CLINICAL ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: Haemodynamic Evaluation of Tubal and Male Factors of Infertility in Natural and Ovarian Stimulation Cycles
This study found measurable uterine artery blood flow differences between tubal and male infertility in natural cycles, which were abolished after ovarian stimulation.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This prospective study evaluated pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) of the uterine and ovarian arteries in women with tubal-factor versus male-factor infertility, comparing natural cycles with ovarian-stimulated cycles. In natural cycles, uterine PI and RI differed between groups, with tubal infertility showing lower uterine PI (3.55 ± 1.39) and similar but distinct uterine RI (0.95 ± 0.05) compared with male-factor infertility. After ovarian stimulation in tubal factor, uterine PI and RI values became similar to those in male-factor infertility, indicating that stimulation abolished the natural-cycle differences. The paper’s limitation is that it focuses on haemodynamic indices rather than direct implantation or pregnancy outcomes, as described in the abstract. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
4,237 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
References (18)
- Human endometrial perfusion after tubal occlusion via openalex
- Midluteal-phase vaginal color Doppler assessment of uterine artery impedance in a subfertile population via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57065-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006254-199206000-00024 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136772 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54848-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58400-3 via openalex
- W194557276 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/875647939501100131 via openalex
- doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1993.03050350.x via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/11.2.364 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0020-7292(94)90479-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/10.6.1497 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)42917-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136148 via openalex
- doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05060406.x via openalex
- doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-1987-6_1 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00003081-198012000-00023 via openalex
SciLite annotations
organisms 1
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:12:37.668444+00:00
- scilite
- last seen: 2026-05-18T04:57:49.680383+00:00