Steroid Metabolome Profiling Identifies a Unique Androgen Hormone Signature Associated with Endometriosis

preprint OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08

This study identified a unique steroid metabolome signature in women with endometriosis, characterized by increased androgens and altered 11-ketotestosterone metabolism, enabling accurate prediction of the condition.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This study performed serum steroid metabolome profiling using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in healthy controls (n=57) and women with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis (n=159) to search for endocrine biomarkers. Women with endometriosis showed a distinct androgen-related steroid signature, including increased classic and 11-oxygenated androgens and metabolic patterns linked to 11-ketotestosterone production. The metabolomics data were used to train a supervised machine learning model that discriminated endometriosis from controls with high accuracy (reported AUC=0.99), and a refined model identified over 95% of patients in a blinded validation sample set, with data partitioned into train and validation groups as a caveat to potential overfitting. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—specifically identifying an androgen (including 11-oxygenated androgen) steroid metabolome signature as a diagnostic biomarker.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Endometriosis is a chronic, hormone-dependent condition that affects 190 million women worldwide. There are no validated biomarkers for endometriosis and this delays diagnosis and treatment. We performed serum steroid metabolome profiling in healthy controls (n=57) and women with laparoscopically-confirmed endometriosis (n=159) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Women with endometriosis had a distinct steroid signature characterised by increased concentrations of classic and 11-oxygenated androgens, and altered metabolism associated with 11-ketotestosterone production. Metabolomic data were used to generate a supervised machine learning model to predict diagnostic outcome. ROC curve analysis demonstrated robust discrimination between healthy controls and endometriosis patients (AUC=0.99) with 96.84% positive-, and 92.86% negative-predictive power. Data were partitioned into train and validation groups, and a refined model identified >95% of endometriosis patients in a blinded sample set. These data reframe endometriosis as an androgen-dominant condition and present a unique opportunity to develop novel diagnostic approaches using 11-oxygenated androgens as biomarkers.
Full text 60,615 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 9 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic, hormone -dependent condition that affects 190 million women 25 worldwide. There are no validated biomarkers for endometriosis and this delays diagnosis and treatment. We performed serum steroid metabolome profiling in healthy controls (n=57) and women with laparoscopically-confirmed endometriosis (n=159) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Women with endometriosis had a distinct steroid signature characterised by 30 increased concentrations of classic and 11 -oxygenated androgens, and altered metabolism associated with 11-ketotestosterone production. Metabolomic data were used to generate a supervised machine learning model to predict diagnostic outcome. ROC curve analysis demonstrated robust discrimination between healthy controls and endometriosis patients (AUC=0.99) with 96.84% positive-, and 92.86% negative-35 predictive power. Data were partitioned into train and validation groups, and a refined model identified >95% of endometriosis patients in a blinded sample set. These data reframe endometriosis as an androgen-dominant condition and present a unique opportunity to develop novel diagnostic approaches using 11 -oxygenated androgens as biomarkers. 40 . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 3

Introduction

Endometriosis is a chronic, hormone-dependent condition that affects an estimated 190 million women worldwide 1. It is characterised by the presence of ‘endometrial-like’ tissue (referred to as ‘lesions’) outside the uterus, most commonly within the pelvic peritoneal cavity. Women experience life-altering symptoms including chronic pelvic pain and infertility. In addition to 45 impacts on quality of life, endometriosis also has serious financial consequences limiting health, wellbeing and life potential 2. Diagnosis is a key clinical challenge in endometriosis, which prolongs suffering and delays treatment. Internationally, overall time to diagnosis ranges from 5 to 12 years3, with a median delay of 8 years reported in the UK4. Establishing a correct diagnosis of endometriosis is often 50 problematic because the presenting symptoms are associated with other conditions and this makes clinical recognition of endometriosis challenging 5,6. Thus, the d iagnosis of endometriosis usually involves a combination of clinical evaluation and imaging techniques 7. However, the gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis, as recommended by international guidelines, is laparoscopic visualisation of the lesions performed by specialised 55 gynaecologists 8-10. Endometriosis is broadly categorised into three subtypes : superficial peritoneal, ovarian and deep. Nevertheless, it is most commonly described according to the revised scoring system of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) which ranges from Stage I to Stage IV based on the location and extent of lesions, as well as adhesions, visualized at surgery 11. Although widely adopted, this surgical classification does 60 not correlate with symptom severity 12. Additionally, diagnostic laparoscopy is invasive, costly, and carries significant risks, including injury to pelvic organs 13. Non-invasive diagnostic approaches for endometriosis could provide earlier definitive diagnosis and eliminate surgery- associated complications. However, unlike other similarly common diseases, there are no known biomarkers for endometriosis. 65 Research focused on identifying endometriosis biomarkers has been hampered by low - powered studies, inter-study variability and by the identification of markers with low predictive . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 4 value 14. Until now, there has been no single blood or urinary biomarker approach that has been validated 15. Recent attention has focussed on screening salivary miRNAs 16 and the serum proteome as potential diagnostic approach es but independent validation studies are 70 yet to be reported 17,18. A common limitation of endometriosis biomarker studies is that they seek to screen out differential targets without consideration of the underlying biology, limiting their utility for further development as therapeutic targets and prognostic markers. Endometriosis is a hormone -dependent disorder but utilising endocrine differences for diagnostic purposes is challenging. Estrogens are considered the main disease driver due to 75 their established roles in promoting inflammation, angiogenesis and proliferation of endometriosis lesions 19. Although estrogen concentrations are increased within lesions there are no reported differences in circulating estrogens in women with endometriosis 20,21. Furthermore, estrogen concentrations are highly variable across the menstrual cycle, limiting their potential utility as diagnostic biomarkers. In contrast , androgens, which can be derived 80 from both the ovary and the adrenal, have limited cyclical variation in women. C lassic androgens, such as testosterone (T) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), regulate various cellular processes implicated in endometriosis, inc luding proliferation, tissue remodeling, and inflammation 22. Testosterone concentrations are increased in endometriosis lesions and this is associated with changes in androgen-regulated genes 23. 85 Recent studies suggest that adrenal -derived 11 -oxygenated androgens are importan t components of the androgen pool, particularly in women 24, but little is known about the potential contribution of 11-oxygenated androgens to endometriosis pathophysiology. 11KT circulates at concentrations equivalent to or greater than T in women and has similar androgenic activity , consistent with a potential role in regulating androgen -dependent 90 processes 25. 11-oxygenated androgens are now recognised for the ir roles in endocrine disorders such as polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) 26 but whether they also play a role in endometriosis is yet to be determined. . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 5 Given the potential importance of androgens to endometriosis pathophysiology and the limited data on profiling of androgen metabolites, we sought to define the androgen metabolome in 95 endometriosis and investigate its potential utility as a diagnostic approach. Serum samples from women with laparoscopically-confirmed endometriosis (n= 159) and healthy controls (n=61) were profiled using a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay to simultaneously measure classic and 11 -oxygenated androgens. Women with endometriosis had a distinct steroid signature characterised by increased concentrations of 100 classic and 11 -oxygenated androgens and altered metabolism associated with 11 KT production. In predictive statistical models, 11KT and related metabolites demonstrated significant potential as diagnostic biomarkers and could robustly distinguish between healthy controls and women with endometriosis. These data reframe endometriosis as an androgen- dependent disorder and highlight the potential for 11-oxygenated androgens to be used as 105 diagnostic biomarkers. . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 6

Results

Endometriosis is associated with an altered androgen hormone signature Androgens and their precursors were quantified using LC -MS/MS in serum samples from healthy controls (HC; n= 57) and women with endometriosis ( ENDO; n= 159). The 110 concentrations of ‘classic’ androgens; DHEA, A4, T and DHT and 11-oxygenated androgens; 11OHA4, 11OHT, 11KA4 and 11KT were determined (Figure 1 and Table 1). DHEA (Figure 1A; p<0.0001), A4 (Figure 1B; p<0.0001) and T (Figure 1C; p<0.0001) were significantly higher in serum samples from women with endometriosis compared to healthy controls (Table 1 ‘All’). Concentrations of DHT were not significantly different between groups 115 (Figure 1D). The 11-oxygenated androgen precursor metabolites , 11OHA4 (Figure 1 E; p<0.05) and 11KA4 (Figure 1 F; P<0.0001), were decreased, and the active 11-oxygenated androgens, 11OHT (Figure 1G; p<0.0001) and 11KT (Figure 1H; p<0.0001), were increased in women with endometriosis (Table 1 ‘All’) . Consistent with previous reports 27 ,11- oxygenated androgens did not differ by menstrual cycle phase ( Supplementary Table 1). 120 Neither classic nor 11 -oxygenated androgen concentrations correlated with age, although 11OHT trended to positive correlation (r=0.1267, p=0.0636). Only 11KA4 negatively correlated with BMI (r=-0.2029, p=0.0037; Supplementary Table 2). Classic and 11-oxygenated androgens do not differ by rASRM stage To assess whether androgen concentrations were associated with disease severity in 125 endometriosis, data were stratified according to rASRM stage. Broadly, there were no significant differences in steroid concentrations between rASRM stages for any of the analytes assessed. Analytes that were increased in the unstratified group (ENDO /‘All’) were also increased in each rASRM stage compared to healthy controls (HC) (Figure 1 I-P; Table 1). Notably, median concentrations of DHEA (p<0.0001), A4 (p<0.0001) and T (p<0.0001) were 130 highest in Stage I endometriosis and significantly higher than healthy controls (Figure 1 I-P; Table 1). Similarly, concentrations of 11OHT (p<0.001) and 11KT (p<0.0001) were highest in . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 7 Stage I endometriosis and significantly higher than healthy controls (Figure 1I-P; Table 1). Concentrations of T and 11KT were significantly elevated in women with Stage I, II, III and IV endometriosis compared to healthy controls, whereas 11KA4 was significantly reduced in 135 women with all stages of endometriosis compared to healthy controls (Figure 1I-P). The greatest difference in androgen concentrations compared to healthy controls was in patients classified as Stage I. Median concentrations of T, 11KA4 and 11KT were modestly, inversely decreased with stage but overall, there was no distinct steroid signature associated with a given rASRM stage. 140 Androgen metabolism is altered in endometriosis and biased towards production of 11 - ketotestosterone The correlation between serum androgen analytes was assessed in healthy contro ls and women with endometriosis using Pearson correlation (Figure 2A and B, Supplementary Table 3). In healthy controls, closely related metabolites exhibited a significant positive correlation. 145 This included classic androgens ; A4 and T (r=0.8, p=1.59E-12) and T and DHT ( r=0.5, p=6.37E-06), as well as 11-oxygenated androgens; 11OHA4 and 11KA4 ( r=0.6, p=8.2E-07) and 11OHT and 11KT (r=0.9, p=5.53E-20). In women with endometriosis , additional metabolites that were not correlated in healthy controls were found to be positively correlated. This included a significant positive correlation between classic and 11-oxygenated androgens, 150 as well as a greater correlation amongst all 11-oxygenated androgen metabolites. This was characterised by DHEA, A4, T and DHT each being significantly positively correlated with all 11-oxygenated androgen metabolites (Figure 2A and B, Supplementary Table 3). Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between 11KT and 11OHA4 (r=0.6, p=1.82E-19), 11KT and 11KA4 (r=0.7, p=7.68E-22), 11OHT and 11OHA4 (r=0.7, p=2.14E-24), and 11OHT 155 and 11KA4 ( r=0.6, p=3.94E-17) in women with endometriosis that was absent in healthy controls (Figure 2A and B, Supplementary Table 3). To investigate if these changes were indicative of altered metabolism in women with endometriosis, we estimated the activities of enzymes required for 11-oxygenated androgen . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 8 production by calculating substrate to product ratios (Figure 2; 11-β-hydroxylase (CYP11B1), 160 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (HSD11B2) and Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3 (AKR1C3)). CYP11B1 and HSD11B2 enzymes mediate interconversion and activation of 11-oxygenated androgens. The ratios of 11OHA4/A4 and 11OHT/T (mediated by CYP11B1) were significantly decreased in women with endometriosis (Figure 2C and D ), consistent with decreased bioavailability of the precursors 11OHA4 and 11OHT. The ratio of 165 11KA4/11OHA4 ( mediated by HSD11B2) was significantly decreased in women with endometriosis (Figure 2E, p<0.0001), consistent with decreased bioavailability of the precursor 11KA4. In contrast, the ratio of 11KT/11OHT was modestly increased between healthy controls and women with endometriosis (Figure 2F, p<0.0001) suggesting metabolism favouring production of 11KT . Ratios for the reciprocal inactivation of 11KA4 and 11KT , 170 mediated by HSD11B128, were also calculated. The ratio of 11OHA4/11KA4 was increased (Supplementary figure 1A, p<0.0002) and 11OHT/11KT controls was decreased (Supplementary figure 1B, p<0.0002) in women with endometriosis compared to healthy controls. AKR1C3 is a multifunction al enzyme that plays a pivotal role in all pathways to androgen 175 production including that of T, 11OHT and 11KT. The ratio of T/A4 (mediated by AKR1C3) did not differ between groups (Supplementary figure 1C), but other AKR1C3 activities determined by the ratios of 11OHT/11OHA4 and 11KT/11KA4 were significantly higher in women with endometriosis (Figure 2G and H; p<0.0001), suggestive of greater production of 11OHT and 11KT in women with endometriosis. Taken together, these data are consistent with a shift in 180 metabolism towards production of 11KT (Figure 2I). Androgen concentrations can be used to discriminate between healthy controls and women with endometriosis Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of serum androgen concentrations was performed to identify if specific androgen metabolites or ratios could be used to 185 discriminate between healthy controls and women with endometriosis (Supplementary Table . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 9 4). The androgen analytes T, 11KA4 and 11KT exhibited best sensitivity and specificity with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.815 (p<0.001), 0.822 (p<0.001), and 0.815 (p<0.001) respectively (Figure 3A-C). ROC curve analysis of calculated enzyme ratios was also performed as these data have 190 reduced inter -sample variability and provide a better indicator of the proposed altered metabolism found in women with endometriosis. Enzyme ratios associated with metabolism of 11 -oxygenated androgens were assessed ( Supplementary Table 4). The ratios 11OHA4/A4, 11OHT/11OHA4 and 11KT/11KA4 had best sensitivity and specificity with AUC values of 0.857 (p<0.001), 0.817 (p<0.001), and AUC of 0.968 (p<0.001) respectively (Figure 195 3D-F). The ratio of 11KT/11KA4 provided robust discrimination between healthy controls and women with endometriosis with a sensitivity of 92 .36% and specificity of 9 0.91% and a likelihood ratio of 10.16 (Figure 3G). These data suggest that changes in androgen metabolism could be used as predictors of endometriosis diagnostic outcome. Development of a predictive model using supervised machine learning 200 To complement and extend these findings, androgen metabolome data were used to train a predictive model using multiple logistic regression. Androgen concentrations; DHEA, A4, T, DHT, 11OHA4, 11OHT and 11KT, were used as dependent variables and diagnosed endometriosis (as a binary) was the outcome variable. BMI was also included in the model to account for any independent effects of th is variable (Figure 3H). ROC curve analysis 205 demonstrated excellent di scrimination between healthy controls and women with endometriosis with AUC of 0.99 (Figure 3I; p<0.0001, CI 0.9878 to 1.000) providing further improvement on discrimination informed by single analytes or ratios (Figure 3A -G). The predicted probability for outcome was calculated for each sample using a classification cut-off of 0.5. The negative predictive power of the multiple logistic regression model was 9 2.86% 210 and positive predictive power 96.84% (Figure 3H and J) consistent with a robust and accurate model for predicting diagnostic outcome in endometriosis. . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 10 Train and validation using a refined statistical model has robust positive predictive power for diagnostic outcome To assess how a predictive model could perform when blinded to outcome, the whole data set 215 was partitioned into train and validation groups. The training set contained dependent and outcome variables for an arbitrary subset of healthy controls (n=21) and women with endometriosis (n=21) and the remaining validation set contained dependent variables but was blinded to outcome variable (n=138). Comparative modelling was used initially to identify the most robust analytes to include in a refined predictive model (not shown). Multiple logistic 220 regression was used to fit a predictive model using BMI, 11OHA4, 11KA4 and 11KT as dependent variables and diagnosed endometriosis as the outcome variable (Figure 4A, B). ROC curve analysis of the simplified model demonstrated excellent discrimination between healthy controls and women with endometriosis with AUC of 0. 97 (Figure 4C; p<0.0001, CI 0.9124 to 1.000). The estimated negative predictive power of the model was 94.74% with a 225 positive predictive power of 95.24% (Figure 4A and D). The actual performance of the model was assessed using the remaining data with outcome blinded (validation set) and included separate performance estimates according to stratification by rASRM stage (Figure 4E). The predicted outcome was calculated for each sample, using a classification cut -off of 0.5 . In the validation dataset, the sensitivity of the 230 refined model was 95.65% with accurate prediction observed for all disease stage stratifications (Figure 4E); including grouped minimal/mild ENDO (Stage I + II; 94% sensitivity), moderate/severe ENDO (Stage III + IV; 96.55% sensitivity) or by individual rASRM stage (I - IV; range 91.2-100% sensitivity). Consistent with univariate analysis, 11KT had a large odds ratio estimate, indicating the importance of this variable in determining diagnostic outcome. 235 These data confirm the utility of using androgen concentrations to predict diagnostic outcome, with a refined model accurately identifying >95% of women with endometriosis in a blinded cohort. . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 11 240 . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 12

Discussion

In summary, we sought to define the androgen metabolome in endometriosis and investigate its potential utility as a diagnostic approach. We discovered a disease -specific hormone signature that identifies endometriosis with high specificity and sensitivity. This is 245 characterised by increased concentrations of classic and 11-oxygenated androgens in serum, reframing endometriosis as an androgen -dependent disorder. Elevated androgens were associated with changes in activities of androgen synthesis enzymes, including AKR1 C3, indicative of altered metabolism that results in increased production of 11KT in women with endometriosis. When used alone or in combination with multiple logistic regression, androgen 250 measurements provided a strong predictive performance for endometri osis using both comprehensive and targeted analyte statistical models. When data were partitioned into train and validation cohorts, a refined model using only 11OHA4, 11KA4 and 11KT in combination with BMI was sufficient to correctly identify >95% of women with endometriosis in a blinded sample set. These data provide a significant breakthrough in the search for endometriosis 255 blood biomarkers and place 11-oxygenated androgens at the cornerstone of a new diagnostic approach for endometriosis. Several blood biomarkers for endometriosis have been proposed , such as the glycoprotein CA-125, inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α and MCP -1 [CCL2]), as well as the pro-angiogenic factor VEGF. Although these markers have been found to be elevated in 260 women with endometriosis, they lack specificity and have not been validated in larger studies. A recent multi -centre study that assessed 54 blood -based biomarkers in samples from 919 women with endometriosis found CA-125 offered best discrimination between endometriosis cases and pathology -free symptomatic controls. However, the AUC for CA -125 in this comparison was 0.645 and thus had limited accuracy as a diagnostic biomarker 29. Critically, 265 CA-125 is elevated in other conditions including ovarian and endometrial cancers, further limiting its utility as a diagnostic biomarker in endometriosis 30,31. The use of CA -125 as a . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 13 diagnostic or screening tool is not recommended within the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology endometriosis guidelines 32. Emerging results from a proteomic screen of serum samples from a large cohort of 805 270 patients showed promise using a combination of ten serum protein biomarkers with strong predictive accuracy for the diagnosis of endometriosis, particularly those with severe endometriosis (Stage IV) 18. Further studies are needed to establish if these candidate markers are specific to endometriosis and if their expression is affected by age, menstrual cycle stage or hormone treatment. Similarly, an undisclosed panel of 109 salivary miRNAs were reported 275 to detect endometriosis with high sensitivity (96.2%) and specificity (95.1%) in an interim validation study, but whether these markers are variable across populations and endometriosis subtypes is not yet known 33. An ideal biomarker for endometriosis would need to overcome the limitations of current approaches and should have high sensit ivity and specificity, reflect endometriosis 280 pathophysiology, be consistent across subtypes and not vary by menstrual cycle stage or with hormone treatment. Based on our results, 11-oxygenated androgens represent a significant improvement on other endometriosis biomarkers as they fulfil all of these key criteria. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to profile 11 -oxygenated androgens in endometriosis. However, larger and more representative cohorts will be needed to understand 285 if this profiling is generalisable across different demographics and endometriosis subtypes . The participants in our study were mostly of European ethnicity and future studies should ensure broader representation and inclusion to limit bias in this factor. Compari sons to other endocrine disorders will also be important to understand distinct features of endometriosis. Although there are major differences between the androgen analyte concentrations in 290 endometriosis in our study and those previously published for PCOS, such as increased rather than decreased concentrations of 11OHA4 and 11KA4 in PCOS, an integrated analysis of both disorders would provide the greatest resolution on their distinct hormone profiles. We have profiled samples from all stages of endometrio sis, but our study cohort was more . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 14 representative of patients with minimal/mild disease ( Stage I and II; 62.9% of cohort) rather 295 than moderate/severe disease ( Stage II and IV; 37.1% of cohort), and predominantly presented with pain rather than infertility symptoms. We did not detect a distinct hormone profile associated with endometriosis subtypes but it is possible that naturally occurring groups within the data could be identified using cluster analysis approaches in larger datasets. This could add further resolution to existing staging and subtyping methods used in endometriosis. 300 This is important because current disease staging approaches do not correlate with severity of symptoms 12 which in part compounds the diagnostic challenges associated with endometriosis. We found no correlation between an drogen concentrations and pain scores in women with endometriosis but the majority of patients in our cohort presented with pelvic pain which may 305 bias interpretation. Androgens play a complex role in pain perception in women with endometriosis that is yet to be fully defined. An inverse correlation between measures of chronic pain and androgen levels has been reported in women with dysmenorrhea but this study did not directly assess women with endometriosis 34. Notably, in our study we measured multiple androgen analytes in women with laparoscopically -confirmed endometriosis and 310 correlated these with pain scores based on the pain domain of the EHP -30 questionnaire: a reliable and validated questionnaire for assessing the health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis 35. This direct comparison found no significant correlation between androgens and pain in women with endometriosis. Although androgens did not correlate with endometriosis symptoms or subtypes, we believe 315 that they may have a direct role in endometriosis pathogenesis. Androgens can regulate processes associated with formation of endometriosis lesions and the androgen receptor has been identified as an endometriosis -associated transcription factor 36. 11KT has similar potency to T in activating androgen -dependent processes 25 and was detected at higher concentrations than T in women with endometriosis in the current study. We propose that 320 androgen excess in endometriosis drives pathophysiology through direct regulation of . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 15 androgen-dependent processes (via T and 11KT) in endome trial and endometriotic tissues and by acting as obligate substrates for aromatase in lesions (via A4 and T) to fuel estrogenic processes. Changes to androgen metabolism may also have systemic effects that increase risk of lesion formation over the life course, including changes to innate and adaptive immune 325 cell function and inflammation as reported in other contexts of androgen excess such as PCOS 37. This may explain how retrograde menstruation can lead to lesion formation in some women but not others. Concentrations of 11KT are not dimin ished by oral contraceptives or gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue-mediated ovarian suppression 27. If 11KT is driving endometriosis 330 pathogenesis, this may explain why these widely used medical treatments for endometriosis- associated pain are ineffective in some women 27. Previously, the synthetic androgen danazol was found to be effective in the medical management of endometriosis-associated pain 38 but its use was stopped due to unacceptable masculinizing side-effects. The mechanism of action of danazol in endometriosis has not been fully characterised but it has been shown to inhibit 335 adrenal androgen synthesis via suppression of androgen metabolising enzyme activity in other contexts 39. We have found that adrenal androgen production was a key feature of endometriosis; as characteri sed by altered activities of HSD 11B2, HSD11B1 and AKR1C3 and the enhanced biosynthesis of 11KT. Thus, the efficacy of danazol in endometriosis may be due to its action on androgen metabolism, which reframes our perception of the 340 pharmacodynamics of this drug. Although danazol was poorly tolerated, these results support revisiting danazol (e.g. administered by a local delivery system) or a more selective derivative as a therapeutic approach in endometriosis. 11KT is now considered the most biologically relevant androgen in women 24 and we have identified that endometriosis is associated with 11KT excess. These data highli ght the 345 importance of androgens in endometriosis, both as a fundamental feature of the pathophysiology and as a potential disease driver. When combined with predictive modelling androgen metabolite concentrations can be used to robustly distinguish between healthy . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 16 controls and women with endometriosis. Collectively, these data signify a paradigm shift in our understanding of endometriosis and represent a unique opportunity to develop rapid, non -350 surgical approaches for endometriosis diagnosis and management.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (Fellowship 220656/Z/20/Z to DAG , Investigator Award 209492/Z/17/Z to WA), Medical Research Council (Grant MRC/IAA/002 to DAG, program grant MR/N024524/1 to PTKS, and program grant MC_UP_1605/ 15 to WA ) 355 and the Institute for Regeneration and Repair Innovators award (funded by WT ITPA to DAG). Research conducted by the Edinburgh EXPPECT group that contributed to collection of biospecimens has been supported by grants from the MRC, Wellcome Trust, NIHR, CSO, and Wellbeing of Women. We thank members of the EXPPECT Edinburgh group, Frances Collins and Ann Doust, for support with participant recruitment and biosample collection. For the 360 purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 17

Materials and methods

Study approval Written informed consent was obtained prior to study participation from healthy volunteers 365 identified through advertisement. Ethical approval was granted by the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Ethical Review Committees of the University of Birmingham, UK (ERN_17-0494, ERN_17-0494B). Written informed consent was obtained from all endometriosis study participants prior to surgery. Ethical approval was granted by the Lothian Research Ethics Committee (LREC 370 11/AL/0376), South Central-Hampshire A research ethics committee (IRAS:237815 REC

Reference

19/SC/0449) and Wales REC 6 A research ethics committee (IRAS 268806; REC ref: 19/WA/0271). Methods were carried out in accordance with Local Tissue Governance guidelines and international EPHect guidelines (https://endometriosisfoundation.org/ephect/). Patient cohorts 375 Inclusion criteria for healthy controls (HC) were pre-menopausal women aged 18 years or above. A standardized questionnaire was used to record demographic data including age and BMI; the use of hormonal contraceptives and menopausal status were recorded. Healthy control data were selected from a broader cohort of participants as detailed in Schiffer et al . to match age range of patient cohort in the current study 27. 380 Eligible participants were women with chronic pelvic pain (aged 18 –50 years) of >3 months duration who were undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected endometriosis in NHS Lothian. Pelvic pain was defined as pain located within the true pelvis (between and below the anterior iliac crests). Participants at the Liverpool Women’s Hospital were those undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected endometriosis that were recruited from endometriosis 385 or general gynaecology clinics. Diagnostic outcome, age, BMI, menstrual cycle stage and hormone status were obtained and recorded along with other key clinical data. Diagnosis of endometriosis was confirmed macroscopically at laparoscopy ( ENDO). Endometriosis was . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 18 subsequently classified according to the revis ed scoring system of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) which ranges from Stage I to Stage IV based on the location 390 and extent of lesions, as well as adhesions, visualized at surgery 11. Exclusion criteria were any acute or chronic disease affecting steroid biosynthesis or metabolism (including polycystic ovarian syndrome; PCOS) and the intake of any medication known to interfere with steroid biosynthesis or metabolism. Participants using hormonal contraceptives (combined oral contraceptives, contraceptive depot injection, or implant) were 395 excluded. Serum steroid analysis All venous blood samples were collected in the morning and, in the case of women with suspected endometriosis, prior to anaesthesia on the morning of surgery. All blood samples were collected in serum-separating tubes. After centrifugation, aspirated serum was aliquoted 400 and stored at -80oC. Serum samples from women with endometriosis (n= 159) and healthy controls (n= 57) were profiled using a sensitive liquid chromatography tandem -mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay to simultaneously measure 21 steroid hormones/metabolites. Serum steroids were quantified using a previously published and validated approach for multi-405 steroid profiling using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) assay 40. Briefly, 200 μL of serum was mixed with stable isotope -labelled internal standards and following protein precipitation with 50 μL acetonitrile samples were extracted by liquid –liquid extraction with 1 mL methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE). The MTBE organic phase was removed, dried and reconstituted in 50/50 methanol/water. Steroids were chromatographically 410 separated using a Phenomenex Luna Omega C18 column (1.6 µm, 100Å, 2.1 mm × 50 mm) and a water (0.1% formic acid) –methanol gradient. Ammonium fluoride was introduced by post-column infusion to aid ionisation. Steroids were quantified relative to a calibration series ranging from 0.02 to 250 ng/mL with inclusion of a blank calibration point. Analysis was . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 19 performed on a Waters Xevo TQ -XS mass spectrometer using electrosp ray ionization in 415 positive ion mode. Analyte key Serum analytes were grouped as follows . Classic Androgens ; dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), androstenedione (A4), testosterone (T) and dihydrostestosterone (DHT). 11- oxygenated androgens ; 11β-hydroxyandrostenedione (11OHA4), 11β -hydroxytestosterone 420 (11OHT), 11-ketoandrostenedione (11KA4) and 11-ketotestosterone (11KT). Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 10. Undetected steroid concentrations or data below the LLOQ were replaced by 0.5×LLOQ for statistical purposes . Data were summarized using mean ± SD, presented for healthy controls (N=57) and women 425 with endometriosis (N=159) or as median ± interquartile range in tables, as indicated . T test was used to compare the difference in the means of the two groups. Two -way ANOVA was used to determine the significance between treatments in grouped data. Non -parametric testing was utili sed where sample sizes were insufficient to confirm normality of data distribution; Mann–Whitney test to assess variance between two groups or Kruskal–Wallis test 430 was used to assess differences between multiple groups . Criterion for significance was P < 0.05. Correlation between analytes was assessed using Pearson matrix. Discrimination between cohorts using metabolite concentrations or ratios was assessed by ROC curve analysis. Predictive modelling for multiple analytes was performed using multiple logisti c regression. 435 . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 20

References

1. Horne, A.W. & Missmer, S.A. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis. Bmj 379, e070750 (2022). 2. Berkley, K.J., Rapkin, A.J. & Papka, R.E. The pains of endometriosis. Science 308, 1587-1589 440 (2005). 3. De Corte, P., Klinghardt, M., von Stockum, S. & Heinemann, K. Time to Diagnose Endometriosis: Current Status, Challenges and Regional Characteristics—A Systematic Literature Review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 132, 118-130 (2025). 445 4. Ghai, V., Jan, H., Shakir, F., Haines, P. & Kent, A. Diagnostic delay for superficial and deep endometriosis in the United Kingdom. J Obstet Gynaecol 40, 83-89 (2020). 5. Zondervan Krina, T., Becker Christian, M. & Missmer Stacey, A. Endometriosis. New England Journal of Medicine 382, 1244-1256 (2020). 6. As-Sanie, S., et al. Endometriosis: A Review. JAMA (2025). 450 7. Nisenblat, V., Bossuyt, P.M., Farquhar, C., Johnson, N. & Hull, M.L. Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2, CD009591 (2016). 8. Kuznetsov, L., Dworzynski, K., Davies, M., Overton, C. & Comm, G. GUIDELINES Diagnosis and management of endometriosis: summary of NICE guidance. Bmj-Brit Med J 358(2017). 9. Becker, C.M., et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis†. Human Reproduction Open 2022, 455 hoac009 (2022). 10. Singh, S.S., et al. Guideline No. 449: Diagnosis and Impact of Endometriosis – A Canadian Guideline. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 46(2024). 11. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril 67, 817-821 (1997). 460 12. Vercellini, P., et al. Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms: a multivariate analysis of over 1000 patients. Human Reproduction 22, 266-271 (2007). 13. Roy, S.N. The risks of laparoscopic surgery: I. Gynecological Surgery 3, 315-319 (2006). 14. Brulport, A., et al. An integrated multi-tissue approach for endometriosis candidate 465 biomarkers: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 22, 21 (2024). 15. Nisenblat, V., et al. Blood biomarkers for the non‐invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2016). 16. Bendifallah, S., et al. MicroRNome analysis generates a blood-based signature for endometriosis. Sci Rep 12, 4051 (2022). 470 17. Scheck, S.M., et al. Non-invasive tests for endometriosis are here; how reliable are they, and what should we do with the results? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 64, 168-170 (2024). 18. Schoeman, E.M., et al. Identification of plasma protein biomarkers for endometriosis and the development of statistical models for disease diagnosis. Hum Reprod (2024). 19. Chantalat, E., et al. Estrogen Receptors and Endometriosis. in International Journal of 475 Molecular Sciences, Vol. 21 (2020). 20. Huhtinen, K., et al. Endometrial and endometriotic concentrations of estrone and estradiol are determined by local metabolism rather than circulating levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97, 4228-4235 (2012). 21. Mercorio, A., Giampaolino, P., Romano, A., Dällenbach, P. & Pluchino, N. Is intracrinology of 480 endometriosis relevant in clinical practice? A systematic review on estrogen metabolism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 13, 950866 (2022). 22. Simitsidellis, I., Saunders, P.T.K. & Gibson, D.A. Androgens and endometrium: new insights and new targets. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 465, 48-60 (2018). . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 21 23. Huhtinen, K., et al. Intra-Tissue Steroid Profiling Indicates Differential Progesterone and 485 Testosterone Metabolism in the Endometrium and Endometriosis Lesions. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 99, E2188–E2197 (2014). 24. Storbeck, K.-H. & O’Reilly, M.W. The clinical and biochemical significance of 11-oxygenated androgens in human health and disease. European Journal of Endocrinology 188, R98-R109 (2023). 490 25. Pretorius, E., et al. 11-Ketotestosterone and 11-Ketodihydrotestosterone in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: Potent Androgens Which Can No Longer Be Ignored. PLOS ONE 11, e0159867 (2016). 26. O’Reilly, M.W., et al. 11-Oxygenated C19 Steroids Are the Predominant Androgens in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 102, 840-495 848 (2017). 27. Schiffer, L., et al. Classic and 11-oxygenated androgens in serum and saliva across adulthood: a cross-sectional study analyzing the impact of age, body mass index, and diurnal and menstrual cycle variation. Eur J Endocrinol 188(2023). 28. Schiffer, L., et al. Inhibition of the glucocorticoid-activating enzyme 11β-hydroxysteroid 500 dehydrogenase type 1 drives concurrent 11-oxygenated androgen excess. The FASEB Journal 38, e23574 (2024). 29. Burghaus, S., et al. Multicenter evaluation of blood-based biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis and adenomyosis: A prospective non-interventional study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 164, 305-314 (2024). 505 30. Duk, J.M., Aalders, J.G., Fleuren, G.J. & de Bruijn, H.W. CA 125: a useful marker in endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155, 1097-1102 (1986). 31. Charkhchi, P., et al. CA125 and Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 12(2020). 32. Kuznetsov, L., Dworzynski, K., Davies, M. & Overton, C. Diagnosis and management of 510 endometriosis: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 358, j3935 (2017). 33. Bendifallah, S., et al. Validation of a Salivary miRNA Signature of Endometriosis — Interim Data. NEJM Evidence 2, EVIDoa2200282 (2023). 34. Evans, S.F., et al. The Relationship Between Androgens and Days per Month of Period Pain, Pelvic Pain, Headache, and TLR4 Responsiveness of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in 515 Young Women with Dysmenorrhoea. J Pain Res 14, 585-599 (2021). 35. Jones, G.L., et al. A systematic review to determine use of the Endometriosis Health Profiles to measure quality of life outcomes in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update 30, 186-214 (2024). 36. Yang, H., Kang, K., Cheng, C., Mamillapalli, R. & Taylor, H.S. Integrative Analysis Reveals 520 Regulatory Programs in Endometriosis. Reprod Sci 22, 1060–1072 (2015). 37. Shabbir, S., et al. The interplay between androgens and the immune response in polycystic ovary syndrome. Journal of Translational Medicine 21, 259 (2023). 38. Selak, V., Farquhar, C., Prentice, A. & Singla, A. Danazol for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Cd000068 (2007). 525 39. Stillman, R.J., Fencl, M.D., Schiff, I., Barbieri, R.L. & Tulchinsky, D. Inhibition of Adrenal Steroidogenesis by Danazol in Vivo**Presented at the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting of The American Fertility Society, March 18 to 22, 1980, Houston, Tex. Fertil Steril 33, 401-406 (1980). 40. Schiffer, L., et al. Multi-steroid profiling by UHPLC-MS/MS with post-column infusion of 530 ammonium fluoride. Journal of Chromatography B 1209, 123413 (2022). . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 22

Results

– figures and tables Table 1 535 Table 1. Serum steroid concentrations of classic and 11-oxygenated androgens in healthy controls and women with endometriosis. Age (years) median (min-max), BMI (kg/m2) median (min-max), serum steroid concentrations (median and 25th-75th centile range; nmol L–1). Values below the lower limit of quantification are indicated as < lower limit of quantification. Steroid concentrations 540 below the LLOQ were replaced by 0.5×LLOQ for statistical purposes. P value vs healthy control; * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, **** p<0.0001. a vs Stage I, b vs Stage II. CONTROLS ENDOMETRIOSIS All All Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV n 57 159 66 34 26 33 Age 30 (22-48) 32.00 (19-50) 28.00 (19-47) 36.00 a (22-46) 37.00 a (22-50) 34.00 a (23-47) BMI 22.04 (17.3-37.3) 25.00 (18.0-62.0) *** 25.00** (18.0 – 62.0) 25.25** (18.0 – 37.5) 25.00* (19.2 – 35.0) 25.65 (18.0 – 39.5) Cycle stage pro/sec/ND 19/22/16 33.3%/38.6%/28% 75/67/17 47.2%/42.1%/10.7% 32/30/4 48.5%/45.5%/6.1% 16/14/4 47.0%/41.2%/11.2% 17/9/0 65.4%/34.6%/0% 10/15/8 30.3%/45.5%/24.2% DHEA 9.6 (6.02-14.63) 20.80 (12.23-32.48) **** 25.40**** (16.35-39.45) 18.50*** (11.70-33.55) 14.65a (10.00-22.40) 19.40** (10.20-30.60) A4 2.83 (1.76-4.01) 4.72 (3.37-6.59) **** 5.55**** (3.71-7.51) 4.52*** (3.25-7.41) 4.56 (2.88-5.51) 4.61* (2.76-5.83) T 0.63 (0.50-0.93) 1.15 (0.86-1.49) **** 1.26**** (0.97-1.59) 1.25**** (1.00-1.80) 1.07*** (0.80-1.44) 1.03* b (0.69-1.33) DHT 0.17 (0.17-0.50) 0.40 (0.17-0.60) 0.48* (0.17-0.70) 0.44 (0.17-0.59) 0.26 (0.17-0.47) 0.36 (0.17-0.57) 11OHA4 7.26 (5.35-10.12) 5.67 (3.80-8.21) ** 6.27 (4.49-8.54) 6.34 (4.11-8.34) 5.38* (3.08-7.10) 5.18 (3.78-7.35) 11KA4 3.18 (2.28-3.75) 1.64 (1.11-2.39) **** 1.88**** (1.24-2.72) 1.63**** (1.07-2.32) 1.53**** (1.08-2.05) 1.42**** (0.97-2.28) 11OHT 0.36 (0.17-0.52) 0.51 (0.17-0.72) **** 0.57*** (0.36-0.73) 0.53* (0.31-0.68) 0.43 (0.17-0.67) 0.44 (0.25-0.71) 11KT 0.69 (0.44-0.97) 1.3 (0.99-1.80) **** 1.49**** (1.12-2.19) 1.25**** (0.96-1.80) 1.18*** (0.87-1.72) 1.15** (0.72-1.71) . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 23 Figure 1. Serum concentrations of classic androgens and 11-oxygenated androgens in healthy 545 controls (HC) or women with endometriosis (ENDO). Serum concentrations of DHEA, A4, T, and 11OHA4, 11KA4, 11OHT, and 11KT were by LC-MS/MS. DHEA, A4, T, were significantly elevated in ENDO compared to HC (A-C). Concentrations of DHT did not differ between groups (D). 11- oxygenated androgen precursors, 11OHA4 (E) and 11KA4 (F), were decreased in ENDO, while potent 11-oxygenated androgens, 11OHT (G) and 11KT (H) were significantly elevated in ENDO. ENDO 550 patients were stratified according to rASRM stage (I-P). DHEA and A4 were significantly elevated in Stage I, II and IV endometriosis (I, J). T was elevated in all endometriosis stages (K), and DHT was significantly elevated in Stage I endometriosis (L). Concentrations of 11OHA4 did not significantly differ between groups (M) while 11KA4 was decreased in all stages (N). In contrast, 11OHT was significantly elevated in Stage I endometriosis (O) while 11KT was elevated in all endometriosis 555 . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 24 stages (P). Median serum steroid concentrations (25th-75th centile range; nmol L–1) for each stage (I). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean. Dotted lines denote LLOQ for each analyte. Undetected steroids or those detected below LLOQ were replaced by 0.5×LLOQ for statistical purposes. Statistical comparison Mann Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test with multiple comparisons. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 ****p<0.0001, ns – non significant. 560 . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 25 Figure 2. Endometriosis is associated with altered androgen metabolism characterised by increased production of 11KT. A Pearson correlation matrix of key analytes in HC demonstrates strong 565 correlation between related steroids within relevant subgroupings including A4 and T, 11OHA4 and 11KA4 as well as 11KT and 11OHT. B In ENDO patients there was a strong correlation between both classic and 11-oxygenated androgen metabolites indicative of altered metabolism. Enzyme activity based on substrate to product ratios (product/substrate) were calculated based on measured serum . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 26 concentrations in healthy control women (HC) and patients diagnosed with endometriosis (ENDO). 570 The ratios required for sequential production of 11KT were assessed including CYP11B1 (C, D), HSD11B2 (E, F) and AKR1C3 (G, H). The ratios of 11OHA4/A4 (C), 11OHT/T (D) and 11KA4/OHA4 (E) were significantly decreased in ENDO compared to HC. In contrast, the ratios of 11KT/11OHT (F), 11OHT/11OHA4 (G), 11KT/11KA4 (H) were significantly increased in ENDO compared to HC. Collectively these metabolism changes are associate with increased production of 11KT (I). Statistical 575 comparison Mann Whitney U test. *p<0.05, ****p<0.0001. . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 27 Figure 3. Assessing the utility of androgen concentrations for discrimination between HC and ENDO. ROC curve analysis of serum analyte concentrations (A-C) and ratios (D-F) was assessed (G). Robust 580 discrimination between HC and ENDO was observed for single analytes; T (AUC 0.8152; p<0.001), 11KA4 (AUC 0.8145; p<0.001) and 11KT (AUC 0.8219; p<0.001), and for each ratio; 11OHA4/A4 (AUC 0.8556; p<0.001), 11OHT/11OHA4 (AUC 0.817; p<0.001), and 11KT/11KA4 (AUC 0.9676; p<0.001). Sensitibity, specificity and likelihood ratio were summarised and the ratio of 11KT/11KA4 provided the most robust discrimination between HC and ENDO (G). H Multiple logistic regression modelling 585 was used to fit a predictive model using androgen concentrations, Age and BMI as dependent variables and diagnosed endometriosis as the outcome variable. I ROC curve analysis of model demonstrated excellent discrimination between HC and ENDO with AUC of 0.99 (p<0.0001, CI 0.9794 . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 28 to 1.000). J The predictive power of the model was calculated based on observed vs predicted outcomes. The negative predictive power of the model was 92.86% and the positive predictive power 590 was 96.84%. Statistical comparison Mann Whitney U test. ****p<0.0001, ns – non significant. . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint 29 Figure 4. Actual performance of simplified predictive model for diagnostic status using androgen 595 concentrations. The whole data set was partitioned into train and validation groups. The training set contained dependent and outcome variables for HC (n=21) and ENDO (n=21) and the validation set contained dependent variables but was blinded to outcome variable (n=138). Multiple logistic regression was used to fit a refined predictive model using BMI, 11OHA4, 11KA4 and 11KT as dependent variables and diagnosed endometriosis as the outcome variable (A, B). Samples with 600 missing data were excluded as part of the regression analysis. C ROC curve analysis of the model demonstrated excellent discrimination between HC and ENDO with AUC of 0.965 (p<0.0001, CI 0.9124 to 1.000). The estimated negative predictive power of the model was 94.74% with a positive predictive power of 95.24%. (A, D). The actual performance of the model was assessed using the remaining data with outcome blinded (validation set). E The sensitivity for ENDO was 95.65% with 605 accurate prediction observed in all disease stage stratifications; including grouped Minimal/Mild (Stage I + II), Moderate/Severe (Stage III + IV) or by individual rASRM stage (I-IV). . CC-BY-NC 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 25, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.24.25328281doi: medRxiv preprint

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

EHP-30 rASRM

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (37)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-13T06:45:43.823035+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK