EARLY DETECTION OF ENDOMETRIOSIS – A LITERATURE REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC METHODS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Early diagnosis remains essential for improving patient outcomes and limiting disease progression. However, the disease is often diagnosed too late, which remains a major clinical challenge. Recent evidence supports imaging-based diagnostic strategies as the foundation of diagnosis, whereas biomarker-based approaches require further development. Future advances in AI and integrated diagnostic models may contribute to more accurate and timely detection of endometriosis.

Chu, L.-L., Wu, M., Yang, W.-L., Cong, L.-H., & Li, L. (2025). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings of peritoneal polypoid endometriosis: A case report and literature review. International Journal of Women's Health, 1557–1562. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S510066 Brosens, I., Gordts, S., & Benagiano, G. (2013). Endometriosis in adolescents is a hidden, progressive and severe disease that deserves attention, not just compassion. Human Reproduction, 28(8), 2026–2031. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det243 World Health Organization. (2025). Endometriosis. Chauhan, S., More, A., Chauhan, V., & Kathane, A. (2022). Endometriosis: A review of clinical diagnosis, treatment, and pathogenesis. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28864 Barra, F., Scala, C., Leone Roberti Maggiore, U., Evangelisti, G., Alessandri, F., Vellone, V. G., Stabilini, C., & Ferrero, S. (2021). A prospective study comparing rectal water contrast-transvaginal ultrasonography with sonovaginography for the diagnosis of deep posterior endometriosis. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14209 Guerriero, S., Ajossa, S., Orozco, R., Perniciano, M., Jurado, M., Melis, G. B., & Alcazar, J. L. (2016). Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis in the rectosigmoid: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol., 47, 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15662 Brulport, A., Bourdon, M., Vaiman, D., Drouet, C., Pocate-Cheriet, K., Bouzid, K., Marcellin, L., Santulli, P., Abo, C., Jeljeli, M., Chouzenoux, S., Chapron, C., Batteux, F., Berthelot, C., & Doridot, L. (2024). An integrated multi-tissue approach for endometriosis candidate biomarkers: A systematic review. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 22, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958 Fryer, J., Mason-Jones, A. J., & Woodward, A. (2024). Understanding diagnostic delay for endometriosis: A scoping review using the social-ecological framework. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2024.2413056 Li, W., Feng, H., & Ye, Q. (2025). Factors contributing to the delayed diagnosis of endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Med., 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1576490 Harzif, A. K., Nurbaeti, P., & Wiweko, B. (2024). Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of endometriosis: A systematic review. https://doi.org/10.1177/22840265241291120 Wróbel, M., Wielgoś, M., & Laudański, P. (2022). Diagnostic delay of endometriosis in adults and adolescence-current stage of knowledge. Advances in Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advms.2022.02.003 Kozik, E. (2025). “Invisible” pain – social exclusion of patients with endometriosis: A qualitative analysis. https://doi.org/10.14746/kse.2025.27.1.16 Jiao, H., Feng, W., & Liu, H. (2026). Clinical diagnosis and treatment of bowel endometriosis and the distribution characteristics of lesions. BMC Women's Health, 26, 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-04248-3 Guerriero, S., Ajossa, S., Pagliuca, M., Borzacchelli, A., Springer, S., Pilloni, M., Taccori, V., Pascual, M. A., Deiala, F., Graupera, B., & Alcazar, J. L. (2022). Advances in imaging for assessing pelvic endometriosis. Diagnostics, 12, 2960. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12122960 Bausic, A., Coroleucă, C., Coroleucă, C., Manu, A., Frîncu, F., Comandasu, D., Matasariu, R., Mehedint, C., & Brătilă, E. (2022). Transvaginal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) value in endometriosis diagnosis. Diagnostics, 12, 1767. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071767 Zheng, Z., et al. (2023). Qualitative and quantitative features of deep endometriosis in contrast-enhanced ultrasound: An initial experience and literature review. https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-231843 Alonzo, L., et al. (2024). Magnetic resonance imaging of endometriosis: The role of advanced techniques. J. Clin. Med., 13(19), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195783 NICE. (2024). Endometriosis: Diagnosis and management [Guideline]. Arezzo, F., et al. (2022). The application of sonovaginography for implementing ultrasound assessment of endometriosis and other gynaecological diseases. Diagnostics, 12(4), 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040820 Daniilidis, A., Grigoriadis, G., Dalakoura, D., D’Alterio, M. N., Angioni, S., & Roman, H. (2022). Transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis and assessment of endometriosis—An overview: How, why, and when. Diagnostics, 12, 2912. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12122912 Arian, A., Karimi, N., Ahmadinejad, N., Azadnajafabad, S., & Delazar, S. (2025). Refining MRI protocols for endometriosis: A comparative study of abbreviated and full MRI sequences. British Journal of Radiology, 98(1166), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae230 Alcazar, J. L., et al. (2022). Diagnostic accuracy of sliding sign for detecting pouch of Douglas obliteration and bowel involvement in women with suspected endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.24900 Sivajohan, B., Elgendi, M., Menon, C., et al. (2022). Clinical use of artificial intelligence in endometriosis: A scoping review. npj Digit. Med., 5, 109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00638-1 Zhang, X., et al. (2020). Comparison of physical examination, ultrasound techniques and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9043 Luz, K. P., et al. (2025). Empowering women through intelligent care: A narrative review of AI-driven digital innovations for endometriosis diagnosis, education, and equity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44326-025-00061-2 Kliber-Gałuszka, M., Kulczyńska-Figurny, K., Jagodziński, P. P., & Pławski, A. (2025). Potential biomarkers for early detection of endometriosis: Current state of art (what we know so far). Journal of Applied Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-025-01021-y Avery, J. C., et al. (n.d.). Noninvasive diagnostic imaging for endometriosis part 1: A systematic review of recent developments in ultrasound, combination imaging, and artificial intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.008 Goncalves, M. O., et al. (2021). Systematic evaluation of endometriosis by transvaginal ultrasound can accurately replace diagnostic laparoscopy, mainly for deep and ovarian endometriosis. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab085 Rogalska, A., et al. (2025). Diagnostic tools for endometriosis in Poland: A comparative assessment of reliability and out-of-pocket costs. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144935 Becker, C. M., et al. (2022). ESHRE guideline: Endometriosis. Xholli, A., et al. (2024). The benefit of transvaginal elastography in detecting deep endometriosis: A feasibility study. Ultraschall Med, 45(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2028-8214 Brunelli, A. C., Brito, L. G. O., Moro, F. A. S., Jales, R. M., Yela, D. A., & Benetti-Pinto, C. L. (2023). Ultrasound elastography for the diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis. 49(3), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.11.006 Downloads Published Issue Section License Copyright (c) 2026 Izabela Harpula, Natalia Bębenek, Benedykt Baljon, Justyna Bogdan, Radosław Ramotowski , Patryk Brzezicki, Paulina Frączkiewicz , Gabriela Barszcz , Monika Błądek, Karolina Karolina, Sylwia Wit This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles. CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.