Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations and Classification of Adenomyosis

In: Adenomyosis · 2021 · pp. 79–87 · doi:10.1007/978-981-33-4095-4_9 · W3130412718
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-13

This chapter details magnetic resonance imaging's (MRI) role in diagnosing, classifying, and monitoring adenomyosis by describing its basic manifestations, subtypes, and relevant technologies.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This paper/chapter reviews how magnetic resonance imaging is used to diagnose, subtype (type/“typing”), and monitor treatment response in uterine adenomyosis, focusing on basic MRI manifestations and the features of each adenomyosis subtype, alongside relevant MRI technologies and emerging directions. It emphasizes MRI advantages such as clear imaging, operator-independent characteristics, and multi-parameter, multi-planar techniques, and notes increasing clinical adoption alongside wider MRI availability and lower scanning costs. A major caveat is that the piece is descriptive/educational rather than presenting new primary study results, and it does not provide explicit comparative accuracy estimates within the chapter text provided. Relevance to endometriosis: it explicitly cites prior work examining the relationship between MRI appearances of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes, though its main focus is adenomyosis MRI manifestations and classification. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — it summarizes MRI manifestations and classification of adenomyosis subtypes.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 4,341 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the important imaging methods for the female reproductive system. In recent years, its application in the management of adenomyosis has been increasingly recognized by clinical physicians. MRI has been mainly applied to the diagnosis, typing, and monitoring after treatment of uterine adenomyosis due to its many advantages, such as clear and intuitive images, operator-independent features, and multi-parameter and multi-planar techniques. Since imaging diagnosis is now essential for a comprehensive diagnosis of adenomyosis, MRI has been increasingly applied to make a diagnosis, typing, and monitoring the treatment result of adenomyosis. The gradual popularization of MRI equipment, the decline in scanning costs, and the rapid development of its software and hardware have also increased its application. This chapter mainly describes the basic MRI manifestations, classification, and findings of each subtype of adenomyosis and introduces the relevant MRI technology and application frontiers. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Togashi K, et al. Adenomyosis: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;166(1):111–4. Tamai K, et al. MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics. 2005;25(1):21–40. Bazot M, Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):389–97. Kishi Y, et al. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(2):114–e1-114. e7. Bazot M, et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2427–33. Novellas S, et al. MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(5):1206–13. Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG. Uterine junctional zone: function and disease. Lancet. 1995;346(8974):558–60. Bazot M, et al. Fast breath-hold T2-weighted MR imaging reduces interobserver variability in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(5):1291–6. Chapron C, et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(7):1393–401. Song SE, et al. MR imaging features of uterine adenomyomas. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36(4):483–8. Troiano RN, Flynn SD, McCarthy S. Cystic adenomyosis of the uterus: MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;8(6):1198–202. Kido A, Togashi K. Uterine anatomy and function on cine magnetic resonance imaging. Reproductive medicine and biology. 2016;15(4):191–9. Qu Yalin LF, Zhibo X, Fajin L, Hui X, Jia L, Feifei Z. Cine MRI study of uterine peristalsis in patients with fibroids and menorrhagia. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;7(7):506–11. Ghosh A, et al. T2 relaxometry mapping in demonstrating layered uterine architecture: parameter optimization and utility in endometrial carcinoma and adenomyosis: a feasibility study. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1081):20170377. Manganaro L, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography to evaluate sacral nerve root abnormalities in endometriosis-related pain: a pilot study. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(1):95–101. Porpora MG, et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging–diffusion tensor imaging in predicting pain related to endometriosis: a preliminary study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(4):661–9. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. About this chapter Cite this chapter Lu, J., Leng, J. (2021). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations and Classification of Adenomyosis. In: Xue, M., Leng, J., Wong, F. (eds) Adenomyosis. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4095-4_9 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4095-4_9 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4094-7 Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4095-4 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (15)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK