Results
There were no significant differences noted in the fertilization rate between study and control
groups (55.4% vs. 64.3%; p=0.16). Of the 102 patients
included in this study, 51 received progesterone
and the other 51 did not. Table 1 describes
the basic characteristics of the patients in the two
groups. The demographic parameters were similar
in both groups in terms of age, basal FSH levels‚
body mass index (BMI)‚ the number of previous
cycles‚ etiology of infertility, and infertility duration.
Table 2 compares the previous fresh cycle
characteristics in the two groups.
The mean number of oocytes retrieved‚ mean
number of mature oocytes and the number of embryos
obtained and vitrified did not differ between
the groups. There were no significant differences
noted in the fertilization rate (55.4% vs. 64.3%;
p=0.16). In addition, the previous stimulation protocols
and fertilization procedures were similar in
the two groups. Only ejaculated sperms had used
for conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm
injection and percent of sperms with progressive
motility and sperms with normal morphology‚ also
sperm count were not different in those groups.
There was no significant difference observed
between the groups regarding the reasons for
embryo freezing. Table 3 compares the cycle
characteristics of the two groups. Endometrial
thickness and estradiol‚ progesterone and LH
levels on the day of hCG administration were
similar between groups.
The cycle length until the day of hCG administration‚
number of embryos transferred, and the
number of good-quality embryos did not differ
in the two groups. Table 4 presents a comparison
of the pregnancy outcomes of the study groups.
Again, no statistically significant differences were
observed in the clinical pregnancy rate between
the groups (33.3% vs.27.5%, p=0.66). Although
there was a trend toward an increased clinical
pregnancy rate with luteal supplementation‚ the
difference was not significant. There were no differences
between the implantation rates (16.6% vs.
15.3%‚ p=0.93) or clinical abortion rates (11.8%
vs.14.3%‚ p=0.83). The flowchart of the study is
shown in figure 1.
Characteristics of patients
Patients’ previous fresh cycle characteristics
Frozen-thawed embryo replacement cycle characteristics
Pregnancy outcomes
Flowchart of study patients
Discussion
The granulosa cells of the developing follicle generate
estradiol in response to gonadotropin stimulation
in natural cycles. The endometrium acquires
receptivity to embryo implantation by responding
to progesterone action on an appropriately primed
endometrium. Estrogenic stimulation would result in
endometrial proliferation and the induction of progesterone
receptors. The endometrium undertakes
profound conformational and biochemical changes,
from proliferative to secretory, with a concomitant
induction of endometrial receptivity and opening of
the window of implantation in response to progesterone
( 20 ). During the implantation window, the endometrium
which is unexpectedly unreceptive towards
embryo implantation acquires a functional condition
useful to blastocyst reception ( 21 ).
The transfer of frozen-thawed embryos has important
implications for the management of women undergoing
ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF ( 2 ). Frozen embryo
transfer is reported to be successful during the natural
cycle after spontaneous ovulation according to the literature
( 22 ). In a study by Morozov et al. a higher pregnancy
rate was observed in recipients who underwent
natural cryothaw cycles than in hormone replacement
treatment cycles. In their study the level of estradiol was
greater in the substitution cycles when compared with
the natural cycle. Regarding those results, we have supported
the theory that the window of uterine receptivity
closes earlier at a higher endogenous estrogen level and
limits the time for the transferred embryos to implant
successfully ( 9 ). According to their results,hormone
replacement treatment versus the natural cycle for cryothaw
embryo transfer was associated with decreased
pregnancy rates. In the current study, we have evaluated
the outcome of hCG-induced natural cryothawed
embryo transfer cycles that were supported during the
luteal phase with IM progesterone. We compared this
with the outcome of hCG-induced natural cycles in the
absence of luteal phase support.
Our hypothesis was that progesterone support has a
beneficial effect on pregnancy rate after frozen embryo
transfer in natural cycles, but the results did not support
our hypothesis. In our study, hCG was used for final oocyte
maturation. It was suggested that hCG administered
for the final oocyte maturation in stimulated IVF cycles
would cause a luteal phase defect by suppressing LH
production through a short-loop feedback mechanism
( 23 ) although the use of hCG did not down-regulate LH
secretion in the luteal phase of regular and unstimulated
cycles in women with normal ovulation ( 24 ). Additionally,
in our study none of the patients developed premature
luteinization. Premature LH surge is defined as
an LH level of ≥10 IU/L and a progesterone level of
≥1.0 ng/ml on the day of hCG administration ( 25 ). An
elevated progesterone level advances the endometrium‚
therefore the replacement of day 3 embryos occur in an
asynchronous endometrium with subsequent failure of
establishing an embryo-endometrium cross-dialog, resulting
in implantation failure ( 26 ).
Bourgain et al. have reported that progesterone induces
a secretory transformation of the endometrium in
the luteal phase ( 27 ) and by inducing this change after
sufficient estrogen priming, progesterone improves
endometrial receptivity ( 28 ). Progesterone not only
supports endometrial development but also maintains
embryo survival by shifting the immune system toward
the production of non-inflammatory Th2 cytokines ( 29 ,
30 ). In addition, by inducing nitric oxide synthesis in the
deciduas‚ they intensify local vasodilatation and uterine
repose ( 31 ). A study by Orvieto et al. has shown that,
in artificial cryothawed embryo transfer cycles, a highdose
progesterone supplementation in the luteal phase
resulted in a higher clinical pregnancy rate ( 32 ).
In contrast to our study, Bjuresten et al. have reported
that progesterone supplementation improved the live
birth rate after embryo transfer in natural cycles ( 15 ). In
their study, women received vaginal progesterone at a
dose of 400 mg twice a day from the day of the embryo
transfer. They attributed the increase in live birth rate
to the effects of vaginal progesterone. Vaginal progesterone
results in adequate endometrial development, in
spite of low serum progesterone levels.
Our study was in agreement with a study by Kyrou et
al. that reported luteal phase support did not affect ongoing
pregnancy rates in natural hCG-induced frozenthawed
embryo transfer cycles ( 33 ). A possible reason
for our finding was that the women in the present study
had a normal ovulatory function; those with ovulatory
dysfunction were excluded from the study. Luteal phase
defect in stimulated IVF cycles is due to supra physiological
levels of steroids which directly inhibit the LH
release via negative feedback actions at the hypothalamic-
pituitary axis level ( 34 ). However it seems that LPD
is not a main etiologic factor for implantation failure in
natural frozen thawed embryo transfer cycles.
Conclusions
There emerged no significant differences between the two groups in our study with regards to the implantation
or clinical pregnancy rates‚ but there was
a trend toward an increased clinical pregnancy rate
with luteal supplementation. Thus, further studies are
needed to confirm our findings.
Introduction
Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer began
in 1983 and became a popular, vital component of
assisted reproduction technology ( 1 ). The transfer
of a frozen embryo enhances the cumulative pregnancy
rate, decreases cost, Is easy to perform
and can be fulfilled successfully in a relatively
shorter time span in comparison with repeated
fresh cycles ( 2 - 5 ). Furthermore, endometrial
receptivity can be compromised by controlled
ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols ( 6 )
and secretory endometrial transformation ( 7 ).
Endometrial development in frozen-thawed cycles
can be controlled more than during COH
cycles ( 8 ).
Various protocols (gonadotropin/GnRH agonists,
clomiphene citrate, or exogenous estrogen
and progesterone) have been discussed in literature
reviews with regards to the endometrium
preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer ( 3 ,
9 ). The most prevalent protocol for frozen-thawed
embryo transfer is the natural cycle or endometrial preparation with exogenous estrogen and progesterone,
with or without the addition of a GnRH
agonist ( 10 - 12 ).
Because the natural cycle protocol does not require
exogenous hormones‚ it is favored by many
patients ( 13 ). It has been observed that temporal
characteristics of the endometrium such as the
formation of pinopodes (markers of endometrial
receptivity) are out-of-phase according to measurements
in normal females who have been placed
on exogenous steroids ( 14 ). Thus, the transfer of
frozen-thawed embryos in natural cycles is a favored
option for women with normal ovulatory
menstrual cycles ( 15 ).
There is an idea that the endogenous production
of progesterone is enough to support
implantation in a natural cycle. However, an
inadequate progesterone level at the time of
implantation or during early pregnancy may
happen naturally due to luteal phase deficiency
(LPD), which can result in infertility or abortion
( 16 ).
The reported frequency of LPD ranges from
3.7% to 20% among infertile patients ( 17 , 18 ).
The frequency has been demonstrated to be approximately
8.1% in natural cycles in normoovulatory
patients with primary or secondary
infertility ( 19 ). Thus, women who undergo frozen-
thawed embryo transfers may have sub optimal
endometrium during their natural cycles.
There is limited information about the effect
of luteal phase supplementation on pregnancy
rate in natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer
cycles. Therefore, we have designed a prospective
randomized study to verify if pregnancy
rates could be enhanced with progesterone supplementation
during the luteal phase and early
pregnancy following a frozen-thawed embryo
transfer in a natural cycle.
Materials|Methods
The study was designed as a prospective randomized
clinical trial. A total of 102 women
each underwent an embryo transfer in a natural
cycle in Yazd Research and Clinical Center for
Infertility affiliated by Shahid Sadoughi University
of Medical Sciences, from March 2011
to March 2012. This study was approved by the
Ethics Committee of Yazd Research and Clinical
Center for Infertility. Prior to starting the
study‚ an informed consent was signed by each
couple. The inclusion criteria were: cryop reserved
embryos after conventional in vitro fertilization
(IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection
(ICSI)‚ maternal age of 20-40 years (on
the day of embryo freezing)‚ regular menstrual
cycle of 25-35 days, and body mass index of
20-27 kg/m 2 . Exclusion criteria were: the use
of testicular sperm for ICSI (ejaculated sperm
only)‚ basal follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)
levels ≥12 IU/l, stage III-IV endometriosis, and
polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).
Patients were randomized to either group in
a ratio of 1:1 by means of computer-generated
random numbers on the day of participation.
Group selection and randomization were performed
by a nurse not involved in the study, by
using opaque sealed envelopes. Both the patients
and the clinicians were aware of the allocated
arm.
Of the initial 109 women invited to participate,
102 were included in the study. All women
had previously undergone IVF or ICSI with
embryo cryopreservation. They were randomly
allocated to either the progesterone (n=51) or
the no-progesterone (n=51) groups. In the progesterone
group, we excluded four women. One
patient had an endometrial polyp and three patients
had thin endometria. Similarly, three patients
were excluded from the no-progesterone
group because of endometrial polyps ( 2 ) and
one patient who did not return to the study.
Thus, in this study, 102 women each underwent
an embryo transfer in a natural cycle. The final
analysis was performed on 51 patients in each
group. On the second or third days of the menstrual
cycle, all patients underwent transvaginal
ultrasounds and serum hormone analysis
for FSH. Then, a vaginal ultrasonographic examination
was performed on cycle days 10 and repeated as necessary. Final oocyte maturation
was achieved by intramuscular (IM) administration
of 10000 IU of hCG (Pregnyl, Daropakhsh,
Iran) when an endometrial thickness of 8
mm or more and a follicle of 18 mm were present
on the ultrasound. On the day of the hCG
administration, we measured serum estradiol‚
progesterone and LH levels.
The progesterone group received 100mg/day
of progesterone (Aburaihan Pharmaceutical
Co., Tehran, Iran) IM, that began 36 hours after
the hCG administration and continued until
ten weeks of gestation if pregnancy occurred.
Control patients received no progesterone. In
both groups, cryopreserved embryo transfer
was performed with a Cook catheter (Cook Ireland
Ltd.) five days after hCG administration.
Serum β-hCG level was measured 14 days after
the transfer.
Morphology of fresh cleavage-stage embryos
was evaluated according to the number of blastomeres
and degree of fragmentation. Embryo
selection for transfer or freezing was performed
in the morning of the transfer day. Embryos
were considered suitable for freezing if they
had <30% fragmentation. Cryopreservation of
all embryos was undertaken with vitrification
by the cryotop method on day 3 of pre implantation
development in both groups. After two-step
loading with equilibration solution that contained
ethylene glycol and dimethyl sulfoxide
and a vitrification solution that contained ethylene
glycol, dimethyl sulfoxide and sucrose,
a narrow glass capillary was used to load the
embryos onto the cryotop. After loading, the
majority of the solution was removed to leave
only a thin layer that covered the embryos, after
which the sample was quickly immersed into
liquid nitrogen. Subsequently, the plastic cap
was pulled over the film part of the cryotop and
the sample stored in liquid nitrogen. At warming,
the protective cap was removed from the
cryotop while it was still submerged in liquid
nitrogen and the cryotop was immersed directly
into a 37˚C medium that contained sucrose.
Next, the embryos were sequentially incubated
in diluent solution before further in vitro culture
for transfer. Each embryo was carefully evaluated
immediately after thawing for the number
of surviving blastomeres, followed by a second
evaluation the next morning. Embryos were accepted
for transfer if they retained ≥50% of intact
blastomeres after thawing.
The main outcome measures concerned clinical
pregnancy and implantation rates. Chemical
pregnancy was defined as serum β-hCG>50
IU/L at 14 days after the embryo transfer. Clinical
pregnancy was defined as the presence of
a gestational sac with heart beat identified by
ultrasound 4-5 weeks after the embryo transfer.
Implantation rate was defined as the ratio of
gestational sacs to the number of embryos transferred.
Clinical abortion rate was determined as
clinically recognized pregnancy losses before
20 weeks of gestation.
The SPSS 19 package program was used to
perform all statistical analyses. The normality of
distribution of variables was tested by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnov test. Independent sample t test
was used for continuous variables which were
normally distributed and Mann-Whitney U test for
data not normally distributed. Chi-square or Fisher
exact tests were used for qualitative variables as
appropriate. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically
significant. The data are presented as the
mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise indicated.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
is the canonical version.