Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy bleeding or pain associated with intrauterine-device use
review
OA: green
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This review of randomized controlled trials found that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs effectively reduced bleeding and pain associated with intrauterine device use, but prophylactic use yielded mixed results.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heavy bleeding and pain are the most common reasons why women discontinue IUDs. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which inhibit prostaglandin synthesis, have been shown to be effective in reducing menstrual bleeding and pain in women without IUDs. OBJECTIVES: This review summarizes all randomized controlled trials studying use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment of bleeding or pain associated with IUD use. Trials of prophylactic use of these drugs around the time of IUD insertion were also included. SEARCH STRATEGY: We performed searches of PubMed, CENTRAL, POPLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and CINAHL for relevant trials. We also wrote to the authors of all trials identified to seek other published or unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials in any language that tested one or more nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment or prevention of bleeding or pain associated with IUD insertion or use. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently abstracted data from relevant trials, and we entered data into RevMan for analysis. MAIN RESULTS: We found 15 trials from 10 countries; the total number of participants was 2702. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (naproxen, suprofen, mefenamic acid, ibuprofen, indomethacin, flufenamic acid, alclofenac, and diclofenac) were effective in reducing menstrual blood loss associated with IUD use. This held true for women with and without complaints of heavy bleeding. Similarly, these drugs were effective in reducing pain associated with IUD use. In contrast, prophylactic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs had mixed results; studies with ibuprofen found no effect on pain after insertion on IUD discontinuation. No important differences emerged in the one trial comparing the effect of different NSAIDs on bleeding. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce bleeding and pain associated with IUD use. NSAIDs should be considered first-line therapy; if NSAIDs are ineffective, tranexamic acid may be considered as second-line therapy. Prophylactic ibuprofen administration with the first six menses after insertion appears unwarranted.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (4)
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding 1998
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding 2007
- Therapeutic Use of the LNG IUS, and Counseling 2001
- Prostaglandin Synthesis Inhibitors in Menorrhagia, Intrauterine Contraceptive Device‐Induced Side Effects and Endometriosis 1994
Cited by (2)
References (57)
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding via openalex
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding via openalex
- Prostaglandin Synthesis Inhibitors in Menorrhagia, Intrauterine Contraceptive Device‐Induced Side Effects and Endometriosis via openalex
- Therapeutic Use of the LNG IUS, and Counseling via openalex
- doi:10.1080/00365516409060511 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1978.tb15826.x via openalex
- W100781816 via openalex
- W174748644 via openalex
- W320820161 via openalex
- W654457677 via openalex
- W905772517 via openalex
- W1437850079 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0010-7824(74)90133-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.140 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb06751.x via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002126.pub3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(78)91864-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00393-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010628.pub2 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16249.x via openalex
- doi:10.1007/bf02887897 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(64)90397-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0020-7292(83)90067-x via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/del029 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/j.1879-3479.1980.tb00298.x via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13225.x via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7188.927 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(79)90844-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007373.pub2 via openalex
- W2147783658 via openalex
- W2253945284 via openalex
- W2373072560 via openalex
- W2397919070 via openalex
- W2399463427 via openalex
- W2401767056 via openalex
- W2406115823 via openalex
- W2409157570 via openalex
- W2413017230 via openalex
- W2415214381 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0010-7824(78)90071-9 via openalex
- W2443109627 via openalex
- W2463729406 via openalex
- W6607039793 via openalex
- W6628320755 via openalex
- W6629664411 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002126 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00019616-199311000-00013 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07910.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(79)90712-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00186-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0010-7824(95)00163-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(76)90216-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001751 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/deg449 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/00365516409060511 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006254-198107000-00018 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007373.pub3 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T10:50:03.661949+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK