Chronic pelvic pain syndrome. A multifactorial clinical picture with indication for interdisciplinary treatment
Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS), affecting 15-30% of reproductive-aged women, is characterized by pain lasting over six months and requires interdisciplinary diagnosis of organic, non-gynecological, and psychosocial factors for indication and prognosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper reviews chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS), describing its epidemiology and the concept that pain persists for at least 6 months and has both an organic basis and psychological characteristics independent of organ findings. It outlines a multifactorial differential diagnosis encompassing gynecologic causes such as endometriosis, adhesions, and cysts, along with non-gynecologic conditions including gastrointestinal, lactose intolerance, urologic, surgical, and musculoskeletal disease, plus pelvic inflammatory disease and pelvic congestion syndrome. The authors emphasize that any indication for laparoscopy should be based on interdisciplinary diagnosis of organic gynecologic and non-gynecologic causes together with assessment of psychosocial state, including psychodiagnosis with trauma history and neurosis-oriented diagnoses. The paper provides a clinical framework rather than new empirical data, and it does not present a controlled study or quantify treatment outcomes. This paper centrally addresses chronic pelvic pain syndrome with explicit discussion of relevance to endometriosis—endometriosis is listed as a key gynecologic organ cause within the differential diagnosis for CPPS.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
3,125 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00