Comparison of degree of sexual dysfunction by using female sexual functional index-6 in the subfertile and other females presenting to tertiary care hospital
Subfertile females exhibited significantly lower sexual function scores than a control group, indicating a higher prevalence of sexual dysfunction in this population.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This cross-sectional prospective comparative study (Feb–July 2023) evaluated 276 sexually active Pakistani women aged 18–40 from a tertiary care hospital setting, comparing subfertile women with a non-subfertile group using a translated modified Female Sexual Functional Index Score limited to 6 items spanning desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The key finding was that sexual dysfunction scores differed significantly between groups, with lower mean scores in the subfertile group (17.53±2.98) versus controls (20.4±3.26; p<0.001), and a cutoff of <19 indicating sexual dysfunction; the paper also reported that women with endometriosis had a lower mean score (15.91±3.4) than those without. The authors additionally stated the translated modified tool showed validity with moderate reliability for assessing sexual dysfunction in this population. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper reports subgroup results in women with endometriosis (mean sexual dysfunction score 15.91±3.4), though the study’s main focus is comparison of sexual dysfunction between subfertile and other women and validation of the modified FSFI-6.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,306 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Objectives
Method
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-14T06:08:30.651965+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-07-14T06:04:40.048348+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine