Cook versus Edwards-Wallace: are there differences in flexible catheters?

W R Boone, Boone WR, J E Johnson, Johnson JE, Blackhurst DM, D M Blackhurst, Crane MM 4th, M M Crane
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2001 · vol. 18(1) , pp. 15–7 · doi:10.1023/a:1026490327506 · PMID:11292989 · PMC3455811
RCT OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-06 ⓘ

The provided text contains only a title comparing Cook and Edwards-Wallace flexible catheters without an abstract or source content to summarize.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Catheterization Embryo Transfer Catheterization Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Female Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Humans Male Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate Prospective Studies Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-11-08T09:52:27.483963+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T20:59:53.382863+00:00