All‐cause and cardiovascular mortality after hysterectomy and oophorectomy in a large cohort (HUNT2)
article
OA: diamond
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
Hysterectomy alone was associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, whereas bilateral oophorectomy was not significantly associated with either in this large cohort study.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy are common major surgical procedures that have been associated with increased mortality risk. We aimed to assess the association of hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a Norwegian population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cohort study with data from The Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT2) linked to the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, with follow-up from 1996 until 2014 or death. The unexposed group (n = 18 673) included women with both their ovaries and uterus intact, while the two exposed groups included women with hysterectomy alone (n = 1199), or bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy (n = 907). We compared mortality in exposed vs unexposed groups and adjusted for relevant covariates by Cox regression. Further, we performed analyses stratified by age at surgery (≤39, 40-52, ≥53 years) and subgroup analyses among women ≤52 years of age at inclusion. RESULTS: Among the 47 312 women in HUNT2 (1995-1997), 20 779 provided complete information regarding gynecological surgery and previous health. The hysterectomy group had increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.58) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.09-1.97). We found no significant association between bilateral oophorectomy and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in the total population. However, among women ≤52 years at inclusion, cardiovascular mortality was increased in the hysterectomy group (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.19-6.17) with a similar, but less precise estimate in the bilateral oophorectomy group (HR 2.42, 95% CI 0.84-6.93). CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy was associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, whereas bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was not. Among women ≤52 years at inclusion, both hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy were associated with a twofold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, but the results were imprecise. Women after hysterectomy and/or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy constitute a group with increased cardiovascular mortality that may need closer attention to cardiovascular disease risk from the healthcare system to ensure timely and effective preventive interventions.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
- Long-Term Mortality Associated With Oophorectomy Compared With Ovarian Conservation in the Nurses' Health Study 2013
- Association of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with all cause and cause specific mortality: population based cohort study 2021
- All‐cause and cardiovascular mortality after hysterectomy and oophorectomy in a large cohort (<scp>HUNT2</scp>) 2023
Cited by (2)
References (28)
- All‐cause and cardiovascular mortality after hysterectomy and oophorectomy in a large cohort (<scp>HUNT2</scp>) via openalex
- Association of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with all cause and cause specific mortality: population based cohort study via openalex
- Long-Term Mortality Associated With Oophorectomy Compared With Ovarian Conservation in the Nurses' Health Study via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00187-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.042 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00696.x via openalex
- doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq477 via openalex
- doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000159344.21672.fd via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s13293-017-0152-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000000919 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/aje/kwv162 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000000118 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000001043 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/2047487314556004 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.037 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000001873 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.04.009 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.2019.19191 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2415 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e31818888f7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.002 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-021-06240-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70869-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/dez288 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e318038d333 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00197-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002229.pub4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.02.025 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-13T19:36:33.824111+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK