Diagnosis and Management of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: Comprehensive Review
review
OA: bronze
CC0
AI-generated summary
This review updates knowledge on the etiology, diagnosis, and management of pelvic congestion syndrome, a poorly understood cause of chronic pelvic pain in women, highlighting the need for increased awareness and further research.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) is a poorly understood condition that can be associated with chronic pelvic pain and could impact quality of life. The diagnosis is often made by exclusion of other causes of pelvic pain. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our review was to provide an update on the etiology, anatomy, physiology, identification, and the therapeutic management of PCS. METHOD: We conducted a literature review involving publications from 2003 to 2024 in PubMed, Elsevier, MEDLINE, as well as manual searches of primary and review articles using keywords such as "pelvic veins", "embolization", "venography", "pelvic congestion syndrome", and "chronic pelvic pain". CONCLUSION: PCS remains poorly understood. Symptoms can be non-specific and difficult to distinguish from other diseases; yet it is an important cause of chronic pelvic pain in women. To date, there have been only a small number of randomized trials and high-level evidence is still lacking. OUTLOOK: We call for an increased awareness of PCS and additional clinical studies in a large number of patients.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
References (42)
- Concurrent Diagnosis of Adenomyosis and Congenital Uterine Anomalies: A Review via openalex
- Pelvic Congestion Syndrome via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000534651 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00094.x via openalex
- doi:10.1177/2050313x16683630 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.01.005 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1055/s-0041-1735497 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/13645706.2023.2274396 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/ijgo.14838 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/ijms222111825 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00003081-200312000-00013 via openalex
- doi:10.4103/ijves.ijves_83_18 via openalex
- doi:10.1053/j.tvir.2014.02.005 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/tomography8010008 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/jcm12154953 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.05.007 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s42155-023-00365-y via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.05.023 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/aogs.13311 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/jcm12196406 via openalex
- doi:10.1053/j.tvir.2006.08.005 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3895-7 via openalex
- doi:10.23736/s0392-9590.19.04237-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s40265-023-01957-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01323-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1259/bjr.20200881 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/07853890.2021.2014556 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s40122-021-00312-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s13019-023-02214-4 via openalex
- doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.751178 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2014.01.030 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000637 via openalex
- doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1102063 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/biom14030306 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/biomedicines12030653 via openalex
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213834 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00270-007-9160-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/8756479309345283 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/ijgo.15260 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.115 via openalex
- doi:10.2214/ajr.14.12709 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:31:37.849631+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK