Effect of education and counselling on reducing pain and anxiety in women undergoing hysterosalpingography: A randomised controlled trial
RCT
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
A randomized controlled trial found that pre-procedure education and counseling significantly reduced pain and anxiety in women undergoing hysterosalpingography for infertility evaluation.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of education and counselling on anxiety and pain in women undergoing hysterosalpingography (HSG) as part of infertility treatment.
BACKGROUND: The hysterosalpingography has an important diagnostic role in finding the cause of infertility and making a decision on management of treatment. In addition, it is considered a feared procedure in the infertility process and the one about which very little is known. Women often experience anxiety and pain during the HSG procedure.
DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial.
METHODS: The CONSORT guidelines have been used to describe the methods. Women who were diagnosed with infertility between February-October 2016 were included in the study. The participants were randomised and divided into intervention (52) and control (53) groups. The sociodemographic and obstetric data collection form, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and a visual analogue scale were used before the procedure. After the questionnaires were applied to the intervention group, individual learning and counselling sessions were given about the hysterosalpingography process. Brochures were also distributed to the patients for their reference after the learning session. The control group received standard care.
RESULTS: When the intervention and control groups were compared, it was found that the education and counselling given before the HSG procedure significantly decreased the level of pain and anxiety felt by women. In addition, a significant positive correlation was found between pain and anxiety after the training in the intervention group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the education and counselling given to women before the HSG procedure are effective interventions for reducing pain and anxiety in women undergoing HSG.
RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: With the application of HSG education and counselling, and the distribution of brochures to each patient, pain and anxiety can be reduced during the HSG procedure.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (45)
- Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome via openalex
- Comparison of midazolam and dexmedetomidine for pain relief during and after hysterosalpingography in women with infertility via openalex
- Effectiveness of a single education and counseling intervention in reducing anxiety in women undergoing hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial via openalex
- Information seeking and perceptions of anxiety and pain among women undergoing hysterosalpingography via openalex
- Lidocaine 10% spray reduces pain during hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial via openalex
- Pain relief in hysterosalpingography via openalex
- Predictors of Pain Associated With Hysterosalpingography (HSG): A Prospective Cohort via openalex
- The effect of preprocedure anxiety levels on postprocedure pain scores in women undergoing hysterosalpingography via openalex
- doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2515-z via openalex
- doi:10.3109/14647273.2013.781687 via openalex
- doi:10.4102/phcfm.v1i1.40 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/jocn.12338 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.radi.2005.12.002 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2015.10.006 via openalex
- W2145058059 via openalex
- W2149134211 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.015 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/01443615.2013.828025 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jcma.2014.07.004 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/jan.12841 via openalex
- doi:10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_121_16 via openalex
- W2227794470 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2017.05.005 via openalex
- doi:10.1155/2015/306248 via openalex
- doi:10.4274/jtgga.2017.0118 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.005 via openalex
- W2991792334 via openalex
- doi:10.22074/ijfs.2011.45734 via openalex
- W6636316184 via openalex
- W6676477231 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.179.1.1848715 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.003 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197604)32:2<276::aid-jclp2270320215>3.0.co;2-g via openalex
- doi:10.3109/01443615.2014.948400 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03730.x via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01621.x via openalex
- doi:10.1111/jocn.13077 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/pd.3857 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.x via openalex
- doi:10.1002/acr.20561 via openalex
- W1607171655 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/pd.4222 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02431.x via openalex
- doi:10.3736/jcim20090918 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T04:25:43.194256+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:26:18.239251+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK