Empowering women through intelligent care: a narrative review of AI-driven digital innovations for endometriosis diagnosis, education, and equity

In: Journal of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology · 2025 · vol. 12(1) · doi:10.1007/s44326-025-00061-2 · W4411874160
review OA: hybrid CC0
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This review examines AI-driven digital innovations for endometriosis, finding promising diagnostic and educational tools but noting persistent technical, ethical, and sociocultural barriers to clinical integration and equity.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This narrative review examines AI-driven digital innovations for endometriosis diagnosis, education, and management by synthesizing peer-reviewed literature and technical reports, including work on symptom tracking, imaging analysis, decision support, and related ethical and regulatory guidance. The authors report promising developments but emphasize persistent barriers to clinical integration, including small or biased datasets, heterogeneous diagnostic criteria and outcomes, limited longitudinal data, workflow misalignment, limited explainability, scarce prospective validation, privacy risks, algorithmic bias, and sociocultural issues such as the digital divide, health literacy gaps, and stigma. A key limitation explicitly discussed is that most FemTech solutions and AI efforts show limited readiness for endometriosis’s complex and heterogeneous needs, with many lacking real-world data integration and participatory, transparent design frameworks. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically reviews AI applications and the barriers and ethical framework for digital health innovations in endometriosis care.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Background Endometriosis is a chronic, inflammatory, and multifactorial gynecological disorder affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age worldwide. It is associated with debilitating pelvic pain, infertility, and significant socioeconomic burden. Despite its impact, diagnosis is often delayed due to nonspecific symptoms and the absence of non-invasive biomarkers. Objective This narrative review critically examines the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in endometriosis diagnosis, education, and management, identifies existing barriers to clinical integration, and proposes a strategic framework for the development of inclusive and ethical digital health ecosystems. Methods A narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed literature and technical reports was conducted, focusing on AI-enabled tools in reproductive health, endometriosis-specific applications, ethical guidelines for AI in healthcare, and regulatory frameworks. Comparative analysis of current FemTech solutions was also included. Results Despite promising developments in AI-based symptom-tracking, imaging analysis, and decision support, significant barriers persist. These include technical limitations (small and biased datasets), clinical misalignment, ethical concerns (privacy risks, bias amplification), and sociocultural challenges (digital divide, stigma). Current FemTech platforms demonstrate limited readiness to address the complex needs of endometriosis patients. Conclusions To fully realize AI’s transformative potential in endometriosis care, future efforts must prioritize participatory design, real-world data integration, transparency, inclusivity, and regulatory compliance. Endometriosis must be elevated within digital health equity agendas to ensure that technological innovations effectively address the lived experiences of women affected by this condition.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

References (10)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK