Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound with laparoscopy in the management of patients with adnexal masses

In: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2009 · vol. 280(5) , pp. 767–773 · doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1001-8 · PMID:19263064 · W1974488898
article OA: hybrid CC0 ⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study found that laparoscopy has higher diagnostic accuracy than transvaginal ultrasound, particularly for endometriomas, and is a safe and accurate method for diagnosing and managing benign adnexal masses.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study was (a) to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound examination with laparoscopic findings and both with the gold standard (histology) in the management of benign ovarian lesions, and (b) to assess the feasibility of laparoscopy in their diagnosis and management. METHODS: Prospective, comparative study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). A total of 117 women 15-59 years old were examined at outpatient department and had transvaginal ultrasound assessment. Ninety-eight women (three postmenopausal) with 105 cystic ovarian lesions met inclusion criteria and underwent operative laparoscopy. Histology was performed in all cases. RESULTS: Although laparoscopy showed an overall higher performance compared to transvaginal ultrasound, statistically significant difference was found only in the detection of endometriomas compared to ultrasound (P = 0.004 for sensitivity and P = 0.046 for specificity). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy exhibits higher diagnostic accuracy, especially in endometriomas, compared to transvaginal scan. Laparoscopic diagnosis appears to be safe and accurate. Conservative laparoscopic management of benign adnexal masses is safe and with low morbidity.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Cited by (6)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK