Good Intentions, Poor Execution? Why Current Workplace Policies on Menstrual and Menopausal Health Fall Short

In: Women's Reproductive Health · 2025 · vol. 13(2) , pp. 292–303 · doi:10.1080/23293691.2025.2520331 · W4411779232
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11

This paper examines workplace policies addressing menstrual and menopausal health and argues that current implementations are insufficient to meet employee needs.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,428 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Menstrual and menopausal workplace policies are vital for equity and well-being at the workplace—but remain uneven, underdeveloped, and rarely evaluated. While menopause has gained attention, menstruation and menstrual disorders are often overlooked. This commentary explores why menopause has become the more “acceptable” entry point and how this reflects broader stigma and power dynamics. We argue for inclusive, evidence-based policies that (1) address menstrual stigma, (2) promote leadership awareness, (3) use intersectional, participatory approaches, (4) embed thorough evaluation frameworks, and (5) go beyond leave policies to reframe reproductive health as a shared organizational concern and not as an individual burden. Acknowledgments We would like to thank Sarah White, Chief Executive Officer of Jean Hailes for Women’s Health, for her valuable feedback and input. Disclosure Statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Notes 1 Notably, pregnancy and the postpartum period are equally important reproductive life phases in which many employees face a lack of workplace support (Baird et al., Citation2025; Colussi et al., Citation2024). However, this commentary specifically focuses on menstrual and menopausal health to explore the influence of menstrual stigma on policy development, which is why pregnancy and postpartum experiences are not discussed in greater detail.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (47)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK