⚙AI-generated summary
by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-11
ⓘ
This survey of French patients with chronic conditions found moderate shared decision-making levels, varying by condition, decision type, and patient characteristics.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it.
No clinical advice. How this works
⚙AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11
· read from full text
ⓘ
This cross-sectional survey in the ComPaRe E-cohort studied how patients with chronic conditions in France experience shared decision making, using patient-reported data collected at a single time point. The main findings characterized the level of shared decision making reported across the chronic condition group. The paper’s key limitation is its cross-sectional design, which prevents conclusions about causal relationships over time. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for
reading the paper. No clinical advice.
How this works
Abstract
BackgroundShared decision making (SDM) is a cornerstone of patient-centered care; however, little information is available on how SDM is practiced in routine care. We aimed to assess the level of SDM perceived by patients with chronic conditions for the most important health decision in the past 12 mo.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional online survey among ComPaRe, a nationwide e-cohort of patients with chronic conditions in France. The survey asked participants about their perception of SDM using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) regarding their most important health decision in the past 12 mo. We weighted the sample to represent French patients with chronic conditions and conducted regression models to identify factors associated with higher SDM levels, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.ResultsIn total, 2,087 patients were analyzed (participation rate: 34.9%). In the weighted sample, 53.0% were women, the mean (SD) age was 51.0 (15) y, and the most frequent conditions were endometriosis (27.3%), inflammatory rheumatic diseases (20.7%), and high blood pressure (19.3%). The most important health decisions in the past 12 mo were mainly about drug treatments (36.5%) or surgery (20.5%). The mean (SD) SDM-Q-9 score was 63 (27)/100 (moderate level of SDM). The highest scores were observed for cancer (70 [26]) and depression (69 [26]), whereas the lowest scores were for long COVID (54 [28]) and endometriosis (58 [25]). Decisions about surgery (71 [25]) and with specialists (64 [27]) were associated with higher scores compared with medication decisions (60 [28]) or with general practitioners (62 [27]). Multivariate analysis confirmed that a higher SDM level was associated with being a man; having higher health literacy; making decisions relating to cancer, surgery, or medical devices; and specialist involvement.ConclusionsPatients with chronic conditions in France report moderate levels of SDM, with substantial variations by condition, decision type, and patient characteristics. Findings highlight the need for tailored strategies to foster SDM in chronic care.HighlightsShared decision making (SDM) is considered a key component of the chronic disease management model.This study provides the first nationwide assessment of perceived SDM levels among patients with chronic conditions in France.Patients have a moderate overall SDM score, but significant disparities exist. Patients with less recognized conditions such as long COVID or endometriosis, low health literacy, and high treatment burden reported significantly lower SDM scores as compared with others in their care decisions.These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to improve SDM implementation.
Full text
2,108 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Highlights
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
Data availability statement
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
Cite
Cite
Cite
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Keywords
Data availability statement
Article versions
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Publication usage*
Total views and downloads: 116
*Publication usage tracking started in December 2016
Publications citing this one
Receive email alerts when this publication is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 1
- Information Needs of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Women with Endometriosis in Australia: A Qualitative Study
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
SMDM members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
SMDM members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
⚙Ask this paper
AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text
· source: oa-doi-fallbackⓘ
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text.
Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage
answers the question, we say so. How this works
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet.
This is a recent paper (2026) — citers
typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference
graph may still be filling in.
SciLite annotations
organisms 1
homo heidelbergensis
Source provenance
europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-15T06:16:59.523076+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-09-15T06:11:34.621817+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-08-02T09:40:10.667495+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine