Laparoscopic microsurgery: current and future status

C H Koh, Koh CH, G M Janik, Janik GM
Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 1999 · vol. 11(4) , pp. 401–7 · doi:10.1097/00001703-199908000-00007 · PMID:10498027
Review OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-29 ⓘ

Laparoscopic microsurgery combines laparoscopy with traditional microsurgical techniques to achieve high pregnancy rates in tubal anastomosis and enables radical excision of deep endometriosis, severe enterolysis, and adhesiolysis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-27 · read from full text ⓘ

This paper describes the integration of microsuturing and microinstruments into operative laparoscopy, creating a dynamic surgical approach that overcomes the limitations of traditional open microsurgery. The authors validate this technique primarily through high pregnancy rates following laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis, which compare favorably to established open surgery outcomes. By demonstrating the efficacy of this method for tubal repair, the study highlights its expanded utility in repairing the ureter, bladder, bowel, and vessels. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically noting that the ability to effect microsurgical repair of these structures allows for radical excision of deep endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The successful introduction of microsuturing and microinstruments for operative laparoscopy has allowed the convergence of laparoscopy and traditional microsurgery, resulting in the evolution of the 'new microsurgery'. This more dynamic approach overcomes the limitations of open microsurgery by providing continuous magnification and the benefits of a closed environment, making laparoscopy a complete surgical tool. The test model for microsurgery is tubal anastomosis, which is very dependent on operative technique to attain well-established pregnancy rates. Our cumulative pregnancy results for laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis of 76% at 12 months, 70% at 9 months, 67% at 6 months and 44% at 3 months, compares favorably to the best results achieved by traditional open microsurgery. With this validation the technique is now employed as a complete solution for all tubal surgery. The ability to effect microsurgical repair of the ureter, bladder, bowel and vessels has expanded the surgical repertoire, allowing radical excision of deep endometriosis, severe enterolysis, and adhesiolysis.
Full text 1,195 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Laparoscopic microsurgery: current and future status - Charles H. Koh - Grace M. Janik The successful introduction of microsuturing and microinstruments for operative laparoscopy has allowed the convergence of laparoscopy and traditional microsurgery, resulting in the evolution of the 'new microsurgery'. This more dynamic approach overcomes the limitations of open microsurgery by providing continuous magnification and the benefits of a closed environment, making laparoscopy a complete surgical tool. The test model for microsurgery is tubal anastomosis, which is very dependent on operative technique to attain well-established pregnancy rates. Our cumulative pregnancy results for laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis of 76% at 12 months, 70% at 9 months, 67% at 6 months and 44% at 3 months, compares favorably to the best results achieved by traditional open microsurgery. With this validation the technique is now employed as a complete solution for all tubal surgery. The ability to effect microsurgical repair of the ureter, bladder, bowel and vessels has expanded the surgical repertoire, allowing radical excision of deep endometriosis, severe enterolysis, and adhesiolysis.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Fallopian Tubes Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Laparoscopy Microsurgery Microsurgery Microsurgery Anastomosis, Surgical Anastomosis, Surgical Fallopian Tubes Fallopian Tubes Female Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-22T06:08:12.857683+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T20:59:07.345995+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine