Effect of inseminated volume on intrauterine insemination.
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This study compared 0.5 mL versus 3.0 mL inseminated semen volumes during intrauterine insemination, finding no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between the two techniques for treating infertility.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
PurposeIntrauterine insemination (IUI) is a method for the treatment of marital infertility involving the intrauterine or fallopian deposition of washed spermatozoa, depending on the amount of inseminated semen. In view of the divergent opinions about the inseminated volume, the objective of this study was to compare the two techniques (3.0 mL or 0.5 mL) in two groups of patients.MethodsWe performed 164 cycles of ovulation induction followed by IUI. The patients were divided into two groups according to the technique used. Group low volume--50 cycles and 0.5 mL of inseminated semen; Group high volume--114 cycles and 3.0 mL of inseminated semen. The cycle was monitored on the basis of endometrial thickness and follicular development measured by transvaginal ultrasound. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) was administered in the presence of a follicle measuring 18 mm in mean diameter. The procedure was performed after sperm washing using a discontinuous PureSperm gradient, 40 h later.ResultsWe obtained a similar clinical pregnancy rate for the two groups (14.0% for Group low volume and 15.7% for Group high volume). There was one abortion in each group. We detected no interference by any etiology of infertility or by the total motile recovered sperm with pregnancy rate.ConclusionsThe results did not demonstrate superiority of one method over the other, with both therapeutic alternatives being satisfactory for the treatment of infertile couples.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-06T09:34:12.023084+00:00