APPENDECTOMY
Histopathological examination of 300 appendectomy specimens revealed endometriosis among other unusual incidental findings, highlighting the importance of routine analysis for proper diagnosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This observational study investigated unusual incidental histopathological findings in 300 appendectomy specimens collected between January 2014 and March 2016. The researchers analyzed tissue sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, identifying acute appendicitis in 57.66% of cases alongside rare conditions such as adenocarcinoma, carcinoid tumors, Crohn's disease, and parasitic infection. The male-to-female ratio was significantly skewed at 3.61:1, with a mean patient age of 19.5 years. The authors concluded that routine histopathological examination is essential for detecting these unexpected diagnoses to ensure appropriate clinical management. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one of the unusual incidental findings identified in appendix specimens, though the paper's main focus is general histopathological screening rather than gynecological pathology.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,245 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (16)
- W139894837 via openalex
- W1565604269 via openalex
- W1981225953 via openalex
- W2015303455 via openalex
- W2063102558 via openalex
- W2114530458 via openalex
- W2189052863 via openalex
- W2308328432 via openalex
- W2405081610 via openalex
- W2433732637 via openalex
- W2439284005 via openalex
- W2502681858 via openalex
- W2547752226 via openalex
- W2603793901 via openalex
- W2737994704 via openalex
- W3022288473 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00