A randomized, prospective, controlled study of laparoscopic dye studies and selective salpingography as diagnostic tests of fallopian tube patency

Robert Woolcott, Woolcott R, R Woolcott, S Fisher, Fisher S, Sonya Fisher, Jane Thomas, Thomas J, J Thomas, W Kable, Wendy Kable, Kable W
Fertility and Sterility · 1999 · vol. 72(5) , pp. 879–884 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00382-9 · PMID:10560993 · W1963978058
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 13 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This study compared laparoscopic dye studies and selective salpingography for diagnosing fallopian tube patency in a randomized, prospective, controlled manner.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine and compare the relative merits of laparoscopic dye (LD) studies and selective salpingography (SS) as diagnostic tests of fallopian tube patency.DesignRandomized, prospective, controlled study.SettingUniversity-associated assisted reproduction unit.Patient(s)Two hundred seventy-eight women undergoing investigation of infertility.Intervention(s)Allocation to the performance of either LD studies followed by SS or SS followed by LD studies conducted sequentially under general anesthesia.Main outcome measure(s)Detection of fallopian tube occlusion, including the site of obstruction and evidence of peritubal or pelvic disease.Result(s)When diagnosis was compared by the first test used, 16 (11.9%) of 135 patients had proximal tubal occlusion at LD studies versus 5 (3.6%) of 138 at SS. Twelve (5.6%) of 122 patients had distal tubal occlusion at LD studies versus 14 (10.5%) of 133 at SS. Fifteen (11.1%) of 135 patients had peritubal disease at LD studies versus 3 (2.52%) of 119 at SS. When diagnosis was compared by individual tubes, the results were similar. Among patients who had proximal occlusion and otherwise normal tubes by both methods, endometriosis was present in 72.2%.Conclusion(s)Selective salpingography is a better diagnostic test of proximal tubal occlusion than are LD studies. There is no difference between SS and LD studies as a diagnostic test of distal tubal occlusion. Laparoscopic dye studies are a better diagnostic test for assessing peritubal disease than is SS. There may be an association between endometriosis and proximal tubal occlusion. Selective salpingography and LD studies are complementary investigations of the fallopian tubes.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Fallopian Tube Patency Tests Hysterosalpingography Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Adult Coloring Agents Female Humans Infertility, Female Prospective Studies

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (16)

Cited by (13)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-29T06:27:48.050232+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:24.024533+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK