Into the void: a review of postoperative urinary retention after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery

review OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common occurrence after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS). This review discusses the definition, incidence, evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of POUR after MIGS. RECENT FINDINGS: Reported incidence of POUR after MIGS ranges from 0.5 to 21%. Active void trials or awaiting spontaneous void after surgery are both viable options for diagnosing POUR, but active void trials appear to be more accurate, quicker, and preferred by patients. The use of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways and minimizing postoperative opioids can help reduce POUR. SUMMARY: It is important to evaluate postoperative patients for POUR after MIGS. Standard guidelines are lacking for the evaluation and treatment of patients with POUR.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

mesh:D004715

MeSH descriptors

Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Urinary Retention Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Postoperative Complications Risk Factors Urinary Catheterization Urinary Retention Urinary Retention

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:43.094626+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine