Positron emission tomography in the evaluation of endometriosis: A systematic review

Rachael Fox, Chang S, Sarah Chang, Lauren Hicks, Hicks L, Samantha Mooney, Mooney S, Peter A. W. Rogers, Hicks RJ, Rodney J. Hicks, Tyson K, Kate Tyson, Sarah J Holdsworth-Carson, Sarah J. Holdsworth‐Carson
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2024 · vol. 299 , pp. 258–265 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.06.017 · PMID:38917749 · W4399566094
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-26 ⓘ

This systematic review found that 18F-FDG PET scanning inconsistently identifies endometriotic lesions, limiting its diagnostic utility, while the effectiveness of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT for endometriosis remains uncertain.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Despite the profound impact of endometriosis worldwide, delays in diagnosis and suboptimal surveillance techniques are well-recognised issues. Case studies have reported incidental uptake of 18F-FDG PET tracer in endometriotic lesions. However, the utility of PET imaging as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for endometriosis is currently unclear. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarise the existing evidence and determine the value of available PET scanning techniques in the detection and monitoring of endometriosis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched from conception to 05/03/23. Eligible studies included participants with a history of known or suspected endometriosis who underwent a PET scan for any indication. All PET tracers and protocols were eligible. Outcomes included correlation of PET tracer uptake with the presence of endometriosis seen at laparoscopy or confirmed on histology, sensitivity of tracer uptake, specificity of tracer uptake, site of lesions with tracer uptake, stage of lesions with tracer uptake, SUVmax of endometriosis lesions and adverse reactions to PET imaging. The protocol for this review was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023405260). Eight studies describing 110 participants were eligible for inclusion. Six studies assessed 18F-FDG with combined PET-CT, one study assessed 18F-FDG PET alone, and the remaining study assessed PET-CT with an alternative tracer, 68Ga-DOTATATE. For 18F-FDG imaging, the correlation of PET avidity with lesions or sites of endometriosis ranged from 0-55 %. Pre-operative 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT detected endometriosis in 33 % of cases. All included studies were cohort studies, six were assessed to have low risk of bias, one with moderate risk and one with high risk of bias. Overall, 18F-FDG PET scanning does not appear to consistently identify endometriotic lesions, and therefore its reliability and usefulness in endometriosis diagnosis is limited. The utility of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT remains uncertain. Findings are constrained by limited available evidence reporting outcomes of PET imaging for endometriosis. Other existing PET tracers with biological plausibility in the detection or monitoring of endometriosis warrant further investigation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (45)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-04T06:12:21.844092+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK