Keywords
Uterus
adenomyosis
vascular involvement
A B S T R A C T
Intravascular adenomyosis is an entity described for years in the literature, but its clinical -pathologic
correlation hasn´t been studied in detail.
Objective
To study the prevalence of adenomyosis including intravascular involvement, as well as
available literature review about this pathology.
Material and methods
A retrospective observational study has been conducted in our hospital analysing
hysterectomies specimens from January to December 2020.
Results
447 hysterectomies specimens have been analysed, 68 with adenomyosis and just one with
intravascular involvement.
Conclusion
Intravascular involvement adenomyosis is a rare entity but with potential etiopa thogenic
consequence.
© 2023 Maria del Pilar Marín Sánchez. Hosting by Science Repository .
Introduction
Adenomyosis is a benign uterus condition, defined as the presence of
ectopic endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium.
Prevalence report is around 1 to 70%. This wide range show the lack of
consensus on standard diagnostic criteria , both imaging studies and
histopathology analysis [1]. Number of diagnostic strategies are being
developed in the last few years, specially focus on imaging studies like
two or three dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic
resonance imaging. In the same way, it aims to set universal standards
according to imaging studies findings.
It´s an ordinary condition, but its etiology and natural history remains
unknown now. There are four pathogenesis theories proposed: the first
one (most widely accepted) explains a m yometrial invasion from
endometrial tissue. It remains unknown the motivation of this irruption,
however it might be related to prior pregnancies (angiogenesis and
trophoblast invasion), surgeries or immunological abnormal activity
among endometrial-myometrial junction (endometrial tissue break -in
myometrium during regeneration, healing process and re-epithelization)
[2]. Another second theory claims that adenomyosis is the result of
embryonic pluripotent Müllerian remnants. This belief come from
adenomyosis finding out of myometrial thickness (recto-vaginal septum)
in a Rokitansky -Kuster-Hauser syndrome patient, thus, without
functional endometrium [3].
An additional one hypothesis states that adenomyosis would be the
consequence of endometrial basal invag ination throughout
intramyometrial linfatic system. Finally, there is the assumption that this
pathology might be arise from bone marrow stem cells. It is not clear
why adenomyosis appears in some women and not in others to date,
though, it has been noted ultrastructural differences at smooth muscle
cells level in adenomyosis uterus compared to normal [4].
Moreover, it has been recognized several risk factors that would increase
the incidence, among which is hiperestrogenic environment (early
menarche, bod y mass index, Tamoxifen previous treatment, oral
contraceptives, …). As well it has been associated with parity and
previous uterine surgeries. On the other hand, it seems to be that women
smoking would have lower risk [5]. As for the treatment, histerectomy
Intravascular Involvement in Adenomyosis: An Endometriosis Dissemination Pathway? 2
Int Jour Surg Case Rep doi:10.31487/j.IJSCR.2023.01.03 Volume 5(1): 2-3
is the currently definitive management, although there are various
alternatives that can mitigate the symptoms. We provide medical
therapies on one side, non -steroidal anti -inflammatory drug,
contraceptive oral pills, gestagenics, and even Danazol or Gonadotropin-
releasing hormone agonist (GnRH). Similarly, there are several surgical
techniques among which are endometrial ablation, hysteroscopy, uterine
arterial embolization.
Settle on the best treatment in each case is complex, because of
heterogeneous symptoms and others gynaecological conditions
associated to adenomyosis, like endometriosis or myomas. From what,
the decision will be based on factors like age, sympton severity,
reproductive desire and comorbidities. Focusing on involvement
intravascular in adenomyosis, there aren´t many recent publications
about it, for what the limited data is available. Intravascular involvement
adenomyosis has been found in a series of hysterectomies in 12.4% of
this adenomyosis uterus [6].
Materials and methods
For this review, anatomopathological reports from every hysterectomies
procedure at University Hospital Virgen Arrixaca were revised from
January to December 2020. It is therefore a retrospective observational
study. The appearance or not of adenomyosis and, the presence or not of
intravascular involvement in adenomyosis were the variables included.
Within the adenomyosis group, the age, uterine weight and concomitant
endometriosis and/or oncological diseases have been analysed too.
Results
447 hysterectomies procedures in our center. 68 (15.1%) have been
diagnosed like adenomyosis by pathologists. The mean age of these
women was 51.57 years, and the mean uterine weight was 200.77 grams.
Endometriosis was present in 29.41% (20) of adenomyosis, and 25
hysterectomies cases had been made in an oncological context (16 of
whom have been for endometrial adenocarcinoma, which represents the
23.53% of adenomyosis).
In only one surgical specimen was detected intravascular involvement,
inform like “perivascular / in travascular zones placement with growth
towards vascular lumen, always been endotelized in their surfaces
(immunohistochemical techniques confirmed)” (Figure 1). “In other
ways, active endometrial mucosa had been identified within
intramyometrial veins, su rrounded by red blood cells and plasma”
(Figure 2).
Figure 1: Adenomyosis with intravascular involvement. Focus covered by endometrium. (CD31 marker).
Figure 2: Adenomyosis with intravascular involvement. Hematoxylin-eosin stain.
Intravascular Involvement in Adenomyosis: An Endometriosis Dissemination Pathway? 3
Int Jour Surg Case Rep doi:10.31487/j.IJSCR.2023.01.03 Volume 5(1): 3-3
Discussion
In 447 hysterectomies reviewed, we recognize 15.21% of adenomyotic
uterus. Lower prevalence compared other reported series, since average
frequency was over 20 and 30% [1]. Adenomyosis and endometriosis
were considered part of the same entity until 1920s, but after define them
like different pathologies, several studies have enquired about the
relationship between them [7]. 29.41 % of adenomyosis ha ve
endometriosis associated (adenomyosis intravascular involvement
included), higher percentage compared with other studies reported, as
that of Di Donato et al., which discuss a 21.28% of correlation among
these two entities [7].
Vascular involvement can lead to a malign misdiagnosed, this is why
pathologist knowledge of this entity is required. It might be mistaken for
endometrial stromal sarcoma, which is distinguished by absence of a
macroscopic mass (unless an adenomyoma), as well as typical uterine
adenomyosis appearance. In addition, stromal cells look atrophic in
adenomyosis, in contrast to sarcoma expansive growth pattern which
could spreads outside uterus [6]. Conversely, there is another entity,
intravascular leiomyomatosis, which is smooth musc le tumoral cells
mass growing into uterine venous system. It comes along with a
leiomyoma and, sometimes with adenomyosis. Smooth muscle cells
presence would be the key of differential diagnosis with adenomyosis
with intravascular involvement [8].
Despite of have just diagnosed only an adenomyosis with intravascular
involvement, it should be considered. It may not have clinical
significance, but it might be speculated that intravascular tissue could
shatter from vessel wall giving the meaning of brain and lung
endometriosis, places where the two common histopathological
endometriosis theories (retrograde menstruation theory and coelomic
metaplasia theory) cannot justify the endometrial tissue presence [6].
Intravascular growth could involve a potential way of disease
dissemination.
Conflicts of Interest
None.
References
1. Struble J, Reid S, Bedaiwy MA (2016) Adenomyosis: A Clinical
Review of a Challenging Gynecologic Condition. J Minim Invasive
Gynecol 23: 164-185. [Crossref]
2. Benagiano G, Habiba M, Brosens I (2012) The pathophysiology of
uterine adenomyosis: an update. Fertil Steril 98: 572-579. [Crossref]
3. Enatsu A, Harada T, Yoshida S, Iwabe T, Terakawa N (2000)
Adenomyosis in a patient with the Rokitansky -Kuster-Hauser
syndrome. Fertil Steril 73: 862-863. [Crossref]
4. Mehasseb MK, Bell SC, Brown L, Pringle JH, Habiba M (2011)
Phenotypic characterisation of the inner and outer myometrium in
normal and adenomyotic uteri. Gynecol Obstet Invest 71: 217 -224.
[Crossref]
5. Parazzini F, Vercellini P, Panazza S, Chatenoud L, Oldani S et al.
(1997) Risk factors for adenomyosis. Hum Reprod 12: 1275 -1279.
[Crossref]
6. Meenakshi M, McCluggage WG (2010) Vascular involvement i n
adenomyosis: report of a large series of a common phenomenon with
observations on the pathogenesis of adenomyosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol
29: 117-121. [Crossref]
7. Di Donato N, Montanari G, Benfenati A, Leonardi D, Bertoldo V et al.
(2014) Prevalence of adenomyosis in women undergoing surgery for
endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 181: 289 -293.
[Crossref]
8. Hirschowitz L, Mayall FG, G anesan R, McCluggage WG (2013)
Intravascular adenomyomatosis: expanding the morphologic spectrum
of intravascular leiomyomatosis. Am J Surg Pathol 37: 1395 -1400.
[Crossref]
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.