Good Intentions, Poor Execution? Why Current Workplace Policies on Menstrual and Menopausal Health Fall Short
article
OA: closed
CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed
this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is
available through Endo Lab. The
publisher's page (linked below)
is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional
access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary
This paper examines workplace policies addressing menstrual and menopausal health and argues that current implementations are insufficient to meet employee needs.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (47)
- Endometriosis and the workplace: Lessons from Australia’s response to COVID‐19 via openalex
- Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries via openalex
- Keep period pain a secret? Expanding the theory of planned behavior with endometriosis knowledge and menstrual stigma to explain women's intentions to talk about menstrual discomfort via openalex
- Prevalence and incidence of endometriosis in Australian women: a data linkage cohort study via openalex
- The cost of illness and economic burden of endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain in Australia: A national online survey via openalex
- The impact of endometriosis on work ability in young Australian women via openalex
- The impact of reproductive health needs on women's employment: a qualitative insight into managing endometriosis and work via openalex
- The Language of Endometriosis Prevalence: How Can Gender Inclusivity and Accuracy Coexist? via openalex
- W2905188932 via openalex
- W2951370690 via openalex
- W2964648910 via openalex
- W3003489631 via openalex
- W3015698581 via openalex
- W3034810554 via openalex
- W3043944795 via openalex
- W3083299149 via openalex
- W3090010769 via openalex
- W3101218019 via openalex
- W3113549027 via openalex
- W3115467055 via openalex
- W3133213334 via openalex
- W3183831752 via openalex
- W3205144280 via openalex
- W4200420501 via openalex
- W4211248975 via openalex
- W4285386758 via openalex
- W4367056304 via openalex
- W4380739603 via openalex
- W4388291280 via openalex
- W4388633572 via openalex
- W4391451533 via openalex
- W4391544784 via openalex
- W4396584515 via openalex
- W4398197093 via openalex
- W4405617728 via openalex
- W4409442446 via openalex
- W4409529628 via openalex
- W4410137937 via openalex
- W367280112 via openalex
- W6737933752 via openalex
- W2019552832 via openalex
- W2031619618 via openalex
- W2047873637 via openalex
- W2065026833 via openalex
- W2219994146 via openalex
- W2496230793 via openalex
- W2514923908 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK