What is endometriosis? Patients turn to social media for information and support

preprint OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-10

Patients with endometriosis, facing historical mistreatment and diagnostic delays, increasingly turn to social media for information and support, often finding valuable resources despite potential misinformation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This paper discusses how people living with endometriosis seek information and support via social media, motivated by longstanding underfunding, misrepresentation, and perceived mistreatment in care. Drawing on a survey of 287 people with endometriosis, the author reports that 61.6% did not learn about the condition from health-care practitioners, while 81.6% said social media played a role in diagnosis or learning, and 92% learned something new online that they had not heard elsewhere. A key caveat is that the paper relies on survey-reported experiences and does not provide verification of information accuracy on platforms, while also noting that misinformation competes with accurate advocate content. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—specifically, patient use of social media for information and support in the context of delayed diagnosis and perceived dismissal.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (7)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK