Use of antidepressants following hysterectomy with or without oophorectomy: A national sample in the US
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This study examined antidepressant use among women undergoing hysterectomy with or without oophorectomy in the US and found specific patterns of prescription.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveHysterectomy is one of the most common gynecological surgeries conducted around the world. Previous studies reported inconsistent results on depressive symptoms experienced after hysterectomy. This study explored the association between hysterectomy with or without oophorectomy and the use of antidepressants.Study designThis cross-sectional study included 4888 subjects between 20 and 80 years old who participated in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2015 and 2018. The associations between hysterectomy with or without oophorectomy and the use of antidepressants were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models.Main outcome measuresThere was a positive relationship between hysterectomy, both with and without oophorectomy, and the use of antidepressants after adjusting for all potential confounders (OR = 2.13, 95 % CI = 1.43-3.17, p = 0.000; OR = 2.04, 95 % CI = 1.35-3.06 p = 0.001). In the subgroup analysis stratified by race, a positive association between hysterectomy without oophorectomy was found among non-Hispanic white women (OR = 1.89, 95 % CI = 1.04-3.44, p = 0.038) and women of other races (OR = 3.14, 95 % CI = 1.30-7.56, p = 0.010), and a positive association between hysterectomy with oophorectomy was found among non-Hispanic black women (OR = 3.09, 95 % CI = 1.15-8.27, p = 0.024). However, no association was found among non-Hispanic black and Mexican American women who had undergone hysterectomy with oophorectomy, and it was not reported in women of non-Hispanic white, Mexican American or other race who underwent hysterectomy with oophorectomy.ConclusionThis study suggested that hysterectomy was significantly associated with antidepressant use, but the extent of the associations may vary by race.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (56)
- Depression Following Hysterectomy and the Influencing Factors via openalex
- Hysterectomy and incidence of depressive symptoms in midlife women: the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health via openalex
- Hysterectomy: effects on quality of life and psychological aspects via openalex
- Hysterectomy, non-malignant gynecological diseases, and the risk of incident hypertension: The E3N prospective cohort via openalex
- Long-term risk of de novo mental health conditions after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation: a cohort study via openalex
- Premenopausal factors influencing premature ovarian failure and early menopause via openalex
- Prevalence and predictors of depression and well-being after hysterectomy: An observational study via openalex
- Risk Factors for Major Depressive Disorder and the Psychological Impact of Hysterectomy: A Prospective Investigation via openalex
- Risk of depressive disorders in women undergoing hysterectomy: A population-based follow-up study via openalex
- doi:10.1067/mob.2000.107734 via openalex
- W2097564346 via openalex
- doi:10.1089/jwh.2005.14.609 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/aje/kwk018 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.02064.x via openalex
- doi:10.1089/152460901317193576 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.795885 via openalex
- doi:10.4088/jcp.10m06018blu via openalex
- doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i02 via openalex
- doi:10.3945/an.115.009258 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/13697130601170018 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.018 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/grf.0000000000000006 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2018.09.006 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/jebm.12384 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/jech-2020-214565 via openalex
- W6734092922 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/brainsci10030154 via openalex
- doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00021 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2018.07.007 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.10.009 via openalex
- doi:10.1787/18152015 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/0145721717698651 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/wps.20821 via openalex
- doi:10.5888/pcd17.190262 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1394-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e318236fd12 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/geronb/57.4.p338 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000004568 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00962.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000285997.38553.4b via openalex
- doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201500217 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181a66c42 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.11.001 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/09513590.2012.651932 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.039 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.04.021 via openalex
- doi:10.7717/peerj.7150 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000290693.78106.9a via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00696.x via openalex
- doi:10.4088/jcp.v64n0419 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000295867.06184.b1 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.gme.0000240633.46300.fa via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0378-5122(98)00112-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e318299a6cf via openalex
- doi:10.4088/jcp.v68n0619 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:50:48.314143+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK