Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for endometriosis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol: Erratum

Medicine · 2019 · vol. 98(37) , pp. e17264 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000017264 · PMID:31517879 · PMC6750312 · W4252880953
Other OA: gold CC0
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-28 ⓘ

This erratum corrects the protocol for a Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicines for endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-11-08T06:11:02.401662+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:25:31.705136+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK