Gynecologic Surgical Outcomes Through the Patient's Eyes: Are Physicians Looking in the Same Direction?
Review
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This review identifies key outcomes important to women undergoing benign gynecologic surgery and provides guidance for surgeons to incorporate these patient preferences into shared decision-making for improved satisfaction.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Patient-centered care integrates the highest clinical standards with patient preferences surrounding their treatment. Increasing focus is being placed on the identification of patient-centered outcomes to optimize the impact of medical treatments on patient quality of life, as defined by patients themselves.
OBJECTIVE: This article will review the central concepts of patient-centered outcomes in benign gynecologic surgery. This expert review will serve as a practical guide for surgeons to incorporate patient preferences into shared surgical decision making.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The current literature is examined, defining those outcomes identified by women undergoing gynecologic procedures as the most important factors in their decision making. Available literature on these patient-identified priorities is then reviewed with respect to gynecologic surgery in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods.
RESULTS: Each section of the article concludes with Clinical Pearls, where practical tools and key elements are summarized to assist providers with incorporating these concepts into practice.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Many key outcomes have been identified by women undergoing benign gynecologic surgery in their decision-making process. Patient counseling should address clinically appropriate treatment modalities and include an exploration of patient expectations and preferences around nonclinical outcomes as well. This shared decision-making model will result in improved satisfaction with outcomes.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (4)
- Incidence and risk factors of chronic pain following hysterectomy among Southern Jiangsu Chinese Women 2017
- Risk factors for trachelectomy following supracervical hysterectomy 2017
- Cervix removal at the time of hysterectomy: factors affecting patients' choice and effect on subsequent sexual function 2015
- Duration of hospital stay after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery: preferences of patients 2013
References (61)
- Cervix removal at the time of hysterectomy: factors affecting patients' choice and effect on subsequent sexual function via openalex
- Duration of hospital stay after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery: preferences of patients via openalex
- Incidence and risk factors of chronic pain following hysterectomy among Southern Jiangsu Chinese Women via openalex
- Risk factors for trachelectomy following supracervical hysterectomy via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-017-4452-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1089/152460900318759 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01548.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000265161.39932.e8 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00205.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.10.001 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181ec5fc1 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181a11c64 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/jsm.12623 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.2014.11100 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/rcs.115 via openalex
- doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810209.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000001904 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09714.x via openalex
- doi:10.1055/s-0034-1388581 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/0272989x09353947 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.005 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3420-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.017 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.028 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57899-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3318-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.014 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80226-9 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/00016349.2010.516815 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/104365902236704 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00464-004-9043-2 via openalex
- W2310558768 via openalex
- W2366964105 via openalex
- W2427158015 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/aogs.13133 via openalex
- doi:10.2196/resprot.5881 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.175 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.004 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.004 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002061 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017781 via openalex
- W2937480954 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm198704303161801 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aco.0000000000000586 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00192-017-3442-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.009 via openalex
- doi:10.2105/ajph.2017.304265 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/grf.0b013e318218637d via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31829aa780 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2007.08.606 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.06.007 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.004 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.archger.2017.07.006 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e31823c1030 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3248-y via openalex
- doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12494 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31824bb15e via openalex
- doi:10.17294/2330-0698.1581 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/md.0000000000003980 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002344 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-13T19:46:01.794608+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:24:54.379125+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK