | p<0.001 | | Cluster | Pain increased during COVID pandemic | Pain unchanged during COVID pandemic | Pain decreased during COVID pandemic | Rectal pain during the last month | Needed medical assistance during COVID pandemic | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Cluster 1 Observed (n) | 5 | 37 | 12 | 21 | 9 | | Expected (n) | 12.9 | 32.9 | 8.23 | 29.3 | 18.5 | | % within row | 9.3 % | 68.5 % | 22.2 % | 38.9 % | 16.7 % | | Cluster 2 Observed (n) | 20 | 27 | 4 | 36 | 27 | | Expected (n) | 12.1 | 31.1 | 7.77 | 27.7 | 17.5 | | % within row | 39.2 % | 52.9 % | 7.8 % | 70.6 % | 52.9 % | | Health scale | Mean (SD) | Median | Min | Max | Comparison with normative data | Comparison with clinical data | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | SF12 PCS12 | 41.4 (11.1) | 41.3 | 18.5 | 66.8 | Facchini et al.47 H0 population mean ≠ 53.4 Student’s t = −11.1; df = 104; p<0.001 Cohen’s d = −1.08 | Vannucini et al.48 H0 population mean ≠ 41.5 Student’s t = −0.0834; df = 104; p = 0.934; Cohen’s d = 0.00814 | | SF12 MCS12 | 39.3 (11.2) | 38.7 | 12.8 | 65.1 | Facchini et al. 47 H0 population mean ≠ 43.4 Student’s t = −3.76; df = 104; p<0.001 Cohen’s d = −0.367 | Vannucini et al.48 H0 population mean ≠ 37. Student’s t = 1.94; df = 104; p = 0.055; Cohen’s d = 0.189 | | HADS anxiety | 10.5 (4.4) | 10 | 0 | 20 | Facchini et al.47 H0 population mean ≠ 6.49 Student’s t = 9.31 df = 104 p<0.001 Cohen’s d = 0.908 | Facchin et al.49 H0 population mean ≠ 7.5 Student’s t = 6.94; df = 104; p<0.001; Cohen’s d = 0.677 | | HADS depression | 9.4 (3.5) | 9 | 2 | 21 | Facchini et al.47 H0 population mean ≠ 4.71 Student’s t = 13.9; df = 104; p<0.001; Cohen’s d = 1.36 | Facchin et al.49 H0 population mean ≠ 6.1 Student’s t = 9.83; df = 104; p<0.001; Cohen’s d = 0.959 | | EHP-5 | 49.2 (19.5) | 48.8 | 0 | 91.2 | NA | Aubry et al.54 H0 population mean ≠ 48.1 Student’s t = 0.604; df = 104; p = 0.547; Cohen’s d = 0.0589 | | Global PSQI score | 7.8 (4.4) | 7 | 1 | 17 | NA | NA | | Proportion of patients with sleep problems (PSQ > 5) | 67% (70/105) | Leone Roberti Maggiore et al.53 H0 population proportion of women with sleep problems (Global PSQI score >5) ≠ 0.648 p = 0.759 |

Discussion

Conclusion Declaration of conflicting interests Funding ORCID iDs Data availability statement

References

Supplementary Material Please find the following supplemental material available below. For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with. For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article. Cite Cite Cite Download to reference manager If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice Information, rights and permissions Information Published In

Keywords

Data availability statement Article versions Authors Metrics and citations Metrics Journals metrics This article was published in Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders. View All Journal MetricsPublication usage* Total views and downloads: 581 *Publication usage tracking started in December 2016 Publications citing this one Receive email alerts when this publication is cited Web of Science: 3 view articles Opens in new tab Crossref: 2 - Patient experience surveys for endometriosis care: A scoping review - Long COVID and endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Figures and tables Figures & Media Tables View Options View options PDF/EPUB View PDF/EPUBAccess options If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below: loading institutional access options Alternatively, view purchase options below: Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content. Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

EHP-30

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (55)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK