Editorial: Uterine factors associated with fertility impairment
This editorial introduces a collection of research on uterine factors impacting fertility, highlighting studies on endometriosis, adenomyosis, endometrial receptivity, and uterine septum management.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This editorial in Frontiers in Endocrinology discusses uterine and endometrial factors relevant to infertility, highlighting multiple invited reviews and studies spanning endometriosis, adenomyosis, implantation failure, chronic endometritis, endometrial microbiome, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals. It summarizes findings including molecular reviews of endometriosis/adenomyosis, preclinical work in a murine endometriosis model using human adipose-derived stem cell conditioned medium, mechanistic adenomyosis data implicating IL-33–HOXA10 signaling via STAT3 and bromocriptine effects on endometrial proliferation/miRNAs, and clinical modeling of live birth prediction after frozen embryo transfer in adenomyosis. It also covers recurrent implantation failure research such as an RNA-sequencing-based endometrial receptivity test showing higher pregnancy rates, cytokine profiling patterns, limited differences with LMWH or selective timing of endometrial injury, and CE studies linking hypoxic/angiogenic dysregulation to reduced receptivity. A key limitation is that, as an editorial, it provides a narrative overview rather than a single original evidence base with standardized methods. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and adenomyosis—its focus is uterine/endometrial physiology and pathology and it explicitly highlights multiple endometriosis and adenomyosis studies, including mechanistic and clinical topics.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
15,875 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
References
Keywords
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-27T00:33:14.564189+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-15T02:00:00.661756+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine