Safety and efficacy of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blocks for treatment of pelvic pain
article
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks provided pain relief for 79% of patients with lower abdominal wall pelvic pain, with only 5% reporting minor adverse events.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for patients with lower abdominal wall pain in a gynaecology setting. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 131 patients who received ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks at a tertiary referral centre for pelvic pain between 1 January 2012 and 13 July 2017 was performed. Patient demographics, history, examination findings and block data were extracted. Chi-square and Mann–Whitney U tests explored differences in patient characteristics between patients with and without effective response to their initial ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block. Results: A total of 465 ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks were performed among patients. The effect of the initial block was available for 99 out of 131 patients. Of these patients, 70% (n = 69) reported a great improvement in pain, 9% (n = 9) some improvement in pain, 18% (n = 18) no response and 3% (n = 3) worsening of pain. A significantly greater number of patients who were not responsive to their first block reported unilateral pain (p = 0.040) and had a history of vulvodynia (p = 0.038) when compared to patients who were responsive to their first block. Seven patients (5%) reported minor adverse events related to blocks. Conclusion: Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks provide pain relief for those with pelvic pain localized to the lower abdominal wall, with a low rate of minor adverse events.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (30)
- A profile of women with chronic pelvic pain. via openalex
- A Profile of Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain via openalex
- Chronic Pelvic Pain via openalex
- Chronic pelvic pain in women via openalex
- Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: An Epidemiological Perspective via openalex
- Nongynecologic somatic pathology in women with chronic pelvic pain and negative laparoscopy. via openalex
- Occult Somatic Pathology in Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain via openalex
- Relating Chronic Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis to Signs of Sensitization and Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction via openalex
- The abdominal wall: an overlooked source of pain. via openalex
- W2061082565 via openalex
- W2066166555 via openalex
- W2074915949 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00003081-199806000-00023 via openalex
- W2106545664 via openalex
- W2148694444 via openalex
- W2157783203 via openalex
- W2168532965 via openalex
- W2291126069 via openalex
- W2507397501 via openalex
- W2547963052 via openalex
- W4249078312 via openalex
- W2083899651 via openalex
- W1516977575 via openalex
- W1858358021 via openalex
- W1963640566 via openalex
- W1985591211 via openalex
- W1988433487 via openalex
- W2012909298 via openalex
- W2039157853 via openalex
- W2051400077 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK