Cas
Our search in the
CAS Content Collection for ART-related
documents retrieved over 50,000 scientific publications
(mostly journal articles and patents) for the period 2000–2024.
The number of related documents has consistently grown over the last
two decades, more than tripling in that time ( Figure
A). Reflecting the early success of in vitro fertilization, form the 1980 the number of ART-related
research has exhibited exponential growth ( Figure
A, inset). Figure
B summarizes the top patent offices with
the most ART-associated patents. The World Intellectual Property Organization
(WIPO) and the China patent office are notable leaders.
(A) Number
of documents (journal articles and patents) related
to ART in the CAS Content Collection for years 2000–2024. Inset:
Document yearly growth from year 1980, with an exponential growth
trendline. (B) Top patent offices with patents related to ART. (C)
Distribution of substances associated with ART in journal (outer donut
chart) and patent (inner pie chart) publications, broken down by substance
class. Data from the CAS Content Collection for the period 2000–2024.
We surveyed the substance data extracted from the
CAS REGISTRY regarding the types of substance
classes commonly
associated with ART. Our analysis indicates that proteins/peptides/nucleic
acids and small molecules are most commonly associated with ART ( Figure
C). In patents, proteins/peptides/nucleic
acids represent ∼60%, and in journals, ∼86% of publications.
Small molecules are the second largest group, with 12% in journals
and ∼40% in patents ( Figure
C).
Indeed, proteins, peptides, and nucleic acids
play crucial roles
in advancing ART. Their applications are expanding with the development
of emerging biotechnological innovations. Exemplary specific roles
of proteins, peptides, and nucleic acids in the emerging ART are described
below:
(i) Growth factors and cytokines: proteins
like bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP), insulin-like growth factor
(IGF), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) improve oocyte maturation,
sperm motility, and embryo development in culture media;
,
antiapoptotic proteins (e.g., BCL-2) enhance embryo survival.
,
(ii) Hormones and receptors: follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH),
luteinizing hormone (LH), and hCG are used for ovarian stimulation
in IVF;
,
zona pellucida proteins (ZP1–4) are
critical for sperm-egg binding and fertilization;
,
albumin and serum proteins are used in culture media to stabilize
embryos and prevent oxidative stress.
−
(i) Synthetic peptides for sperm activation:
CatSper channel-activating peptides can enhance sperm motility for
ICSI. (ii) Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)
are used to prevent bacterial contamination in semen extenders and
embryo culture media.
,
(iii) Cell-penetrating peptides
(CPPs) deliver gene-editing tools (CRISPR-Cas9) or protective molecules
(e.g., antioxidants) into gametes/embryos.
,
DNA/RNA analysis for genetic screening:
(i) Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-A/PGT-M) using PCR and NGS
to screen embryos for aneuploidy or genetic disorders. Sperm RNA profiling
helps identify male infertility biomarkers. (ii) Gene editing (CRISPR-Cas9)
corrects mutations in embryos (e.g., mitochondrial DNA diseases);
potential use in synthetic embryos or gametes from stem cells. (iii)
Noncoding RNAs (miRNAs, lncRNAs): miRNAs regulate oocyte maturation
and embryo implantation; exosomal RNAs in seminal fluid influence
embryo development.
−
(i) Synthetic proteins/peptides: Custom-designed
molecules to improve gamete quality and embryo viability. (ii) Nucleic
acid therapeutics: mRNA-based treatments to enhance endometrial receptivity.
(iii) Exosome-based therapies: using extracellular vesicles carrying
proteins/nucleic acids to improve reproductive outcomes. Proteins,
peptides, and nucleic acids are revolutionizing ART by enhancing the
fertilization efficiency, embryo quality, and genetic safety. Future
advances may include personalized reproductive medicine using these
biomolecules.
Small molecules are the second largest
group of substances represented in the ART-related documents, with
12% in journals and ∼40% in patents. They play several critical
roles in the emerging trends of ART, enhancing efficiency, safety,
and success rates. Small molecules (typically <900 Da) are revolutionizing
ART by improving gamete quality, embryo viability, and implantation
success while enabling cutting-edge techniques like IVG, stem cell-based
reproduction, and personalized fertility treatments.
−
Their role will expand further with advances in precision reproductive
medicine. Table
summarizes
the roles of small molecules in emerging ART.
Thus, key trends enabled by small molecules include:
(i) precision
fertilitytargeted modulation of gamete/embryo quality; (ii)
stem cell-based reproductionlab-generated gametes (IVG); (iii)
reduced hormonal dependencesafer stimulation protocols; (iv)
epigenetic safetymitigating ART-induced epigenetic risks;
(v) cryopreservation advanceshigher post-thaw survival rates.
Polymers, represented by ∼1% in both
patents and journal articles related to the field, also play roles
in ART by improving biocompatibility, structural support, drug delivery,
and cryopreservation. Their versatility enables advances in embryo
culture, gamete storage, bioengineered reproductive tissues, and minimally
invasive procedures.
−
For example, polymers like hyaluronic acid and PEG
improve biocompatibility by reducing immune rejection; alginates and
collagen provide mechanical support by mimicking ECM for 3D culture;
PLGA and chitosan nanoparticles provide controlled release for slow
hormone/drug delivery; PVA and trehalose polymers play a role in cryoprotection,
preventing freeze damage; fibrin and poloxamer gels play a role in
bioadhesion, improving embryo transfer success,
Animal
The development and optimization of assisted reproductive technologies
rely heavily on animal models, which offer valuable insights into
reproductive biology and the effects of various ART interventions.
Animal models are indispensable in ART research due to their biological
and physiological similarities to humans and their role in studying
species-specific reproductive processes. Moreover, animal models provide
a controlled environment to study the mechanisms of reproduction,
test new technologies, and assess the safety and efficacy of ART interventions.
Thus, animals enable repeated experiments, ensuring consistent data
collection; animal research minimizes direct experimentation on humans
in the initial stages of ART development; certain animal species closely
resemble human reproductive physiology, making them ideal for translational
research; and models help optimize ART for wildlife and livestock
with unique reproductive traits. Furthermore, animal models allow
for iterative refinement of techniques, provide insights into developmental
biology and long-term effects, and enable high throughput testing
of interventions.
−
The development and application of
ART in humans and model animals
follow parallel tracks, with most techniques undergoing extensive
testing in animals before being adapted for human use.
Common
animal models in ART research include: (i) rodents (mice
and rats)due to their short reproductive cycles, ease of genetic
manipulation, and low cost; (ii) livestock (cattle, sheep, and goats)contributing
to both agricultural efficiency and wildlife conservation by adapting
techniques for endangered species; (iii) nonhuman primatesthe
closest models to humans in reproductive biology; (iv) zebrafisha
unique model for early embryogenesis due to their external fertilization
and transparent embryos; and (v) wildlife modelssupporting
global conservation efforts by enhancing genetic diversity and population
recovery. Techniques applied to animal models vs humans are compared
in Table
.
IVF, in vitro fertilization;
ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVG, in vitro gametogenesis.
Animal models remain indispensable in ART research,
serving as
a bridge to ensure that human applications are safe and effective.
Certain key assisted reproductive technologies applied in animals
are summarized in the Supporting Information .
Recent
Recent advancements in ART
are transforming fertility treatments,
providing more options, and improving success rates.
Artificial Intelligence
(AI) is increasingly being integrated into ART to enhance efficiency,
precision, and outcomes.
−
It has been successfully utilized in several areas.
For embryo selection , AI algorithms analyze embryo images to assess
their quality and potential for successful implantation.
,
These algorithms use: (i) time-lapse imaging: AI monitors embryo
development over time, evaluating factors such as morphology, cell
division patterns, and dynamics; (ii) morphokinetic data: algorithms
predict the likelihood of an embryo developing into a viable pregnancy
by identifying subtle features not visible to the human eye. AI also
helps improve sperm selection by (i) sperm motility analysis,
identifying the most motile and morphologically normal sperm; (ii)
DNA integrity checks, assessing DNA fragmentation levels in sperm
to select the healthiest candidates.
,
Machine
learning models analyze multiple data points to predict
the success rate of IVF , including patient history (age, hormonal
levels, lifestyle factors), clinical data (ovarian reserve markers,
endometrial receptivity), and embryo quality metrics. AI can optimize ovarian stimulation protocols by personalizing medication
dosages based on patient-specific responses, and predicting ovarian
response to stimulation, reducing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation
syndrome (OHSS).
AI-driven automation streamlines processes in ART
laboratories, including monitoring and controlling incubator conditions,
standardizing embryo grading to minimize human error, and managing
cryopreservation protocols.
,
AI leverages large data sets from clinics and research studies to identify
trends and factors influencing ART success and improve treatment protocols
by recognizing patterns in patient and embryo data.
AI is playing a transformative role in reducing
costs in artificial reproduction techniques (ART), addressing
one of the
biggest barriers to accessibility. The major way for reducing costs
is via AI-driven efficiency : Smarter embryo selection (biggest cost-saver): Time-lapse
imaging + deep learning (e.g., EmbryoScope, LifeWhisperer
−
) predicts embryo viability with >90% accuracy, reducing failed
transfers.
Cost impact: fewer IVF cycles needed per live birth. Optimized ovarian stimulation: Algorithms (e.g., IVF2.0,
Alife) personalize drug doses based on patient data (AMH, BMI, age),
minimizing wasted medications.
,
Cost impact: reduces
medication costs. Automated sperm analysis:
Tools like YO Sperm Analyzer
or MobileHome
−
provide instant, accurate sperm motility/morphology
readings. Cost impact: cuts lab fees for basic diagnostics.
Smarter embryo selection (biggest cost-saver): Time-lapse
imaging + deep learning (e.g., EmbryoScope, LifeWhisperer
−
) predicts embryo viability with >90% accuracy, reducing failed
transfers.
Cost impact: fewer IVF cycles needed per live birth.
Optimized ovarian stimulation: Algorithms (e.g., IVF2.0,
Alife) personalize drug doses based on patient data (AMH, BMI, age),
minimizing wasted medications.
,
Cost impact: reduces
medication costs.
Automated sperm analysis:
Tools like YO Sperm Analyzer
or MobileHome
−
provide instant, accurate sperm motility/morphology
readings. Cost impact: cuts lab fees for basic diagnostics.
Lowering emotional and physical burden (indirect
cost
savings): (i) AI’s improved embryo/sperm selection reduces
psychological toll and financial strain from multiple IVF attempts;
(ii) AI models (e.g., Fairtility’s CHLOE ) predict optimal protocols per patient, avoiding costly
trial-and-error approaches.
While not yet universal, AI adoption
in fertility clinics is making
treatments more affordable and efficient. In the near future, AI could
democratize access to ART by slashing costs by 30–50% for many
patients.
IVG represents a groundbreaking
advancement in the field of ART offering new possibilities for addressing
infertility, understanding human reproduction, and exploring genetic
disorders.
−
IVG is an experimental technology that enables the creation of sperm
or eggs from somatic cells such as skin or blood cells. IVG involves
the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), such as embryonic
stem cells (ESCs) or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), into
gametes. This process mimics the natural progression of gametogenesis,
where primordial germ cells develop into mature gametes through intricate
molecular and cellular pathways. Researchers have successfully produced
functional gametes in animal models such as mice, leading to healthy
offspring. In 2024, scientists at Kyoto University created precursors
to human gametes from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).
While IVG has been successfully demonstrated
in animal models, translating these techniques to human systems remains
a work in progress due to the complexity of human gametogenesis and
important ethical concerns. Potential uses of IVG include: providing
gametes for individuals unable to produce viable eggs or sperm; enabling
same-sex couples to have genetically related children; and addressing
infertility due to age or medical conditions. IVG can be used to study
early embryonic development and genetic diseases in controlled environments.
There are ethical concerns regarding embryo creation and manipulationit
might lead to ethical dilemmas about creating and discarding large
numbers of embryos, etc.
,
Safety and efficacy
need extensive validation before clinical application. One of the
primary safety concern regarding germline editing is the lack of sufficient
data on long-term consequences and potential off-target effects. There is a growing emphasis on involving the
public in discussions about the ethical, legal, and social implications
of genetic material editing.
Stem cell-based therapies
have emerged as a promising avenue in ART, leveraging the regenerative
and differentiation potential of stem cells to enhance reproductive
outcomes. It is paving the way for advanced reproductive treatments.
−
The application of stem cell-based therapies in ART relies on their
ability to (i) differentiate into reproductive cell typesfor
example, inducing embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem
cells to form oocytes or sperm; (ii) secrete growth factorsstem
cells release paracrine signals that enhance tissue repair and cellular
function; (iii) integrate into host tissuestransplanted stem
cells can integrate into reproductive tissues, contributing to structural
and functional recovery.
In the context of ART, stem cells hold
potential in several key areas:
Age-related decline in the ovarian
reserve is a major cause of
infertility. Mesenchymal stem cells and bone marrow-derived stem cells
have shown promise in regenerating ovarian tissue , improving
folliculogenesis, and restoring hormonal balance.
,
Stem cell transplantation has demonstrated potential in restoring
spermatogenesis in individuals with azoospermia or other forms
of male infertility. Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) can be harvested,
cultured, and reintroduced into the testes to reinitiate sperm production.
,
Conditions such as Asherman’s syndrome and thin endometrium
pose significant challenges for successful implantation.
,
Endometrial stem cells (ESCs) and MSCs have been explored to regenerate and enhance endometrial receptivity .
,
Advanced research has focused on deriving gametes (eggs and
sperm)
from pluripotent stem cells.
In vitro gametogenesis
(IVG) represents a potential breakthrough for individuals with
nonfunctional or absent gametes, offering a new route to biological
parenthood.
Various stem cell types used in ART are exemplified In Table
.
One of the most significant
trends in ART is the integration of advanced genetic screening techniques.
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has become increasingly sophisticated,
allowing for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities and single-gene
disorders in embryos before implantation.
,
PGT-A (aneuploidy screening) technique screens for chromosomal
abnormalities, which are a leading cause of implantation failure and
miscarriage. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have improved
the accuracy and efficiency of PGT-A, leading to higher success rates
in IVF cycles.
,
PGT-M (monogenic disorder) is used to identify embryos
carrying specific genetic mutations, enabling couples with hereditary
conditions to have healthy offspring. The development of CRISPR-Cas9
and other gene-editing tools has further enhanced the potential for
correcting genetic defects at the embryonic stage.
,
PGT-SR (structural rearrangements)
form of testing is
designed for individuals with chromosomal translocations or inversions,
helping to identify embryos with balanced chromosomal structures.
,
PGT-A (aneuploidy screening) technique screens for chromosomal
abnormalities, which are a leading cause of implantation failure and
miscarriage. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have improved
the accuracy and efficiency of PGT-A, leading to higher success rates
in IVF cycles.
,
PGT-M (monogenic disorder) is used to identify embryos
carrying specific genetic mutations, enabling couples with hereditary
conditions to have healthy offspring. The development of CRISPR-Cas9
and other gene-editing tools has further enhanced the potential for
correcting genetic defects at the embryonic stage.
,
PGT-SR (structural rearrangements)
form of testing is
designed for individuals with chromosomal translocations or inversions,
helping to identify embryos with balanced chromosomal structures.
,
These advancements not only improve the likelihood of
a successful pregnancy but also reduce the risk of passing on genetic
disorders, offering a more personalized approach to reproductive medicine.
With advancements in genetic technologies,
particularly gene editing, the landscape of ART is evolving to address
not only infertility but also the prevention of genetic diseases.
Gene editing in ART holds the promise of reducing heritable disorders,
improving embryo selection, and enhancing reproductive success rates.
It allows the precise editing of genes in embryos, eggs, or sperm.
The CRISPR-Cas9 system is the most prominent tool in gene editing, enabling precise modifications in the genome.
By targeting specific DNA sequences, CRISPR-Cas9 can add, delete,
or alter genes, making it a valuable technology in addressing inherited
genetic disorders in embryos created via in vitro fertilization (IVF).
,
Gene editing
can correct mutations in embryos associated with hereditary diseases
such as cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anemia, and Huntington’s
disease, preventing their transmission to future generations. Another
line of application of gene editing in ART is for enhancement of embryo
selectiongenetic screening combined with editing can improve
embryo quality by selecting embryos with the highest potential for
successful implantation and development. Gene editing can help also addressing infertility it may help identify and correct
genetic causes of infertility, such as chromosomal abnormalities or
mutations affecting gamete function.
The technique is controversial
due to the potential for “designer
babies” and unintended consequences. Moreover, editing one
gene could have unforeseen effects on other genes or biological processes,
potentially causing harm. Currently gene editing is banned for reproductive
purposes in many countries. Research
is ongoing, but clinical use for reproductive purposes remains highly
regulated. One of the major safety concern regarding gene editing
is the lack of sufficient data on long-term consequences and possible
off-target effects. Unintended mutations
could have serious consequences for individuals and future generations
making it crucial to fully understand the potential long-term effects
before clinical application.
,
Even highly precise
gene editing tools like CRISPR can sometimes make edits at unintended
locations in the genome (“off-target effects”), which
could lead to unforeseen health complications.
,
Regulatory agencies are increasingly engaging with the scientific
community to establish frameworks for the safe and ethical use of
gene-editing technologies. There is a rising urgency to involve the
public in debates regarding the ethical, legal, and social implications
of gene editing.
Mitochondrial replacement
therapy (MRT), also known as mitochondrial donation, is a technique
that aims to prevent the transmission of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)
disorders from mother to child.
−
This involves replacing defective
mitochondria in an egg or embryo with healthy mitochondria from a
donor, preventing mitochondrial diseases in offspring. Thus, MRT has
been used to create embryos with genetic material from three individuals:
the mother, the father, and a mitochondrial donor (so-called “three-parent
babies”). MRT raises ethical
concerns related to genetic modification and its long-term effects
on future generations. MRT is particularly beneficial for women with
mitochondrial disorders who wish to have genetically related children.
The technology is currently regulated differently across countries,
with some permitting its use under strict guidelines and others banning
it outright.
Gene editing and
MRT technologies are compared in Table
.
PNT, pronuclear transfer; MST, maternal
spindle transfer; PBT, polar body transfer.
Intracytoplasmic sperm
injection (ICSI) is an ART procedure that involves injecting live
sperm directly into the cytoplasm of a mature egg using a micromanipulation
tool. The fertilized egg is then cultured and transferred as in IVF
It represents a refinement of IVF and is the most common and successful
treatment for male infertility caused by sperm issues, such as low
sperm count, poor motility, or abnormal morphology, or when previous
IVF attempts have failed. Success rates are similar to IVF, but ICSI
can significantly improve fertilization rates in cases of male infertility.
There are many ways
to improve embryo culture systems in ART. These include new culture
platform design creating a better microenvironment for embryos, new
media formulations including antioxidants to reduce oxidative damage
and improve blastocyst development, and perfusion-based systems using
dynamic media flow instead of static culture. Advances in time-lapse
imaging and monitoring,
,
and optimized culture
media allow continuous monitoring of
embryo development, enabling better selection for transfer and increasing
implantation rates.
Next-generation sequencing
(NGS) is a genomic testing technology that is used in ART to screen
embryos for genetic defects. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)
using NGS helps to identify genetic abnormalities in embryos. It can
identify euploidy, aneuploidy, and chromosomal mosaicism. Using PGT enhances the likelihood of healthy
pregnancies while minimizing the risk of genetic disorders.
,
Cryopreservation techniques
in ART have improved in several ways, including vitrificationa
rapid freezing process that prevents ice crystal formation, improving
survival rates of frozen gametes and embryos, coupled with improved
and optimized cryoprotectants, vapor tanks storing tissue in the vapor
phase of nitrogen instead of immersing it in liquid nitrogen, offering
better survival rates for frozen eggs, sperm, and embryos, increasing
ART success rates.
, ,
Techniques such
as ovarian tissue cryopreservation and artificial ovary development
are advancing, benefiting individuals facing fertility-affecting medical
treatments. Ovarian rejuvenation technique is used to stimulate the
ovaries to produce new eggs, particularly in women with diminished
ovarian reserve or premature ovarian failure. It may include injecting
platelet-rich plasma (PRP) into the ovaries to stimulate tissue repair
and egg production or stem cells to regenerate ovarian tissue. The
technique is still experimental, with mixed results in early studies.
−
(i) Time-lapse
imagingcontinuous monitoring of embryos without the need for
manual handling improves embryo selection and reduces stress on the
embryos; (ii) Automated IVF systemsrobotics and automation
are being integrated into laboratories to improve the efficiency and
consistency of processes like fertilization and embryo transfer; (iii)
Noninvasive genetic testingtechniques to assess the genetic
health of embryos using culture media, rather than invasive biopsy,
are being developed to minimize risks.
, ,
Research into ectogenesis, or artificial
womb technology, aims to support the development of embryos outside
the human body. Such technology is providing solutions for individuals
unable to carry pregnancies due to medical or anatomical reasons,
and advancing neonatal care by supporting extremely premature infants.
,
Certain
It is worth noting that ART is a rapidly advancing field, but the
application of certain novel and emerging technologies in humans is
still highly experimental, tightly regulated, and surrounded by ethical
and legal challenges. We further overview the current status of animal
models related to ART. Certain key assisted reproductive technologies
applied in animals are summarized in the Supporting Information .
Notable
ART-related patents in the CAS
Content Collection grow not only
in numbers but also in formulation and methodology diversity. Summarized
in Table
are notable
recent patents related to ART, illustrating their diversity.
Assisted
Efforts to overcome infertility have a long history, from the first
documented case of artificial insemination in 1790 by John Hunter
in England, through the discovery of
the hormonal control of ovulation that laid the groundwork for ovarian
stimulation in ART, and the introduction
of cryopreservation techniques for sperm in the 1950s, further with the development of in vitro techniques to study fertilization in mammals,
,
as well as the research on ovarian stimulation and egg retrieval in the 1960s. The first pregnancy achieved through in vitro human fertilization of a human oocyte was reported
in 1973 although it ended in miscarriage. It was not until 1978 that the first successful IVF pregnancy and
live birth occurred,
,
with the IVF becoming mainstream
in the 1980s.
,
Currently, the traditional
methods of ART involve established and
widely used techniques that have formed the foundation of infertility
treatments ( Figure
). These methods primarily focus on the manipulation of eggs, sperm,
and embryos to enhance the chances of conception.
Traditional ART methods
(inner blue-green circle) and recent advancements
(outer yellow-orange circle).
In vitro fertilization (IVF) is the most well-known ART
procedure. It involves a process of fertilization, in which an egg
is combined with sperm in vitro . IVF includes the
steps of ovarian stimulation using fertility drugs to produce multiple
eggs, retrieval of mature eggs through a minor surgical procedure,
fertilization of eggs with sperm in a laboratory dish, and transfer
of resulting embryos into the uterus. Currently fully integrated into
clinical practice, it is successfully applied in tubal factor infertility,
endometriosis, male factor infertility, and unexplained infertility.
IVF is now a cornerstone of human fertility treatment, enabling millions
of births worldwide. Success rates vary by age, with the highest success
rates (30–40% per cycle) for women under 35. Rates decline
significantly after age 40.
−
Artificial insemination is
a medical procedure in which sperm is introduced into a woman’s
reproductive tract to facilitate fertilization and pregnancy. A sperm
sample is collected, washed, and concentrated to isolate healthy sperm
and then placed directly into the uterus (intrauterine insemination,
IUI) or cervix (intracervical insemination, ICI) during ovulation.
It is mainly applied in cases of mild male infertility, unexplained
infertility, and cervical mucus issues. It is simpler and less invasive
than IVF. Success rates are typically 10–20% per cycle, depending
on factors like age and sperm quality.
,
Gamete intrafallopian
transfer (GIFT) is a procedure that helps women conceive by placing
eggs and sperm directly into the fallopian tubes. Eggs and sperm are
collected and mixed before being placed into the fallopian tube via
laparoscopy, allowing fertilization to occur naturally in the body.
Used when one fallopian tube is functioning and there are no significant
sperm issues. Requires a surgical procedure and general anesthesia.
In contrast to IVF, which places fertilized eggs directly into the
uterus, the GIFT technique allowed the eggs to fertilize and develop
in the fallopian tube and then find their way to the uterus for implantation.
It is less commonly used today due to advances in IVF.
−
Zygote intrafallopian
transfer (ZIFT) is similar to IVF, but the fertilized egg (zygote)
is transferred into the fallopian tube instead of into the uterus.
It is applied for patients with infertility but healthy fallopian
tubes. Allows the zygote to develop in the natural environment of
the fallopian tube. Combines the benefits of IVF and GIFT, but is
less common now.
,
Cryopreservation
(fertility preservation) involves freezing and storing reproductive
cells, such as eggs, sperm, and embryos, for future use. Cryopreservation
is now a routine procedure for embryos and sperm, and is becoming
more common for oocytes. It is applied for fertility preservation,
e.g., for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation, with
excess embryos from IVF, or delaying childbearing for personal or
professional reasons. Vitrification (rapid freezing) has significantly
improved outcomes compared to slow freezing. Success rates depend
on the age at which eggs or sperm are frozen. Long-term storage costs
can be significant.
−
Egg donation and sperm
donation can help people have children when they are not able to produce
healthy eggs or sperm on their own. Eggs or sperm are donated by a
third party and used in ART procedures such as IVF or intrauterine
insemination to achieve pregnancy. Applied for individuals unable
to produce viable gametes, such as women with premature ovarian failure
or poor egg quality or men with no viable sperm. Widely used by older
women, same-sex couples, and single parents. Donors are screened for
medical and genetic conditions. Legal and ethical issues around donor
anonymity and parental rights vary by country.
,
Surrogacy involves a woman carrying and giving
birth to a child for another person or couple using their embryos
(gestational surrogacy) or their own egg (traditional surrogacy).
While in traditional surrogacy the surrogate’s egg is fertilized
with sperm (via IUI or IVF), making her the biological mother, in
gestational surrogacy the surrogate carries an embryo created through
IVF using the intended parents’ or donors’ eggs and
sperm, so she has no genetic link to the child. Applied for individuals
with uterine issues or medical conditions preventing pregnancy, also
for same-sex male couples or single men. Surrogacy laws vary widely
by country and region.
,
Advantages of the traditional
ART methods described above include: (i) proven track record including
decades of successful use and refinement; (ii) customizationcan
be tailored to specific infertility causes; (iii) wide availability,
offered by most fertility clinics worldwide. Traditional ART methods
remain the backbone of modern infertility treatment, with ongoing
advancements improving success rates and patient experiences. Still,
traditional ART methods, while groundbreaking and beneficial for many,
do have some shortcomings such as high costs, emotional and physical
stress, lower success rates with age, risk of multiple births, and
health risks including ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome as well as
certain ethical and legal Issues. Recent advancements in ART are actively
addressing these key shortcomings, directly tackling the cost, emotional
strain, and physical demands of traditional methods. While challenges
remain, innovations like AI, simplified protocols, and gentler procedures
are making fertility treatments more efficient and patient-centric.
For example, automation and AI in IVF laboratories, including AI-driven
embryo selection (e.g., time-lapse imaging and machine learning) reduces
failed cycles by picking the best-quality embryos, cutting repeat
IVF costs; robotic ICSI improves precision, lowering lab costs over
time. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for PGT is now faster and more
affordable, reducing the costs of failed implantations due to chromosomal
abnormalities. PGT-A (preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy)
improves live birth rates per transfer, reducing the emotional toll
from repeated failures. Endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) ensures
that embryos are transferred at the optimal time. Oral ovulation stimulants
(e.g., Letrozole, Clomiphene) are replacing some injectables, thus
reducing physical burden. Also, long-acting FSH analogs (e.g., Corifollitropin
alfa) require fewer injections.
Insights
We
examined the assortment of ART-associated concepts in the published
documents (journal articles and patents) in the CAS Content Collection
( Figure
).
Key concepts
related to assisted reproductive technologies in CAS
Content Collection with respective numbers of documents for the period
2000–2024.
Traditional technologies such
as in vitro
fertilization and embryo transfer , providing major advantages such as proven
track record, including successful customization, as well as wide
availability, understandably constitute the largest part of ART-related
documents in CAS Content Collection ( Figure
).
Figure
illustrates the
recent growth (years 2022–2024) and the patent/journal proportions
for some of the major ART-related concepts.
Relative growth of documents
associated with the key concepts related
to ART in CAS Content Collection over the past 3 years (2022–2024)
(top panel stacked bars) and relative proportions of journal articles
and patents (bottom row pie charts).
As seen in Figure
, artificial intelligence
and in vitro gametogenesis are the fastest growing
novel methods in ART in the last three years (2022–2024).
AI is being used to enhance embryo selection and optimize culture
conditions, leading to improved success rates. Machine learning helps
identify patterns in embryo development and patient responses, enabling
personalized treatment plans. Indeed, notable improvements were observed
in the accuracy of diagnosing and predicting successful outcomes in
fertility treatments. AI-driven models provided more precise forecasts
of the optimal timing for clinical interventions such as egg retrieval
and embryo transfer, which are critical to the success of ART cycles.
−
, , , ,
In vitro gametogenesis offers several potential
advantages, including: enabling reproduction for individuals with
impaired fertility due to lack of functional sperm or eggs, allowing
same-sex couples to have genetically related offspring, providing
greater control over genetic selection through embryo screening, and
potentially reducing the physical burden on women by eliminating the
need for ovarian stimulation during egg retrieval; however, this technology
is still in early stages and raises ethical concerns regarding genetic
manipulation and potential misuse.
,
IVG has shown
promise in animal models, including creating offspring with biological
contributions from same-sex parents. While not yet ready for clinical
use, it could revolutionize infertility treatments in the future.
Other methods exhibiting substantial growth in the last three years
include mitochondrial replacement and stem cells
therapies ( Figure
). The relative number of documents associated with gene editing methods also increased ( Figure
).
As seen from Figure
, bottom row, gene editing and stem-cell-based therapies are the
methods with highest patent fraction (13% and 10%, respectively) of
all documents, which is indicative for high market interest.
Stem cell-based therapies in ART offer potential advantages like
improving ovarian reserve function, stimulating follicle development,
repairing damaged reproductive tissues, and potentially generating
new germ cells, potentially providing hope for individuals struggling
with infertility due to conditions like premature ovarian failure
or low sperm count by leveraging the unique ability of stem cells
to proliferate and differentiate into specialized cell types. They
represent a cutting-edge approach to address infertility and enhance
reproductive health. These therapies leverage the regenerative potential
of stem cells to create gametes, repair reproductive tissues, and
improve ART outcomes.
,
Gene therapies in ART
offer the potential to prevent genetic diseases
in future generations by allowing for the identification and correction
of genetic mutations in embryos, potentially leading to healthier
babies with a reduced risk of inheriting genetic disorders while also
providing more options for couples facing infertility due to genetic
issues; however, ethical concerns and the need for further research
remain significant challenges. Although in its early stages, gene
editing is being explored to address infertility caused by genetic
mutations. This could also potentially correct genetic issues in embryos
before implantation.
,
Currently, gene editing
in humans, particularly germline editing
(which affects eggs, sperm, or embryos and can be passed on to future
generations), is heavily restricted or banned in many countries due
to ethical, safety, and societal concerns. Indeed, changes made to
germline cells are heritable, meaning that they affect future generations.
This raises ethical questions about consent, as future generations
cannot consent to these modifications.
, −
There are fears that gene editing could be used for nontherapeutic
enhancements (e.g., selecting for intelligence, appearance, or athletic
ability), leading to societal inequality and eugenics-like practices.
,
Also, some groups argue that altering human DNA is “playing
God” or interferes with natural processes. There are also safety
concerns that current gene-editing technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9,
are not 100% precise and can cause unintended mutations, which could
lead to cancer or other health issues. Editing one gene could have
unforeseen effects on other genes or biological processes, potentially
causing harm. Furthermore, there is no global agreement on how gene
editing should be regulated, leading to a patchwork of laws and guidelines.
Access to gene-editing technologies could exacerbate existing inequalities,
with only wealthy individuals or countries benefiting.
The ban
on germline editing in humans remains largely in place
globally, with most countries prioritizing caution and ethical considerations.
However, the rapid pace of technological advancement and the potential
for misuse have highlighted the need for stronger international cooperation
and oversight. While somatic cell editing continues to advance and
show promise for treating diseases, the debate over germline editing
is far from settled with ongoing discussions about its ethical, social,
and scientific implications.
Challenges
While ART hold
immense promise, they come with certain challenges
and ethical concerns.
,
Ensuring the health of both
parents and their offspring is paramount. Therefore, safety and efficacy
need extensive validation before clinical application.
, , , −
Creation and disposal of embryos: Creating more embryos than needed
raises concerns about what happens to unused embryos. Some view the
disposal of embryos as ethically problematic, particularly in cultures
or religions that ascribe moral status to embryos. The Vatican’s
Donum Vitae (1987) and Dignitas Personae (2008) declare embryo destruction
morally equivalent to abortion, as life begins at conception.
,
Furthermore, many conservative Protestant and Islamic scholars equate
embryo disposal with “taking a life”, citing Qur’anic
versus (e.g., Surah Al-An’am 6:151) and biblical texts (e.g.,
Jeremiah 1:5). Moreover, certain philosophers
argue embryos are “persons” with moral rights.
,
“Sanctity of Life” vs “Quality of Life”:
The former views embryos as inviolable; the latter prioritizes parental
autonomy and medical utility.
Other embryo-related ethics issue include also: (i) Embryo selection:
preimplantation genetic testing allows the selection of embryos free
from genetic disorders but raises concerns about eugenics and the
potential for “designer babies”; (ii) Cryopreservation:
Long-term storage raises questions about legal ownership and ethical
obligations to unused embryos; (iii) Embryonic research: The use of
embryos in stem cell research is controversial, with some arguing
it violates the sanctity of life.
−
There are certain issues related
to parentage and identity concerns: (i) Third-party involvement: Use
of donors (egg, sperm) and surrogates introduces legal and emotional
complexities regarding parental rights and the child’s right
to know their genetic origins; (ii) Posthumous reproduction: Using
gametes or embryos from deceased individuals raises questions about
consent and the welfare of the resulting child; (iii) Legal parenthood:
Surrogacy and gamete donation complicate legal definitions of parenthood,
leading to custody disputes; (iv) Donor anonymity vs right to know:
Should children conceived via donor gametes have access to their biological
parents? (v) Psychological effects: Children born via ART may experience
identity struggles if their biological and social parents differ;
(vi) Same-sex couples and single parents: Societal biases and legal
hurdles may affect the access of same-sex couples or single individuals
to ART.
, −
Ethical issues related
to genetic engineering include: (i) Gene editing: Technologies like
CRISPR used in ART raise concerns about unintended consequences, heritable
changes, and societal implications of altering human genetics; (ii)
Artificial gametes and wombs: The creation of gametes from stem cells
and the development of artificial wombs challenge traditional views
of reproduction and may blur ethical boundaries; (iii) Germline editing:
CRISPR-Cas9 allows heritable genetic modifications, raising fears
of eugenics and unintended consequences; (iv) Nonmedical enhancements:
Ethical concerns arise if gene editing is used for cosmetic traits
(e.g., height, intelligence) rather than disease prevention; (v) Regulation
and oversight: How should society balance scientific progress with
ethical boundaries?
, −
There are serious
ethical issues related to commercialization and exploitation of ART:
(i) Commodification of reproduction: ART commercialization may lead
to exploitation, particularly of egg donors and surrogates, in countries
with less regulatory oversight; (ii) Gender and economic inequalities:
ART can reinforce inequalities, as wealthier individuals have greater
access to advanced treatments; (iii) Population dynamics: Widespread
use of ART could influence societal norms regarding family size, age
of parenting, and population demographics; (iv) Egg and sperm donation:
Financial incentives may exploit economically vulnerable donors; (v)
Baby markets: Critics argue that commercializing reproduction commodifies
human life; (vi) Global surrogacy industry: Unregulated markets in
developing countries raise concerns about coercion and unfair compensation.
−
Legal and regulatory issues
are another aspect of ethics-related problems in ART: (i) Lack of
standardized regulations: ART practices and laws vary widely across
countries, leading to ethical inconsistencies; (ii) Cross-border reproductive
care (reproductive tourism): People traveling to countries with more
lenient ART laws may exploit loopholes, complicating ethical oversight
and enforcement; (iii) Privacy and data security: Use of AI and genetic
data in ART raises concerns about patient confidentiality and potential
misuse of sensitive information.
, ,
Specific ethical issues related to the emerging new trends in ART
are summarized in Table
.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for
a global registry
of human gene-editing research and stricter oversight.
,
The UNESCO International Bioethics Committee has recommended a moratorium
on germline editing.
−
In the United States, germline editing is
not explicitly banned but is heavily restricted. Federal funds cannot
be used for germline editing research, and the FDA is prohibited from
approving clinical trials involving heritable genetic modifications.
,
Many European countries have laws prohibiting germline editing.
The Oviedo Convention explicitly bans heritable genome editing.
,
In China, after the controversial case of He Jiankui (who created
the first gene-edited babies in 2018), China introduced stricter regulations
and penalties for unauthorized gene-editing experiments.
−
The UK allows gene editing in embryos for research purposes but
prohibits implantation of edited embryos. In 2023, the UK approved CRISPR-based therapies for treating blood
disorders like sickle cell anemia and beta-thalassemia, marking a
significant step forward for somatic gene editing. The International Summit on Human Genome Editing continues
to debate the ethical and scientific implications of germline editing,
with many experts calling for a cautious approach. Australia maintains
a ban on germline editing, with strict penalties for violations. However, in 2023, the Australian government
began reviewing its gene-editing laws to potentially allow somatic
cell editing for therapeutic purposes.
Conclusion
ART is rapidly evolving with research focused
on improving safety,
success rates, and accessibility. Future trends involve: (i) tailoring
treatments to individual genetic profiles through personalized medicine
approach; (ii) improving embryo selection and predicting outcomes
via AI integration and automation; (iii) expanded accessibility by
developing lower-cost methods to reach underserved populations; as
well as (iv) exploring the long-term health of ART-conceived children
and refining techniques like artificial gametes.
Emerging technologies
in ART are pushing the boundaries of reproductive
medicine, offering hope to individuals facing infertility while raising
profound ethical and societal questions. From AI-driven embryo selection
to in vitro gametogenesis and gene editing, these
advancements promise to redefine parenthood. However, translating
these innovations into clinical practice requires careful consideration
of safety, accessibility, and ethical implications to ensure equitable
and responsible use. Once an ART innovation proves successful in animal
models, it progresses to clinical trials in humans, beginning with
small, carefully monitored studies. Innovations such as time-lapse
imaging, laser-assisted hatching, and AI-driven embryo selection have
all transitioned from theory or animal-based research to human use
after rigorous validation.
Application
Although the
application of particular ART in humans is still highly
experimental, tightly regulated, and surrounded by ethical and legal
challenges, certain ART methods are already widely available. While
established techniques, such as in vitro fertilization
(IVF), cryopreservation, egg and sperm donation, and surrogacy are
widely used to address infertility and help individuals or couples
conceive, emerging technologies are expanding the boundaries of what
is possible. Some examples include: (i) time-lapse imaging –
advanced embryo monitoring systems improving the selection of viable
embryos for transfer; (ii) preimplantation genetic testing screening
embryos for chromosomal abnormalities or inherited conditions, reducing
the risk of miscarriage and genetic disorders; (iii) in vitro maturation
enables immature eggs to mature outside the body, providing an alternative
for patients who cannot undergo traditional stimulation protocols;
(iv) laser-assisted hatching technique helps embryos implant by softening
the protective shell (zona pellucida), which can sometimes hinder
implantation in older women or those using frozen embryos; (v) AI
is enhancing embryo selection, predicting treatment outcomes, and
customizing patient protocols; machine learning models analyze patient
data to predict the probability of successful pregnancy, tailoring
treatment protocols accordingly. Success rates for ART vary based
on factors such as age, the cause of infertility, and the type of
procedure. Advanced techniques like genetic testing and AI are helping
to improve outcomes.
−
A concise summary of ART success rates by technique, age group,
and indication, based on recent data (CDC/SART/ESHRE 2022–2023
reports
−
) is presented in Table
. Success rates are measured by live birth per cycle/transfer.
CDC, Center for Disease Control
and Prevention, USA; SART, Society for
Assisted Reproductive Technologies, USA; ESHRE, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; DOR, Diminished Ovarian Reserve.
Age impact: Success drops sharply after 35 due to egg
quality decline (aneuploidy rates: ∼30% at 35, ∼80%
at 42). ICSI vs IVF: ICSI improves fertilization
in male infertility
but does not boost live births if sperm is normal. PGT-A benefit: Highest in women >35 (reduces miscarriage
risk by screening abnormal embryos). FET advantage: Frozen transfers often outperform fresh
(better hormone synchronization).
Age impact: Success drops sharply after 35 due to egg
quality decline (aneuploidy rates: ∼30% at 35, ∼80%
at 42).
ICSI vs IVF: ICSI improves fertilization
in male infertility
but does not boost live births if sperm is normal.
PGT-A benefit: Highest in women >35 (reduces miscarriage
risk by screening abnormal embryos).
FET advantage: Frozen transfers often outperform fresh
(better hormone synchronization).
Statistical analysis of certain aspects of the emerging
trends in ART, synthesizing global data (2018–2023) from registries
(SART/ESHRE/ICMART),
,
and market reports are presented
below:
Global IVF cycles/year
have increased from 1.5 M (2010) to ∼3.2 M (2023) (CAGR: 7.1%);
Success rates increase45% (2023) live birth/cycle (women <
35) vs 32% (2010) due to PGT-A/IVF-ICSI; cost reduction: AI/automation
cut lab costs by 18–22% (2020–2023).
Live birth rates
have increased in 2022 vs 2015 by 8% for women 40.
Introduction
Assisted reproductive technology (ART)
encompasses a broad spectrum
of medical techniques designed to aid individuals and couples in overcoming
infertility challenges, enabling the conception of a child.
−
As infertility affects approximately 10–15% of couples worldwide,
ART is a critical component of modern healthcare.
,
Since its start with the birth of the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) baby in 1978, ART
has evolved significantly, incorporating groundbreaking scientific
and technological advancements. These developments have transformed
the field of reproductive medicine, offering innovative solutions
for diverse reproductive issues and expanding possibilities for parenthood.
ART procedures typically involve the handling of eggs, sperm, and
embryos to achieve fertilization and implantation. Techniques, such
as IVF and cryopreservation, are now standard practices in fertility
clinics worldwide. In recent years, emerging technologies such as
artificial intelligence (AI), genetic testing, and stem cell research
have further refined ART, enhancing its success rates while addressing
ethical and social implications. Furthermore, experimental innovations
like in vitro gametogenesis (IVG) hold the promise
of providing gametes for individuals who are unable to produce their
own, potentially revolutionizing reproductive options for individuals
with infertility. Noteworthy, ART is a rapidly advancing field, but
the application of certain novel and emerging technologies in humans
is still highly experimental, tightly regulated, and surrounded by
various ethical and legal challenges. They rely heavily on animal
models, which offer valuable insights into reproductive biology and
the effects of various ART interventions.
−
Along
with advances and recent success in ART, certain major challenges
and concerns exist. These include scientific hurdles such as efficiently
replicating the complex microenvironment of the gonads in vitro; ensuring
the genetic and epigenetic stability of laboratory-generated gametes;
and achieving successful fertilization, implantation, and development
using IVG-derived gametes, to mention a few. Important ethical considerations
involve: (i) safetyrisks of creating embryos from lab-generated
gametes are unknown; (ii) designer babiespotential misuse
for nontherapeutic genetic modifications; (iii) embryo overproductiongenerating
surplus embryos raises ethical concerns about their fate; (iv) consent
and accessdetermining ownership and rights over iPSC-derived
gametes. Furthermore, regulatory and social acceptance present additional
challenges related to ART, for example, public perceptions and cultural
attitudes toward creating gametes in the lab could pose serious barriers.
In this report, we explore data from the CAS Content Collection, the largest human-curated repository of scientific
information, to outline the research progress in ART. We analyze the
publication landscape to offer perspective into the latest advancements,
to identify key emerging concepts and challenges associated with ART.
We review the most discussed and emerging concepts and assess the
strategies to improve ART. We first explore the traditional methods
used in ART, with their advantages and shortcomings, then review the
recent advancements providing novel options and improving success
rates. The major types of substance classes commonly associated with
ART have been characterized. The insights from the CAS Content Collection
allowed us to identify in vitro fertilization and
embryo transfer as the best and most widely explored areas in the
field. Furthermore, the fastest growing promising novel methods in
ART have been identified as artificial intelligence integration and in vitro gametogenesis. Special attention has been devoted
to the ethical considerations associated with ART. By exploring its
scientific basis, clinical applications, and societal impact, the
report aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how ART continues
to shape the future of reproductive healthcare. The merit of the article
stems from the extensive, wide-ranging coverage of the most up-to-date
scientific information, allowing extensive breadth of landscape analysis
and in-depth insights.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.